6 Feb
2007
6 Feb
'07
12:08 p.m.
Hey Guys,
Is it mandatory for SIP servers to generate to UA 180 Ringing to inform
them that the called party is now ringing ?
The reason i'm asking is because I am seeing strange results using
different UAs.
Using SIP clients to call out , instead of seeing 180 Ringing , i see
183 session progress even before call was picked up.
On some sip client , ring back can be heard.
On some others , ring back cannot be heard.
Is there any reason to suspect that these UAs needs to receive 180
Ringing before generating any ringback ?
Regards,
Sam
6 Feb
6 Feb
12:17 p.m.
Hi Sam,
* Sam Lee <sam.lee(a)super.net.sg> [070206 11:09]:
Hey Guys,
Is it mandatory for SIP servers to generate to UA 180 Ringing to inform
them that the called party is now ringing ?
No
The reason i'm asking is because I am seeing strange results using
different UAs.
Using SIP clients to call out , instead of seeing 180 Ringing , i see
183 session progress even before call was picked up.
This is nothing wrong with this :)
On some sip client , ring back can be heard.
good, they support early media
On some others , ring back cannot be heard.
Bad,, they do not support Early media
Is there any reason to suspect that these UAs needs to receive 180
Ringing before generating any ringback ?
In general:
180 == Generate Local Ringback.
183 == get RTP from callee, and play it (often used for network
announcements, calls to gSM and simular)
- Atle
Regards,
Sam
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
1:06 p.m.
Also note that on ISDN/SIP gateways, you often have many options to
fine-tune this. Like progress indicators mappings, play local tone or
just forward distant, etc.
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:17 +0100, Atle Samuelsen wrote:
Hi Sam,
* Sam Lee <sam.lee(a)super.net.sg> [070206 11:09]:
Hey Guys,
Is it mandatory for SIP servers to generate to UA 180 Ringing to inform
them that the called party is now ringing ?
No
The reason i'm asking is because I am seeing strange results using
different UAs.
Using SIP clients to call out , instead of seeing 180 Ringing , i see
183 session progress even before call was picked up.
This is nothing wrong with this :)
On some sip client , ring back can be heard.
good, they support early media
On some others , ring back cannot be heard.
Bad,, they do not support Early media
Is there any reason to suspect that these UAs needs to receive 180
Ringing before generating any ringback ?
In general:
180 == Generate Local Ringback.
183 == get RTP from callee, and play it (often used for network
announcements, calls to gSM and simular)
- Atle
Regards,
Sam
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users 
2:56 p.m.
And it is also common that a gateway sends both - 180 (ISDN Alerting)
and 183 (ISDN Progress with inband audio available)
regards
klaus
Jerome Martin wrote:
Also note that on ISDN/SIP gateways, you often have
many options to
fine-tune this. Like progress indicators mappings, play local tone or
just forward distant, etc.
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:17 +0100, Atle Samuelsen wrote:
--
Klaus Darilion
nic.at
Hi Sam,
* Sam Lee <sam.lee(a)super.net.sg> [070206 11:09]:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Hey Guys,
Is it mandatory for SIP servers to generate to UA 180 Ringing to inform
them that the called party is now ringing ?
No
The reason i'm asking is because I am seeing strange results using
different UAs.
Using SIP clients to call out , instead of seeing 180 Ringing , i see
183 session progress even before call was picked up.
This is nothing wrong with
this :)
On some sip client , ring back can be heard.
good, they support early media
On some others , ring back cannot be heard.
Bad,, they do not support Early media
Is there any reason to suspect that these UAs needs to receive 180
Ringing before generating any ringback ?
In general:
180 == Generate Local Ringback.
183 == get RTP from callee, and play it (often used for network
announcements, calls to gSM and simular)
- Atle
Regards,
Sam
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
3:07 p.m.
Hi
* Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> [070206 13:56]:
And it is also common that a gateway sends both - 180
(ISDN Alerting) and 183 (ISDN Progress with inband audio available)
note: CAN send
both :)
- Atle
regards
klaus
Jerome Martin wrote:
Also note that on ISDN/SIP gateways, you often
have many options to
fine-tune this. Like progress indicators mappings, play local tone or
just forward distant, etc.
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:17 +0100, Atle Samuelsen wrote:
--
Klaus Darilion
nic.at
Hi Sam,
* Sam Lee <sam.lee(a)super.net.sg> [070206 11:09]:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Hey Guys,
Is it mandatory for SIP servers to generate to UA 180 Ringing to inform
them that the called party is now ringing ?
No
The reason i'm asking is because I am seeing
strange results using
different UAs.
Using SIP clients to call out , instead of seeing 180 Ringing , i see
183 session progress even before call was picked up.
This is nothing wrong with this
:)
On some sip client , ring back can be heard.
good, they support early media
On some others , ring back cannot be heard.
Bad,, they do not support Early media
Is there any reason to suspect that these UAs
needs to receive 180
Ringing before generating any ringback ?
In general: 180 == Generate Local
Ringback.
183 == get RTP from callee, and play it (often used for network
announcements, calls to gSM and simular)
- Atle
Regards,
Sam
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
7 Feb
7 Feb
4:13 a.m.
Hmm. I tried tweaking the Progress Indic.
Doesn't help much.
I read the tech notes for the gateway. They don't seem to generate 180
Ringing at all. All call flows shows only 183 Session Progress.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerome Martin [mailto:jmartin@longphone.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:07 PM
To: Atle Samuelsen
Cc: Sam Lee; users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] 180 Ringing / 183 Session Progress
Also note that on ISDN/SIP gateways, you often have many options to
fine-tune this. Like progress indicators mappings, play local tone or
just forward distant, etc.
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:17 +0100, Atle Samuelsen wrote:
Hi Sam,
* Sam Lee <sam.lee(a)super.net.sg> [070206 11:09]:
Hey Guys,
Is it mandatory for SIP servers to generate to UA 180 Ringing to
inform them that the called party is now ringing ?
No
The reason i'm asking is because I am seeing strange results using
different UAs.
Using SIP clients to call out , instead of seeing 180 Ringing , i
see
183 session progress even before call was picked up.
This is nothing wrong with this :)
On some sip client , ring back can be heard.
good, they support early media
On some others , ring back cannot be heard.
Bad,, they do not support Early media
Is there any reason to suspect that these UAs needs to receive 180
Ringing before generating any ringback ?
In general:
180 == Generate Local Ringback.
183 == get RTP from callee, and play it (often used for network
announcements, calls to gSM and simular)
- Atle
Regards,
Sam
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6501
days inactive
6502
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Atle Samuelsen -
Jerome Martin -
Klaus Darilion -
Sam Lee