Steve,

Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behaviors" you see with ser-0.9?

Also, are you using 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was your CVS checkout?

Regards, Paul

On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, Steve Blair blairs@isc.upenn.edu wrote:

Rod:

Overall I'd say yes. The avp functionality has been the biggest win for us. We still have several odd little behaviors some of which are actually bugs. This is a little unnerving on production systems but we are using the 0.9.0 release anyway.

-Steve

Rod Bacon wrote:

...

I understand that the latest "stable" release is still 0.8.14, but what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?

Is it worth the upgrade?

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the Makefile.

Regards, Paul

On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, Steve Blair blairs@isc.upenn.edu wrote:

Paul:

Two things are getting me right now both are errors with serctl. The main problem is the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems SER remembers the previously defined alias but serctl will not delete it. Therefore I cannot replace that alias with a new one.

One other annoying issue is the copious amount of log messages that are written to syslog when the server is shutdown. It is so bad I've actually stored up several changes, schedule an outage, reboot the entire machine, implement the changes and hope I haven't made a mistake.

I'd have to check on the version but I think it is 0.9.1 and the last checkout was about one week ago.

Java Rockx wrote:

...

Steve,

Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behaviors" you see with ser-0.9?

Also, are you using 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was your CVS checkout?

Regards, Paul

On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *Steve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.edu mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu> wrote:

Rod:

Overall I'd say yes. The avp functionality has been the biggest win for us. We still have several odd little behaviors some of which are actually bugs. This is a little unnerving on production systems but we are using the 0.9.0 release anyway.

-Steve

Rod Bacon wrote:

...

I understand that the latest "stable" release is still 0.8.14, but what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?

Is it worth the upgrade?

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--

ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104

voice: 215-573-8396

215-746-8001

fax: 215-898-9348

sip:blairs@upenn.edu

you have to edit the Makefile.defs, comment the line with -DDBG_QM_MALLOC and uncomment the one with -DF_MALLOC (somewhere around line 300). Then recompile&reinstall -- do not forget the radius modules, they are not compiled/installed by default.

Daniel

On 04/12/05 02:03, Rod Bacon wrote:

Can someone please let me know how to get rid of all the "extra debug information", as I am trying to debug a RADIUS problem, but can't find any useful info because of all the memory debug stuff that's in the way.

----- Original Message -----
*From:* Java Rockx <mailto:javarockx@gmail.com>
*To:* Steve Blair <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>
*Cc:* serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> ; Rod Bacon
<mailto:rod.bacon@empoweredcomms.com.au>
*Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2005 3:21 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability

Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is
that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the
Makefile.

Regards,
Paul

On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, *Steve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.edu
<mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>> wrote:


    Paul:

       Two things=are getting me right now both are errors with
    serctl.
    The main problem =s the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems
    SER remembers the previ=usly defined alias but serctl will not
    delete it. Therefore I cannot re=lace that alias with a new one.

       One other annoying iss=e is the copious amount of log messages
    that are written to syslog when=the server is shutdown. It is
    so bad
    I've actually stored up several ch=nges, schedule an outage,
    reboot
    the entire machine, implement the chan=es and hope I haven't made
    a mistake.

       I'd have to c=eck on the version but I think it is 0.9.1
    and the
    last checkout was ab=ut one  week ago.


    Java Rockx wrote:

    > Steve=
    >
    > Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behav=ors"
    you see with
    > ser-0.9?
    >
    > Also, are you usin= 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was
    your CVS
    > checkout?
    &g=;
    > Regards,
    > Paul
    >
    > On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *S=eve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.ed=
    <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>
    > <mailto:blairs@isc=upenn.edu <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>>>
    wrote:
    >
    >
    >   &nbs=; Rod:
    >
    >       Overall I'd say=yes. The avp functionality has been
    the biggest win
    >  &nb=p;  for us.
    >     We still have several odd=little behaviors some of which are
    >     actuall= bugs.
    >     This is a little unnerving on produ=tion systems but we
    are using
    >     the 0.9.0

    >
    >  &n=sp;  -Steve
    >
    >     Rod Bacon wrote:<=r>>
    >     > I understand that the latest &=uot;stable" release is
    still 0.8.14, but
    >   &nb=p; > what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?
    > &nbs=;   >
    >     > Is it worth the up=rade?
    >     >
    >    => _______________________________________________
    >  &n=sp;  > Serusers mailing list
    >     > =a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org
    <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
    > =nbsp;   > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/s=rusers>
    >
    >=     _______________________________________________*>    
    Serusers mailing list
    >  &nb=p;  serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
    <=ailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>>
    =gt;     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listi=fo/serusers>
    >*>

    --

    ISC Network Engineering
    The University of Pennsy=vania
    3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
    Philadelphia, PA 19104

    v=ice: 215-573-8396

           215-746-8001=br>
    fax: 215-898-9348

    si=:blairs@upenn.edu <mailto:sip:blairs@upenn.edu>

    **

**
**

** **

------------------------------------------------------------------------
** ****_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers**

**

**

** _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers **

Thanks for that!

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

you have to edit the Makefile.defs, comment the line with -DDBG_QM_MALLOC and uncomment the one with -DF_MALLOC (somewhere around line 300). Then recompile&reinstall -- do not forget the radius modules, they are not compiled/installed by default.

Daniel

On 04/12/05 02:03, Rod Bacon wrote:

...

Can someone please let me know how to get rid of all the "extra debug information", as I am trying to debug a RADIUS problem, but can't find any useful info because of all the memory debug stuff that's in the way.

----- Original Message -----
*From:* Java Rockx <mailto:javarockx@gmail.com>
*To:* Steve Blair <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>
*Cc:* serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> ; Rod Bacon
<mailto:rod.bacon@empoweredcomms.com.au>
*Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2005 3:21 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability

Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is
that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the
Makefile.

Regards,
Paul

On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, *Steve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.edu
<mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>> wrote:


    Paul:

       Two things=are getting me right now both are errors with
    serctl.
    The main problem =s the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems
    SER remembers the previ=usly defined alias but serctl will not
    delete it. Therefore I cannot re=lace that alias with a new one.

       One other annoying iss=e is the copious amount of log messages
    that are written to syslog when=the server is shutdown. It is
    so bad
    I've actually stored up several ch=nges, schedule an outage,
    reboot
    the entire machine, implement the chan=es and hope I haven't made
    a mistake.

       I'd have to c=eck on the version but I think it is 0.9.1
    and the
    last checkout was ab=ut one  week ago.


    Java Rockx wrote:

    > Steve=
    >
    > Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behav=ors"
    you see with
    > ser-0.9?
    >
    > Also, are you usin= 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was
    your CVS
    > checkout?
    &g=;
    > Regards,
    > Paul
    >
    > On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *S=eve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.ed=
    <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>
    > <mailto:blairs@isc=upenn.edu <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>>>
    wrote:
    >
    >
    >   &nbs=; Rod:
    >
    >       Overall I'd say=yes. The avp functionality has been
    the biggest win
    >  &nb=p;  for us.
    >     We still have several odd=little behaviors some of which 

are > actuall= bugs. > This is a little unnerving on produ=tion systems but we are using > the 0.9.0

    >
    >  &n=sp;  -Steve
    >
    >     Rod Bacon wrote:<=r>>
    >     > I understand that the latest &=uot;stable" release is
    still 0.8.14, but
    >   &nb=p; > what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?
    > &nbs=;   >
    >     > Is it worth the up=rade?
    >     >
    >    => _______________________________________________
    >  &n=sp;  > Serusers mailing list
    >     > =a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org
    <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
    > =nbsp;   > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/s=rusers>
    >
    >=     _______________________________________________*>    
    Serusers mailing list
    >  &nb=p;  serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
    <=ailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>>
    =gt;     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listi=fo/serusers>
    >*>

    --

    ISC Network Engineering
    The University of Pennsy=vania
    3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
    Philadelphia, PA 19104

    v=ice: 215-573-8396

           215-746-8001=br>
    fax: 215-898-9348

    si=:blairs@upenn.edu <mailto:sip:blairs@upenn.edu>

    **

**
**

** **

---

** ****_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers**

**

**

** _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers **