12 May
2008
12 May
'08
7:01 a.m.
Dear All:
I want to use SER's Presence module to do presence server , but someone say it's
not stable , so ,
1. Does anyone could tell me why it doesn't stable ? because it looks work after
i do some testing with eyebeam.
2. how does openser's presence ? is it better than SER's presence ?
thanks,
allan
DISCLAIMER:
Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.
13 May
13 May
11:31 a.m.
Hi Allan,
the presence server is called 'unstable' because it was not tested much.
I tested it with EyeBeam and some other clients very long time ago and it seemed
to be working that time, but I haven't tested it so much to be able to say that
it is really stable. And I'm afraid a bit of changes in core since that time.
I don't know much about OpenSER presence so I can speak only for SER. SER's
presence modules implementation is done according drafts before RFCs were
released so it can differ a bit from RFC specification. But I hope not too much
because that were some later draft versions (mentioned somewhere in docs).
with regards,
Vaclav
On Po, kvě 12, 2008 at 12:01:38 +0800, Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 ) wrote:
Dear All:
I want to use SER's Presence module to do presence server , but someone say it's
not stable , so ,
1. Does anyone could tell me why it doesn't stable ? because it looks work after
i do some testing with eyebeam.
2. how does openser's presence ? is it better than SER's presence ?
thanks,
allan
DISCLAIMER:
Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
14 May
14 May
5:36 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] 回覆: Presence Server
Dear Vaclav:
Thanks for your respond ,
BR,
Allan
-----原始郵件-----
寄件者: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] 代理 Vaclav
Kubart
寄件日期: 2008年5月13日 下午 04:32
收件者: Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 )
副本: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
主旨: Re: [Serusers] Presence Server
Hi Allan,
the presence server is called 'unstable' because it was not tested much.
I tested it with EyeBeam and some other clients very long time ago and it seemed to be
working that time, but I haven't tested it so much to be able to say that it is really
stable. And I'm afraid a bit of changes in core since that time.
I don't know much about OpenSER presence so I can speak only for SER. SER's
presence modules implementation is done according drafts before RFCs were released so it
can differ a bit from RFC specification. But I hope not too much because that were some
later draft versions (mentioned somewhere in docs).
with regards,
Vaclav
On Po, kvě 12, 2008 at 12:01:38 +0800, Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 ) wrote:
Dear All:
I want to use SER's Presence module to do presence server , but someone say it's
not stable , so ,
1. Does anyone could tell me why it doesn't stable ? because it looks work after
i do some testing with eyebeam.
2. how does openser's presence ? is it better than SER's presence ?
thanks,
allan
DISCLAIMER:
Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
DISCLAIMER:
Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.
6040
days inactive
6042
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 ) -
Vaclav Kubart