you have to edit the Makefile.defs, comment the line
with
-DDBG_QM_MALLOC and uncomment the one with -DF_MALLOC (somewhere
around line 300). Then recompile&reinstall -- do not forget the radius
modules, they are not compiled/installed by default.
Daniel
On 04/12/05 02:03, Rod Bacon wrote:
Can someone please let me know how to get rid of
all the "extra debug
information", as I am trying to debug a RADIUS problem, but can't
find any useful info because of all the memory debug stuff that's in
the way.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Java Rockx <mailto:javarockx@gmail.com>
*To:* Steve Blair <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>
*Cc:* serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> ; Rod Bacon
<mailto:rod.bacon@empoweredcomms.com.au>
*Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2005 3:21 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability
Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is
that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the
Makefile.
Regards,
Paul
On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, *Steve Blair* <blairs(a)isc.upenn.edu
<mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>> wrote:
Paul:
Two things=are getting me right now both are errors with
serctl.
The main problem =s the inability to add/delete aliases. It
seems
SER remembers the previ=usly defined alias but serctl will not
delete it. Therefore I cannot re=lace that alias with a new one.
One other annoying iss=e is the copious amount of log
messages
that are written to syslog when=the server is shutdown. It is
so bad
I've actually stored up several ch=nges, schedule an outage,
reboot
the entire machine, implement the chan=es and hope I haven't
made
a mistake.
I'd have to c=eck on the version but I think it is 0.9.1
and the
last checkout was ab=ut one week ago.
Java Rockx wrote:
Steve=
Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behav=ors"
you
see with
ser-0.9?
Also, are you usin= 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was
your CVS
checkout?
&g=;
Regards,
Paul
On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *S=eve Blair* <blairs(a)isc.upenn.ed=
<mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>
<mailto:blairs@isc=upenn.edu
<mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>>>
wrote:
&nbs=; Rod:
Overall I'd say=yes. The avp functionality has been
the biggest
win
&nb=p; for us.
We still have several odd=little behaviors some of
which are
actuall= bugs.
This is a little unnerving on produ=tion systems but we
are using
the 0.9.0
&n=sp; -Steve
Rod Bacon wrote:<=r>>
> I understand that the latest &=uot;stable" release is
still 0.8.14, but
&nb=p; > what are peoples general
experiences with 0.9.0?
&nbs=; >
Is it worth the up=rade?
=> _______________________________________________
&n=sp; > Serusers mailing list
> =a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org
<mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
<http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/s=rusers>
= _______________________________________________*>
Serusers
mailing list
&nb=p; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
<mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
<=ailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org
<mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>>
=gt;
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
<http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listi=fo/serusers>
*>
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsy=vania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
v=ice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001=br>
fax: 215-898-9348
si=:blairs@upenn.edu <mailto:sip:blairs@upenn.edu>
**
**
**
** **
------------------------------------------------------------------------
** ****_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers**
**
**
------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
**
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org