23 Sep
2004
23 Sep
'04
10:03 a.m.
The problem is that ser doesn't find any user in usrloc, because when
registering from my Cisco Phones the username in the usrloc database is
always "user@ip_adress_of_ser". I want "user@domain".
A problem of the Cisco 7905G Phones is, that they always use the
adress/ip of the sip proxy as domain.
Using my domain name as proxy adress in the phones is not possible
because the domain name has no dns entry
pointing at my SER Server.
That has been removed for almost 10 months already. The domain part is
always used
in registrar module.
So long as you set use_domain=0 in the following modules, I don't
foresee any
significant impact to your routing
logic.
- auth_db
- auth_diameter
- group
- group_radius
- uri_db
- usrloc
- vm (non CVS HEAD version)
Regards,
Zeus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
> [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Jankowski, Jan
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2004 9:34 PM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] No use_domain in cvs registrar?
>
>
> Hi Serusers,
>
> there seems to be no "use_domain" option in the cvs version
> of registrar anymore. I need ...."use_domain", 0) and ser
> says "parameter <use_domain> not found in module
> <registrar>". Am I too stupid or did you remove this feature? Why?
>
> With ser-0.8.14 everything was fine :-/
>
> Jan Jankowski
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
23 Sep
23 Sep
4:28 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] No use_domain in cvs registrar?
Would alias=ip_address_of_ser help?
Zeus
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Jankowski, Jan
Sent: Thursday, 23 September 2004 5:04 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: AW: [Serusers] No use_domain in cvs registrar?
The problem is that ser doesn't find any user in usrloc,
because when registering from my Cisco Phones the username in
the usrloc database is always "user@ip_adress_of_ser". I want
"user@domain".
A problem of the Cisco 7905G Phones is, that they always use
the adress/ip of the sip proxy as domain. Using my domain
name as proxy adress in the phones is not possible because
the domain name has no dns entry pointing at my SER Server.
That has been removed for almost 10 months already. The
domain part is
always used in registrar module.
So long as you set use_domain=0 in the following modules, I don't
foresee any
significant impact to your routing
logic.
- auth_db
- auth_diameter
- group
- group_radius
- uri_db
- usrloc
- vm (non CVS HEAD version)
Regards,
Zeus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]
> On Behalf Of Jankowski, Jan
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2004 9:34 PM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] No use_domain in cvs registrar?
>
>
> Hi Serusers,
>
> there seems to be no "use_domain" option in the cvs version of
> registrar anymore. I need ...."use_domain", 0) and ser says
> "parameter <use_domain> not found in module <registrar>". Am I
too
> stupid or did you remove this feature? Why?
>
> With ser-0.8.14 everything was fine :-/
>
> Jan Jankowski
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
28 Sep
28 Sep
3:19 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ser Register Problem
Dear All,
I have the latest ser (0.8.14) on fedora 2 as the sip server ,1 Mitel sip
phone and xpro soft phone as the sip phones. The problem is that either
the mitel or xpro sip phones can't register in ser.
I used "serctl ul show",nothing is registered.
I used "sipsak -vv -s sip:6000@ip address of sipserver",it shows "SIP/2.0
404 Not Found"
Then I added some log functions in ser.cfg where route locates (listed
below).I found out when I used "sipsak -vv -s sip:6000@ip address of
sipserver",the log functions execute first at uri==myself, then
(!lookup("location")) and I can see the logs in the terminal.
But when I started the phone to communicate with the ser, those logs
weren't show although I did see the register request from sip phones to
ser from ngrep.
So my first question is when the ser.cfg is executed. When I used sipsak,
I could see ser.cfg is executed. When I started the sip phone, I can't see
its execution.
My second question is how to find out the reason for not registering. I
used the IP address for the domain name. is it right to use? Because I did
the test in local area network without dns.
route{
log(1,"Begin route\n");
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
log(1,"Too many hops\n");
break;
};
if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
log(1,"Message too big\n");
break;
};
record_route();
log(1,"record_route\n");
# loose-route processing
if (loose_route()) {
t_relay();
log(1,"loose route\n");
break;
};
if (uri==myself) {
log(1,"in the served domain");
if (method=="REGISTER") {
log(1,"do the register work");
#Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("Ip address of sip server",
"subscriber")) {
www_challenge("Ip address of sip server",
"0");
log(1,"do www_challenge");
break;
};
save("location");
log(1,"save in the location");
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
log(1,"not found in the location");
break;
};
}else{
log(1,"not in the domain");
};
# forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that
# works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
Thanks,
Yilan
7:37 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ser Register Problem
Couple of things to try....
1 - Check out xlog() so you can print out the URI, Contact, etc.
2 - Are you beheind NAT?
3 - This is all you should be concerend about... What is the last log
message you are getting from here? Then use xlog() to tell you what you
need to know. If you are not even getting the first log message then SER is
not aware that it is supposed to respond for whatever the REGISTER has
requested. You will need to add it as an "alias" global config option at
the top of the file.
if (uri==myself) {
log(1,"in the served domain");
if (method=="REGISTER") {
log(1,"do the register work");
#Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("Ip address of sip server",
"subscriber")) {
www_challenge("Ip address of
sip server",
"0");
log(1,"do www_challenge");
break;
};
save("location");
log(1,"save in the location");
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using
our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
log(1,"not found in the location");
break;
};
}else{
log(1,"not in the domain");
};
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
> [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of yilan(a)cs.dal.ca
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 7:19 PM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] Ser Register Problem
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have the latest ser (0.8.14) on fedora 2 as the sip server
> ,1 Mitel sip
> phone and xpro soft phone as the sip phones. The problem is
> that either
> the mitel or xpro sip phones can't register in ser.
>
> I used "serctl ul show",nothing is registered.
>
> I used "sipsak -vv -s sip:6000@ip address of sipserver",it
> shows "SIP/2.0
> 404 Not Found"
>
> Then I added some log functions in ser.cfg where route locates (listed
> below).I found out when I used "sipsak -vv -s sip:6000@ip address of
> sipserver",the log functions execute first at uri==myself, then
> (!lookup("location")) and I can see the logs in the terminal.
>
> But when I started the phone to communicate with the ser, those logs
> weren't show although I did see the register request from sip
> phones to
> ser from ngrep.
>
> So my first question is when the ser.cfg is executed. When I
> used sipsak,
> I could see ser.cfg is executed. When I started the sip
> phone, I can't see
> its execution.
>
> My second question is how to find out the reason for not
> registering. I
> used the IP address for the domain name. is it right to use?
> Because I did
> the test in local area network without dns.
>
> route{
>
> log(1,"Begin route\n");
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> log(1,"Too many hops\n");
> break;
> };
> if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
> log(1,"Message too big\n");
> break;
> };
>
> record_route();
> log(1,"record_route\n");
> # loose-route processing
> if (loose_route()) {
> t_relay();
> log(1,"loose route\n");
> break;
> };
>
if (uri==myself) {
log(1,"in the served domain");
if (method=="REGISTER") {
log(1,"do the register work");
#Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("Ip address of sip server",
"subscriber")) {
www_challenge("Ip address of
sip server",
"0");
log(1,"do www_challenge");
break;
};
save("location");
log(1,"save in the location");
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using
our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
log(1,"not found in the location");
break;
};
}else{
log(1,"not in the domain");
};
> # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding;
that
> # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> };
>
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Yilan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
9:23 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SIP Books
Hi all.
I would like to buy a good book about SIP.
I have read in this list that "Internet Communication Using SIP: Delivering
VoIP and Multimedia Services with Session Initiation Protocol" by Henry
Sinnreich and Alan B. Johnston is a really good one.
Does anyone know another better ?
Thanks in advance.
Kiko
PS: please, someone answers my previous post which ask if with NATHELPER +
RTPROXY is possible to establish videoconference sessions and not only audio
sessions and if this is solved with Mediaproxy.
A bunch of thanks !
5:58 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SIP Books
The RFC's and experience have been worth way more to me than any book. The
RFC's are not a good place to start but good for finding the "official"
answer. Try www.voip-info.com and the www.iptel.org site has a good SIP
primer too. The rest of your learning will come from ngrep :)
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Kiko Vives
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 1:24 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] SIP Books
Hi all.
I would like to buy a good book about SIP.
I have read in this list that "Internet Communication Using
SIP: Delivering
VoIP and Multimedia Services with Session Initiation
Protocol" by Henry
Sinnreich and Alan B. Johnston is a really good one.
Does anyone know another better ?
Thanks in advance.
Kiko
PS: please, someone answers my previous post which ask if
with NATHELPER +
RTPROXY is possible to establish videoconference sessions and
not only audio
sessions and if this is solved with Mediaproxy.
A bunch of thanks !
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7363
days inactive
7368
days old
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Jankowski, Jan -
Kiko Vives -
Michael Shuler -
yilan＠cs.dal.ca -
Zeus Ng