Hi Tung
As you know Mediaproxy is written in Python, Python does not really support proper threading as it still has a global lock on the data dictionary.
This means that a SMP machine really does not help in fact because of the CPU switching it will probable perform to a lower level.
I would switch your machines make your test machine your production and then buy a second machine of the same spec and use the SRV record load balancing to give you both higher performance and redundancy.
All in all your better off having 3 or 4 machine than one machine in the long term any :)
Cheers Mike
Tung Tran wrote:
On 7/30/07, Tung Tran tr.tung@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tran
You mean to say Media proxy with single processor
can handle 400 concurrent sessions, that very high compare to rtpproxy
can some one confirm, is the same case in production ?
ram
Hi,
I´ve seen rtpproxy with more then 400 concurrent session, without any problems.. so I know rtpproxy can do it :) (not sure about mediaproxy though)
- Atle * ram talk2ram@gmail.com [070730 10:15]:
On 7/30/07, Atle Samuelsen clona@cyberhouse.no wrote:
400 sessions in Single server ?
what config
ram
* Tung Tran tr.tung@gmail.com [070730 12:18]: Hi Tung,
try sipp (sipp.sf.net) It has a rtppacket echo generator thing.. so, if you make a scenario and just call via your sip-server etc.. make sure the calls gets mediaproxied.. you can get rather good stats out from it. (I think)
-Atle