4 Jan
2011
4 Jan
'11
2:59 a.m.
Guys,
I am not sure in which world to expect to get an answer to this so I
am sending this to both SIPP and SR-User mailing lists.
I am trying to get an SIPP end-point to register with a kamailio proxy.
I do this by sending the REGISTER from the SIPP
end-point, which is successfully responded to by kamailio with a 200 OK.
No problems there.
The problem is then with sending an INVITE from kamailio to the SIPP
instance. This is where the problems arise.
1) If I include the expected INVITE in the same xml scenario file as the
REGISTER/200, then SIPP will complain about the INVITE
as it will have a different Call-ID from the REGISTER method. I have a
hunt around the forums and this was acknowledged as an issue
but as far as I can see this has not been fixed/implemented. The
following link will take you to a proposed fix for this issue.
http://sipp.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Patches#Pre.2FPost_scenarios
Does anyone know what the current state of play is for this proposed
patch or if there is another way to get around this issue?
2) I tried to REGISTER the SIPP endpoint in a single xml scenario file
with kamailio. This works as per usual. I then killed
the SIPP instance and ran a new SIPP script listening on the same port
before trying to send the INVITE to it. I expected this to work
as the SIPP scenarios (both sending REGISTER and expecting INVITE)
listened on the same port. However, the INVITE was not
received by the SIPP endpoint. Can anyone think of a reason for this?
If any further info is required then please let me know. I have spent
quite a bit of time on this and its an itch that needs scratched.
Thanks in advance,
Steve.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen McVarnock,
AePONA Ltd,
Interpoint Building,
20-24 York Street,
Belfast BT15 1AQ
Tel: +44 (0)28 9026 9114
Fax: +44 (0)28 9026 9111
http://www.aepona.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4 Jan
4 Jan
9:14 a.m.
Am 04.01.2011 08:59, schrieb Stephen McVarnock:
2) I tried to REGISTER the SIPP endpoint in a single
xml scenario file
with kamailio. This works as per usual. I then killed
the SIPP instance and ran a new SIPP script listening on the same port
before trying to send the INVITE to it. I expected this to work
as the SIPP scenarios (both sending REGISTER and expecting INVITE)
listened on the same port. However, the INVITE was not
received by the SIPP endpoint. Can anyone think of a reason for this?
That should work - if you use UDP and the time interval between REGISTER
and INVITE is small (<30 seconds to avoid NAT/FW issues).
Of course, it also depends if sipp is behind NAT/FW and the Contact used
by sipp during REGISTER is correct. If there is some kind of NAT/FW then
you should use fix_nated_register() before save().
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/nathelper.html#id26108…
Read carefully and set the mentioned module parameters!
regards
Klaus
11:49 a.m.
New subject: [Sipp-users] Use of SIPP along with kamailio - REGISTER followed by INVITE not working
Hey guys
Here is what I typically do in a scenario like this:
SIPp instance no 1 (port x): handles registrations but will register
with NOT with port X but with port Y.
SIPp instance no 2 (port y): handles the "other" traffic, such as
INVITE, MESSAGE whatever.
The reason for this is that when I do load testing, I cannot go off
and kill my REGISTER SIPp instance plus I don't want to have to deal
with timing issues etc (I haven't noticed that though). Of course,
this assumes there is no NAT between you and the server, which in our
test lab, we dont have (unless we are explicitly testing NAT
scenarios).
Anyway, just another idea.
/Jonas
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Am 04.01.2011 08:59, schrieb Stephen McVarnock:
2) I tried to REGISTER the SIPP endpoint in a
single xml scenario file
with kamailio. This works as per usual. I then killed
the SIPP instance and ran a new SIPP script listening on the same port
before trying to send the INVITE to it. I expected this to work
as the SIPP scenarios (both sending REGISTER and expecting INVITE)
listened on the same port. However, the INVITE was not
received by the SIPP endpoint. Can anyone think of a reason for this?
That should work - if you use UDP and the time interval between REGISTER
and INVITE is small (<30 seconds to avoid NAT/FW issues).
Of course, it also depends if sipp is behind NAT/FW and the Contact used
by sipp during REGISTER is correct. If there is some kind of NAT/FW then
you should use fix_nated_register() before save().
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/nathelper.html#id26108…
Read carefully and set the mentioned module parameters!
regards
Klaus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
5 Jan
5 Jan
4:42 a.m.
New subject: [Sipp-users] Use of SIPP along with kamailio - REGISTER followed by INVITE not working
Klaus, Jonas,
cheers for the helpful responses - much appreciated.
Thanks again.
Steve.
Hey guys
Here is what I typically do in a scenario like this:
SIPp instance no 1 (port x): handles registrations but will register
with NOT with port X but with port Y.
SIPp instance no 2 (port y): handles the "other" traffic, such as
INVITE, MESSAGE whatever.
The reason for this is that when I do load testing, I cannot go off
and kill my REGISTER SIPp instance plus I don't want to have to deal
with timing issues etc (I haven't noticed that though). Of course,
this assumes there is no NAT between you and the server, which in our
test lab, we dont have (unless we are explicitly testing NAT
scenarios).
Anyway, just another idea.
/Jonas
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen McVarnock,
AePONA Ltd,
Interpoint Building,
20-24 York Street,
Belfast BT15 1AQ
Tel: +44 (0)28 9026 9114
Fax: +44 (0)28 9026 9111
http://www.aepona.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Am 04.01.2011 08:59, schrieb Stephen McVarnock:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
2) I tried to REGISTER the SIPP endpoint in a
single xml scenario file
with kamailio. This works as per usual. I then killed
the SIPP instance and ran a new SIPP script listening on the same port
before trying to send the INVITE to it. I expected this to work
as the SIPP scenarios (both sending REGISTER and expecting INVITE)
listened on the same port. However, the INVITE was not
received by the SIPP endpoint. Can anyone think of a reason for this?
That should work - if you use UDP and the time interval between REGISTER
and INVITE is small (<30 seconds to avoid NAT/FW issues).
Of course, it also depends if sipp is behind NAT/FW and the Contact used
by sipp during REGISTER is correct. If there is some kind of NAT/FW then
you should use fix_nated_register() before save().
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/nathelper.html#id26108…
Read carefully and set the mentioned module parameters!
regards
Klaus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
5158
days inactive
5159
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jonas Borjesson -
Klaus Darilion -
Stephen McVarnock