Add
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
Somewhere in ur route (before relay but after loose_route)
do u have loose_route anyway ?
________________________________
From: users-bounces@openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf Of Script Head Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:44 PM To: users@openser.org Subject: Re: [Users] forcing rtpproxy on a call
Now that my rtpproxy actually passes traffic I stumbled on another problem. When the called party hangs up the call (asterisk command Hangup()) the soft phone remains connected. Yet, when I click the Hangup button on the softphone, SER receives BYE messages.
On 3/9/06, Vitaly Nikolaev vnikolaev@intermedia.net wrote:
Looks like forward includes relay in it. And by putting force_rtpproxy AFTER forward you does not give it a chance :-) on_reply route is also MUST be there.
________________________________
From: users-bounces@openser.org [mailto: users-bounces@openser.org mailto:users-bounces@openser.org ] On Behalf Of Script Head Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:59 PM To: users@openser.org Subject: Re: [Users] forcing rtpproxy on a call
Thank you guys, it's working now.
Apparently, rewritehostport("<ip>:<port>") works great with rptproxy while forward does exactly that, forwards the call to the destination bypassing the force_rtp_proxy request. This should be documented somewhere.
ScriptHead
On 3/9/06, Vitaly Nikolaev vnikolaev@intermedia.net wrote:
1. I never used forward, see my example, I do not know if it actually relay call or not 2. if you do not have NAT between client and server you do not need force_rport, and try to avoid any nat_uac_test, etc if you are actually working on private ips without nat 3. you MUST enable proxy also for reply
route[x] {
.....
force_rtp_proxy();
t_on_reply("1");
rewritehostport("x.x.x.x:5060");
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
onreply_route[1] {
if (!(status=~"183" || status=~"200"))
break;
force_rtp_proxy("");
}
________________________________
From: users-bounces@openser.org [mailto: users-bounces@openser.org mailto:users-bounces@openser.org ] On Behalf Of Script Head Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:29 PM To: users@openser.org Subject: [Users] forcing rtpproxy on a call
Hello everyone,
I am trying to debug why my rtpproxy isn't working. I have the following setup, on my LAN.
softphone (192.168.1.100) -> openser/rtpproxy ( 192.168.1.10 http://192.168.1.10 ) -> asterisk (192.168.1.12)
The rtpproxy is running and I see commands flying thru it.
the following route works
if(method=="INVITE") { if(uri=~"^sip:[0-9]{6}1[0-9]*{10}@") {
forward(192.168.1.12,5060);
}; }
when I replace it with this route
if(method=="INVITE") { if(uri=~"^sip:[0-9]{6}1[0-9]*{10}@") {
forward(192.168.1.12,5060);
}; force_rport(); force_rtp_proxy(); }
I get dead air while asterisk logs show that my test message is playing. How should I proceed to debug this?
ScriptHead
I created a setup on my LAN with that works great and forwards BYE all the way to the soft phone. I verified via tcpdump that RTP is flowing via the proxy. When I move this setup to the public Internet, it works as well, except the BYE isn't getting forwarded. The config file is attached.
On 3/10/06, Vitaly Nikolaev vnikolaev@intermedia.net wrote:
Add
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
Somewhere in ur route (before relay but after loose_route)
do u have loose_route anyway ?
*From:* users-bounces@openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] *On Behalf Of *Script Head *Sent:* Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:44 PM *To:* users@openser.org
*Subject:* Re: [Users] forcing rtpproxy on a call
Now that my rtpproxy actually passes traffic I stumbled on another problem. When the called party hangs up the call (asterisk command Hangup()) the soft phone remains connected. Yet, when I click the Hangup button on the softphone, SER receives BYE messages.
On 3/9/06, *Vitaly Nikolaev* vnikolaev@intermedia.net wrote:
Looks like forward includes relay in it. And by putting force_rtpproxy AFTER forward you does not give it a chance J on_reply route is also MUST be there.
*From:* users-bounces@openser.org [mailto: users-bounces@openser.org] *On Behalf Of *Script Head
*Sent:* Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:59 PM *To:* users@openser.org
*Subject:* Re: [Users] forcing rtpproxy on a call
Thank you guys, it's working now.
Apparently, rewritehostport("<ip>:<port>") works great with rptproxy while forward does exactly that, forwards the call to the destination bypassing the force_rtp_proxy request. This should be documented somewhere.
ScriptHead
On 3/9/06, *Vitaly Nikolaev* vnikolaev@intermedia.net wrote:
- I never used forward, see my example, I do not know if it
actually relay call or not 2. if you do not have NAT between client and server you do not need force_rport, and try to avoid any nat_uac_test, etc if you are actually working on private ips without nat 3. you MUST enable proxy also for reply
route[x] {
…..
force_rtp_proxy();
t_on_reply("1");
rewritehostport("x.x.x.x:5060");
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
onreply_route[1] {
if (!(status=~"183" || status=~"200")) break; force_rtp_proxy("");
}
*From:* users-bounces@openser.org [mailto: users-bounces@openser.org] *On Behalf Of *Script Head
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:29 PM *To:* users@openser.org *Subject:* [Users] forcing rtpproxy on a call
Hello everyone,
I am trying to debug why my rtpproxy isn't working. I have the following setup, on my LAN.
softphone (192.168.1.100) -> openser/rtpproxy ( 192.168.1.10) -> asterisk (192.168.1.12)
The rtpproxy is running and I see commands flying thru it.
the following route works
if(method=="INVITE") { if(uri=~"^sip:[0-9]{6}1[0-9]*{10}@") { forward(192.168.1.12,5060); }; }
when I replace it with this route
if(method=="INVITE") { if(uri=~"^sip:[0-9]{6}1[0-9]*{10}@") { forward(192.168.1.12,5060); }; force_rport(); force_rtp_proxy(); }
I get dead air while asterisk logs show that my test message is playing. How should I proceed to debug this?
ScriptHead