31 Aug
2005
31 Aug
'05
5:27 p.m.
Hi!
I checked how SER would behave with large Max-Forwards values.
Paragraph 20.22 of RFC 3261 notes Max-Forwards to be anywhere between 0
and 255 but SER lacks a check for the upper boundry in the maxfwd module.
I'm not sure how the correct way to remove the broken header field and
introducing a correct one would be so I leave this for somebody who
knows :)
Hendrik
--
freenet Cityline GmbH, Hamburger Chaussee 2-4, 24114 Kiel, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)431 9020552, Fax: +49 (0)431 9020559
Internet: http://www.freenet.de, eMail: hendrik.scholz(a)freenet-ag.de
1 Sep
1 Sep
11:04 a.m.
On 31-08-2005 16:27, Hendrik Scholz wrote:
Hi!
I checked how SER would behave with large Max-Forwards values.
Paragraph 20.22 of RFC 3261 notes Max-Forwards to be anywhere between 0
and 255 but SER lacks a check for the upper boundry in the maxfwd module.
I'm not sure how the correct way to remove the broken header field and
introducing a correct one would be so I leave this for somebody who
knows :)
There is the possibility to limit the maximum Max-Forwards value in
SER. Maxfwd modules has the parameter called max_limit. If SER
receives a message with Max-Forwards value larger than the value of
the parameter then it will be automatically lowered.
Jan.
7022
days inactive
7023
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Hendrik Scholz -
Jan Janak