Hi, I'm not so sure...
Both are REFER based, but the signaling in the draft is:
Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
and the signaling implemented with serweb is: Proxy --INVITE--> A Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
I prefer the "REFER in session" serweb implementation, but I think the draft solution is different.
Best regards,
G.
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Jan Janak jan@iptel.org Fecha: Domingo, Abril 4, 2004 9:00 pm Asunto: Re: [Serusers] click to dial
serweb implements exactly that (REFER based) scenario.
Jan.
On 01-04 17:40, Gustavo Garcia Bernardo wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing click to dial service in serweb, and I there are some differences with draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-06, are there intentioned changes?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-
examples-06.t
xt
I think the draft solution is simpler to implement in terminals and application servers.
G.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
On 05-04 09:56, GUSTAVO GARCIA BERNARDO wrote:
Hi, I'm not so sure...
Both are REFER based, but the signaling in the draft is:
Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
and the signaling implemented with serweb is: Proxy --INVITE--> A Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
I prefer the "REFER in session" serweb implementation, but I think the draft solution is different.
It's basically the same. The reason why we send INVITE first is that some phones refuse standalone REFERs.
Jan.
Ok, I understand the advantages
Other question about this, after REFER you send BYE, is this correct? Doesn't it close the session?
G.
-----Mensaje original----- De: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Enviado el: lunes, 05 de abril de 2004 16:12 Para: GUSTAVO GARCIA BERNARDO CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] click to dial
On 05-04 09:56, GUSTAVO GARCIA BERNARDO wrote:
Hi, I'm not so sure...
Both are REFER based, but the signaling in the draft is:
Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
and the signaling implemented with serweb is: Proxy --INVITE--> A Proxy --REFER--> A A --INVITE--> B
I prefer the "REFER in session" serweb implementation, but I think the
draft solution is different.
It's basically the same. The reason why we send INVITE first is that some phones refuse standalone REFERs.
Jan.
At 04:24 PM 4/5/2004, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Gustavo_Garc=EDa_Bernardo?= wrote:
Ok, I understand the advantages
Other question about this, after REFER you send BYE, is this correct? Doesn't it close the session?
Yes, it closes the dummy INVITE session. It has no impact though on the session initiated through REFER.
-jiri
-
GUSTAVO GARCIA BERNARDO -
Jan Janak -
Jiri Kuthan