Thanks for your replies.

System CPU or User CPU?

Well, it's cpu from top. %Cpu0 : 8.3 us, 6.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 84.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 1.0 si, 0.0 st %Cpu1 : 6.2 us, 5.2 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 2.1 si, 0.0 st PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 5671 root 15 -5 779912 13856 1556 S 14.9 0.7 0:22.73 rtpengine

This says nothing since your guest might be throttled.

You neglected to mention this explicitly, but I guess you are trying to say that rtpproxy uses less during normal operation?

Yes, rtpproxy uses less than rtpengine. Right now, with 300 calls, rtpproxy is using 7% and rtpengine almost 13% of cpu.

If kernel forwarding is not in use, I would strongly suggest to enable it.

I compiled just daemon mode with no kernel module. I think I will try this too, eventually. I have to see how to compile it here.

This is my cfg. Could you check if this is ok?

route[NATMANAGE] { xlog("L_ERR", "NATMANAGE $Ri $rd $du $avp(rtpengine)");

#Just replies if (!is_pure_ip($rd)){ if ( $avp(rtpengine) == "1"){ xlog("L_ERR", "NATMANAGE $rd Not a valid ip - rtpengine active"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove"); } exit; }

if (is_ip_rfc1918($Ri)){ if (is_ip_rfc1918($rd)){ xlog("L_ERR", "NATMANAGE Priv -> Priv"); #Not proxying for now $avp(rtpengine) = "1"; rtpengine_manage("direction=priv direction=priv replace-origin replace-session-connection RTP/AVP"); } else{ xlog("L_ERR", "NATMANAGE Priv -> Pub"); $avp(rtpengine) = "1"; #rtpengine_manage("direction=priv direction=pub replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP"); rtpengine_manage("direction=priv direction=pub replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove"); } } else{ if (is_ip_rfc1918($rd)){ xlog("L_ERR", "NATMANAGE Pub -> Priv"); $avp(rtpengine) = "1"; #rtpengine_manage("direction=pub direction=priv replace-origin replace-session-connection RTP/AVP ICE=remove"); rtpengine_manage("direction=pub direction=priv replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove"); } else{ xlog("L_ERR", "NATMANAGE Pub -> Pub"); $avp(rtpengine) = "1"; #rtpengine_manage("direction=pub direction=pub replace-origin replace-session-connection RTP/AVP ICE=remove"); rtpengine_manage("direction=pub direction=pub replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove"); }

}

return; }

Thanks!

Diego.

2017-05-03 13:01 GMT-03:00 Richard Fuchs rfuchs@sipwise.com:

On 05/03/2017 11:10 AM, Diego Nadares wrote:

Hi guys,

I'm using rtpengine (compiled from source) and I see a lot of difference in cpu usage comparing with rtpproxy. Is this normal?

With 600 calls:

cpu *41.7%* rtpengine

System CPU or User CPU?

If kernel forwarding is not in use, I would strongly suggest to enable it.

Also, running rtpengine (and I would think the same is true for rtpproxy) in a VM is not recommended.

Cheers

---

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users