15 May
2008
15 May
'08
7:26 p.m.
Hi all,
Trying to install Openser1.3.2.... everything is OK and fine... but when I
try to add support for snmp there are errors.. Dig dep into google,
recheck all dependencies and didn't succeed...
My env is FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386
The full net-snmp package is installed:
atila# pkg_info | grep net-snmp
net-snmp-5.3.2_3 An extendable SNMP implementation
These are the error messages....
make modules/libsnmpstats modules....
Compiling alarm_checks.c
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall
-minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=prescott
-Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-field-initializers
-DMOD_NAME='"snmpstats"' -DNAME='"openser"'
-DVERSION='"1.3.2-notls"'
-DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"freebsd"'
-DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.2.1"' -D__CPU_i386
-D__OS_freebsd -D__SMP_no -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/openser/"'
-DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP
-DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DSTATISTICS -DCHANGEABLE_DEBUG_LEVEL
-DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024
-DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN
-DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_CONNECT_ECONNRESET_BUG
-DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_NETINET_IN_SYSTM -DHAVE_KQUEUE -DHAVE_SELECT -c
alarm_checks.c -o alarm_checks.o
In file included from alarm_checks.c:38:
openserObjects.h:41:38: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h: No such file or
directory
openserObjects.h:42:40: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-includes.h: No such file
or directory
openserObjects.h:43:52: error: net-snmp/agent/net-snmp-agent-includes.h:
No such file or directory
If I edit each file and hardcode the path ... /usr/local/include/net-snmp/...
there are no errors... What am I missing in making sure the path to the
include files are OK... Tried a couple options but didn't succeed... tehre
are tons of include files into the src....
Regards
Ricardo Ferreira
Yes, we do run Openser
www.vipway.com.br
Enterprise VoIP Services
15 May
15 May
8:42 p.m.
Hi Ricardo,
I think that openser need the smnp heads (source).
Do you have ALL source in your system?
Maybe you need reinstall the snmp service...
I hope I have helped you!
Ricardo Alves Ferreira Silva <ricardo.ferreira(a)vipfone.net.br> escreveu: Hi all,
Trying to install Openser1.3.2.... everything is OK and fine... but when I
try to add support for snmp there are errors.. Dig dep into google,
recheck all dependencies and didn't succeed...
My env is FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386
The full net-snmp package is installed:
atila# pkg_info | grep net-snmp
net-snmp-5.3.2_3 An extendable SNMP implementation
These are the error messages....
make modules/libsnmpstats modules....
Compiling alarm_checks.c
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall
-minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=prescott
-Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-field-initializers
-DMOD_NAME='"snmpstats"' -DNAME='"openser"'
-DVERSION='"1.3.2-notls"'
-DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"freebsd"'
-DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.2.1"' -D__CPU_i386
-D__OS_freebsd -D__SMP_no -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/openser/"'
-DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP
-DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DSTATISTICS -DCHANGEABLE_DEBUG_LEVEL
-DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024
-DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN
-DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_CONNECT_ECONNRESET_BUG
-DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_NETINET_IN_SYSTM -DHAVE_KQUEUE -DHAVE_SELECT -c
alarm_checks.c -o alarm_checks.o
In file included from alarm_checks.c:38:
openserObjects.h:41:38: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h: No such file or
directory
openserObjects.h:42:40: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-includes.h: No such file
or directory
openserObjects.h:43:52: error: net-snmp/agent/net-snmp-agent-includes.h:
No such file or directory
If I edit each file and hardcode the path ... /usr/local/include/net-snmp/...
there are no errors... What am I missing in making sure the path to the
include files are OK... Tried a couple options but didn't succeed... tehre
are tons of include files into the src....
Regards
Ricardo Ferreira
Yes, we do run Openser
www.vipway.com.br
Enterprise VoIP Services
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
---------------------------------
Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!
16 May
16 May
5:36 a.m.
Hello Ricardo,
Trying to install Openser1.3.2.... everything is OK
and fine... but
when I
try to add support for snmp there are errors.. Dig dep into google,
recheck all dependencies and didn't succeed...
My env is FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386
The full net-snmp package is installed:
atila# pkg_info | grep net-snmp
net-snmp-5.3.2_3 An extendable SNMP implementation
For some reason, the include directory for net-snmp does not get
defines in Makefile (the ifeq ($(BUILDER),) condition fails).
As a quick fix, add the line DEFS +=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include just after
the first else:
BUILDER = $(shell which net-snmp-config)
ifeq ($(BUILDER),)
DEFS +=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
BUILDAGENTLIBS =-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lnetsnmpmibs -
lnetsnmpagent \
-lnetsnmphelpers -lnetsnmp
INSTALLMIBDIR = $(cfg-prefix)/share/snmp/mibs
else
DEFS +=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
BUILDAGENTLIBS = $(shell net-snmp-config --agent-libs)
INSTALLMIBDIR = $(cfg-prefix)$(shell net-snmp-config --
prefix)/share/snmp/mibs
endif
This will make that module compiles.
Saludos
JesusR.
These are the error messages....
make modules/libsnmpstats modules....
Compiling alarm_checks.c
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall
-minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=prescott
-Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-field-initializers
-DMOD_NAME='"snmpstats"' -DNAME='"openser"'
-DVERSION='"1.3.2-
notls"'
-DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"freebsd"'
-DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.2.1"' -D__CPU_i386
-D__OS_freebsd -D__SMP_no -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/openser/"'
-DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP
-DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DSTATISTICS -
DCHANGEABLE_DEBUG_LEVEL
-DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024
-DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN
-DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -
DHAVE_CONNECT_ECONNRESET_BUG
-DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_NETINET_IN_SYSTM -DHAVE_KQUEUE -DHAVE_SELECT -c
alarm_checks.c -o alarm_checks.o
In file included from alarm_checks.c:38:
openserObjects.h:41:38: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h: No such
file or
directory
openserObjects.h:42:40: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-includes.h: No such
file
or directory
openserObjects.h:43:52: error: net-snmp/agent/net-snmp-agent-
includes.h:
No such file or directory
If I edit each file and hardcode the path ... /usr/local/include/net-
snmp/...
there are no errors... What am I missing in making sure the path to
the
include files are OK... Tried a couple options but didn't succeed...
tehre
are tons of include files into the src....
Regards
Ricardo Ferreira
Yes, we do run Openser
www.vipway.com.br
Enterprise VoIP Services
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Saludos
JesusR.
------------------------------------
Jesus Rodriguez
VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L.
jesusr(a)voztele.com
http://www.voztele.com
Tel. 902360305
-------------------------------------
10:36 a.m.
Hi Jesus,
Bingo! right to the point....
Big thanks,
Saude!!!
Regards
Ricardo Ferreira
Yes, we do run Openser
www.vipway.com.br
Enterprise VoIP Services
Hello Ricardo,
--
Eng Ricardo Ferreira
Cisco Certified Engineer-CCDP,CCNP,CCDA,CCNA
Microsoft Systems Engineer-MCSE
BSD Support Engineer
Trying to install Openser1.3.2.... everything is
OK and fine... but
when I
try to add support for snmp there are errors.. Dig dep into google,
recheck all dependencies and didn't succeed...
My env is FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386
The full net-snmp package is installed:
atila# pkg_info | grep net-snmp
net-snmp-5.3.2_3 An extendable SNMP implementation
For some reason, the include directory for net-snmp does not get
defines in Makefile (the ifeq ($(BUILDER),) condition fails).
As a quick fix, add the line DEFS +=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include just after
the first else:
BUILDER = $(shell which net-snmp-config)
ifeq ($(BUILDER),)
DEFS +=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
BUILDAGENTLIBS =-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lnetsnmpmibs -
lnetsnmpagent \
-lnetsnmphelpers -lnetsnmp
INSTALLMIBDIR = $(cfg-prefix)/share/snmp/mibs
else
DEFS +=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
BUILDAGENTLIBS = $(shell net-snmp-config --agent-libs)
INSTALLMIBDIR = $(cfg-prefix)$(shell net-snmp-config --
prefix)/share/snmp/mibs
endif
This will make that module compiles.
Saludos
JesusR.
These are the error messages....
make modules/libsnmpstats modules....
Compiling alarm_checks.c
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall
-minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=prescott
-Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-field-initializers
-DMOD_NAME='"snmpstats"' -DNAME='"openser"'
-DVERSION='"1.3.2-
notls"'
-DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"freebsd"'
-DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.2.1"' -D__CPU_i386
-D__OS_freebsd -D__SMP_no -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/openser/"'
-DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP
-DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DSTATISTICS -
DCHANGEABLE_DEBUG_LEVEL
-DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024
-DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN
-DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -
DHAVE_CONNECT_ECONNRESET_BUG
-DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_NETINET_IN_SYSTM -DHAVE_KQUEUE -DHAVE_SELECT -c
alarm_checks.c -o alarm_checks.o
In file included from alarm_checks.c:38:
openserObjects.h:41:38: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h: No such
file or
directory
openserObjects.h:42:40: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-includes.h: No such
file
or directory
openserObjects.h:43:52: error: net-snmp/agent/net-snmp-agent-
includes.h:
No such file or directory
If I edit each file and hardcode the path ... /usr/local/include/net-
snmp/...
there are no errors... What am I missing in making sure the path to
the
include files are OK... Tried a couple options but didn't succeed...
tehre
are tons of include files into the src....
Regards
Ricardo Ferreira
Yes, we do run Openser
www.vipway.com.br
Enterprise VoIP Services
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Saludos
JesusR.
------------------------------------
Jesus Rodriguez
VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L.
jesusr(a)voztele.com
http://www.voztele.com
Tel. 902360305
-------------------------------------
10:19 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no longer
supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
7:42 AM
18 May
18 May
3:12 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Here is why I ask:
[root@proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
Udp:
159293 packets received
2016 packets to unknown port received.
153899 packet receive errors
185342 packets sent
On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors, which
I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows, that proxy
is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty basic config, but I
can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls per second. I would expect
to be able to do a lot more than that. So I was trying to make sure that no
unnecessary udp traffic was going in or out.
The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors, 4 Gb of RAM, running CentOS
5 x86_64.
Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting if
someone wants to look into it.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no longer
supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
7:42 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
7:42 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
5:07 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Hello,
please try the attached patch (is for devel but should apply on 1.3.2,
if no, let me know and I send you another). Similar issue was reported
to me some time ago, started to investigate but at some point I forgot
about. I think you face the same case: somewhere in the script you do an
IP comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between
quotes. The patch fixed the reverse dns in this case if rev_dns=no. I
will look more into it to find a better solution -- detecting if the
value is an IP address and avoid DNS lookup, a.s.o, for IP comparisons.
Let me know the results.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/18/08 22:12, Michael Young wrote:
Here is why I ask:
[root@proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
Udp:
159293 packets received
2016 packets to unknown port received.
153899 packet receive errors
185342 packets sent
On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors, which
I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows, that proxy
is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty basic config, but I
can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls per second. I would expect
to be able to do a lot more than that. So I was trying to make sure that no
unnecessary udp traffic was going in or out.
The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors, 4 Gb of RAM, running CentOS
5 x86_64.
Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting if
someone wants to look into it.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no longer
supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
7:42 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
7:42 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
http://www.asipto.com
19 May
19 May
12:24 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Daniel, thanks.
I applied the patch and recompiled, and the reverse DNS lookup no longer
occurs. I will load test and let you know how this affects performance.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Michael Young
Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Hello,
please try the attached patch (is for devel but should apply on 1.3.2, if
no, let me know and I send you another). Similar issue was reported to me
some time ago, started to investigate but at some point I forgot about. I
think you face the same case: somewhere in the script you do an IP
comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between quotes.
The patch fixed the reverse dns in this case if rev_dns=no. I will look more
into it to find a better solution -- detecting if the value is an IP address
and avoid DNS lookup, a.s.o, for IP comparisons.
Let me know the results.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/18/08 22:12, Michael Young wrote:
Here is why I ask:
[root@proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
Udp:
159293 packets received
2016 packets to unknown port received.
153899 packet receive errors
185342 packets sent
On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors,
which I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows,
that proxy is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty
basic config, but I can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls
per second. I would expect to be able to do a lot more than that. So I
was trying to make sure that no unnecessary udp traffic was going in or
out.
The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors, 4 Gb of RAM, running
CentOS
5 x86_64.
Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting
if someone wants to look into it.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no
longer supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date:
5/18/2008
9:31 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
http://www.asipto.com
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
3:32 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Hello Michael,
thanks for testing and reporting back. The patch was committed to SVN in
all recent branches.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/19/08 07:24, Michael Young wrote:
Daniel, thanks.
I applied the patch and recompiled, and the reverse DNS lookup no longer
occurs. I will load test and let you know how this affects performance.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Michael Young
Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Hello,
please try the attached patch (is for devel but should apply on 1.3.2, if
no, let me know and I send you another). Similar issue was reported to me
some time ago, started to investigate but at some point I forgot about. I
think you face the same case: somewhere in the script you do an IP
comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between quotes.
The patch fixed the reverse dns in this case if rev_dns=no. I will look more
into it to find a better solution -- detecting if the value is an IP address
and avoid DNS lookup, a.s.o, for IP comparisons.
Let me know the results.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/18/08 22:12, Michael Young wrote:
--
http://www.asipto.com
Here is why I ask:
[root@proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
Udp:
159293 packets received
2016 packets to unknown port received.
153899 packet receive errors
185342 packets sent
On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors,
which I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows,
that proxy is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty
basic config, but I can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls
per second. I would expect to be able to do a lot more than that. So I
was trying to make sure that no unnecessary udp traffic was going in or
out.
The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors,
4 Gb of RAM, running
CentOS
5 x86_64.
Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting
if someone wants to look into it.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no
longer supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date:
5/18/2008
9:31 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
http://www.asipto.com
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
29 Oct
29 Oct
9:50 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio 1.4.2 rev_dns=no
Reopening an old issue from May -- I installed 1.4.2 from SVN and have the
reverse DNS lookups going again, even though dns=no and rev_dns=no.
Was there a syntax change in the config file?
Daniel, you were correct that "somewhere in the script you do an IP
comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between quotes"
-- I have one carrier who insists on sending ";npdi=yes" in the user portion
of the URI:
INVITE sip:+1303XXXXXXXX;npdi=yes@4.X.X.X:5060
And that blows up ENUM lookups (or at least it did in version 1.3). So I
have in my config a block like this:
if (src_ip=~".*1\.2\.3\.") {
strip_tail(9);
xlog("L_INFO", "NOTICE: Stripped npdi because carrier X is stupid:
new URI $ru\n");
}
Maybe there is a better way to do this so I am not searching by src_ip?
Michael Young
(IP addresses have been changed\munged to protect the guilty)
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Michael Young
Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Hello,
please try the attached patch (is for devel but should apply on 1.3.2, if
no, let me know and I send you another). Similar issue was reported to me
some time ago, started to investigate but at some point I forgot about. I
think you face the same case: somewhere in the script you do an IP
comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between quotes.
The patch fixed the reverse dns in this case if rev_dns=no. I will look more
into it to find a better solution -- detecting if the value is an IP address
and avoid DNS lookup, a.s.o, for IP comparisons.
Let me know the results.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/18/08 22:12, Michael Young wrote:
Here is why I ask:
[root@proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
Udp:
159293 packets received
2016 packets to unknown port received.
153899 packet receive errors
185342 packets sent
On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors,
which I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows,
that proxy is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty
basic config, but I can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls
per second. I would expect to be able to do a lot more than that. So I
was trying to make sure that no unnecessary udp traffic was going in or
out.
The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors, 4 Gb of RAM, running
CentOS
5 x86_64.
Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting
if someone wants to look into it.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no
longer supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date:
5/18/2008
9:31 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
http://www.asipto.com
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
30 Oct
30 Oct
6:41 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio 1.4.2 rev_dns=no
Hello,
On 10/30/08 03:50, Michael Young wrote:
Reopening an old issue from May -- I installed 1.4.2
from SVN and have the
reverse DNS lookups going again, even though dns=no and rev_dns=no.
Was there a syntax change in the config file?
Daniel, you were correct that "somewhere in the script you do an IP
comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between quotes"
-- I have one carrier who insists on sending ";npdi=yes" in the user portion
of the URI:
INVITE sip:+1303XXXXXXXX;npdi=yes@4.X.X.X:5060
And that blows up ENUM lookups (or at least it did in version 1.3). So I
have in my config a block like this:
if (src_ip=~".*1\.2\.3\.") {
strip_tail(9);
xlog("L_INFO", "NOTICE: Stripped npdi because carrier X is stupid:
new URI $ru\n");
}
you can check if the npdi is in the username part of the R-URI and
remove it from there, it will work all the time, not only if the request
comes from some IP range.
if(uri=~";npdi =yes@")
You can then use strip or transformations to do that:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/transformations:1.4.x
Cheers,
Daniel
Maybe there is a better way to do this so I am not
searching by src_ip?
Michael Young
(IP addresses have been changed\munged to protect the guilty)
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Michael Young
Cc: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
Hello,
please try the attached patch (is for devel but should apply on 1.3.2, if
no, let me know and I send you another). Similar issue was reported to me
some time ago, started to investigate but at some point I forgot about. I
think you face the same case: somewhere in the script you do an IP
comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between quotes.
The patch fixed the reverse dns in this case if rev_dns=no. I will look more
into it to find a better solution -- detecting if the value is an IP address
and avoid DNS lookup, a.s.o, for IP comparisons.
Let me know the results.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/18/08 22:12, Michael Young wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
Here is why I ask:
[root@proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
Udp:
159293 packets received
2016 packets to unknown port received.
153899 packet receive errors
185342 packets sent
On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors,
which I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows,
that proxy is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty
basic config, but I can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls
per second. I would expect to be able to do a lot more than that. So I
was trying to make sure that no unnecessary udp traffic was going in or
out.
The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors,
4 Gb of RAM, running
CentOS
5 x86_64.
Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting
if someone wants to look into it.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
dns=no
rev_dns=no
but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no
longer supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
Michael Young
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date:
5/16/2008
7:42 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date:
5/18/2008
9:31 AM
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
http://www.asipto.com
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
9:31 AM
5906
days inactive
6074
days old
10 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Daniel Cardoso Alves -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Jesus Rodriguez -
Michael Young -
Ricardo Alves Ferreira Silva