Undocummented code = non existing code (for almomst everyone except the developer and few guys reading the devel list, updating the working copy of the CVS, and checking the new code).....I know it is unpleasant, but two lines with an overview is not asking too much.....isn't it?
my contribution,
Samuel.
Unclassified.
Jan Janak jan@iptel.org 06/21/05 11:58AM >>>
On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Greger V. Teigre writes:
Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as complete as possible nowleading up to the release!!
nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes. tm module README seems to lack description of several exported functions.
these both are example of bad iptel.org policy. no new features should be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation is updated.
Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented code or having no code ?
Jan.
_______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-
Samuel Osorio Calvo