Hi Henning,

Henning Westerholt wrote:

On Wednesday 14 March 2007 13:19, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

...

Hi everybody,

based on the newly 1.2.0 OpenSER release, we ran some tests in order to give some realistic numbers about the performances of OpenSER. I think it is a very useful information for our community or other interested people. [..]

First of all congratulation to the successful release!

thanks you.

The numbers from your tests looks really good, over 8000 request per second with standard hardware is very impressive.

This is a common mistake (no offence :) ) - we got 8000 *CALLS* per second, where a call is formed of INVITE + reply + ACK + BYE + reply (see call-related section). For simple transactions for second, we got 15000 - a transaction is counted as request + reply.

I notice in several other tests this confusion about a call and transaction - and that was why we decided to do separate tests for each, to avoid any doubts about what actually was measured.

Have you run some of the tests against e.g 1.1 or 0.9.5, to see how fast is the old version in comparison to the new code?

unfortunately no, because of time restrains :(

Also, nice documentation work, it should be easy to reproduce the test with other hardware or another release.

regards, Bogdan

Hi Andy,

Andy Davidson wrote:

On 14 Mar 2007, at 12:19, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

...

based on the newly 1.2.0 OpenSER release, we ran some tests in order to give some realistic numbers about the performances of OpenSER. I think it is a very useful information for our community or other interested people.

http://www.openser.org/mos/view/News/NewsItem/OpenSER-1.2.0---Perfomance-Tes...

I'm not trying to stir up trouble (honest), but it would be useful to people who are new to [Open]SER if you published performance results for your new stable release against the current stable release of SER.

to be honest I do not intend to do it and I do found it unethical to run tests against other similar projects - I do not have the enough knowledge or understanding to run relevant tests for other softwares than openser.

we try to provide for the users the best info about openser - comparison and decision should be the users's taks ;)

regards, bogdan

Hello,

On 03/15/07 20:52, Scott Yagel wrote:

Hi,

Is there a document that outlines the syntax rules used in openser.cfg?

there is work ongoing to get such a document, but was not with very high priority so far. Now you get such details spread in several documents. The dokuwiki is the place where you get the core variables and functions (core cookbook), index for what modules exports, index for pseudo-variables and transformations. http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php

Cheers, Daniel

Thanks, Scott Yagel PacketCall, Inc. syagel@packetcall.net

---

Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Scott Yagel wrote:

I'm still looking for some help in understanding the syntax used in the cfg files, such as what the following statement fragment really is doing:

if(uri =~"^sip:[0-9]{10}@")

uri is the request URI of the request, e.g: INVITE sip:syagel@packetcall.net SIP/2.0 then uri would be "sip:syagel@packetcall.net"

=~ means regular expression comparison, thus the following regular expression will be applied and if it matches the if condition returns TRUE, otherwise false.

^sip:[0-9]{10}@ this is the regular expression. The uri must start (^) with "sip:". Then there must be 10 digits followed by an "@". In short: the username must be a 10 digit phone number.

regards klaus

etc, etc,

Is there a manual that interprets this in detail so that I can make changes to the checking of dialed digits, for example?

The cookbook has helped some, but I have not found this type of detail in it. Maybe I have just not looked in the right section?

Thanks,

Scott Yagel PacketCall, Inc. syagel@packetcall.net

---

Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Klaus,

Is this syntax documented anywhere?

For instance, I want to catch all 1xx (exactly 3 digits, starting with 1) and send them to the SEMS conference application. So would I use something like:

if(uri =~"^sip:1[0-9]{3}@") etc,etc

Thanks, Scott Yagel PacketCall, Inc. syagel@packetcall.net -----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:43 AM To: syagel@packetcall.net Cc: daniel@voice-system.ro; 'users openser.org' Subject: Re: [Users] config file syntax

Scott Yagel wrote:

I'm still looking for some help in understanding the syntax used in the

cfg

files, such as what the following statement fragment really is doing:

if(uri =~"^sip:[0-9]{10}@")

uri is the request URI of the request, e.g: INVITE sip:syagel@packetcall.net SIP/2.0 then uri would be "sip:syagel@packetcall.net"

=~ means regular expression comparison, thus the following regular expression will be applied and if it matches the if condition returns TRUE, otherwise false.

^sip:[0-9]{10}@ this is the regular expression. The uri must start (^) with "sip:". Then there must be 10 digits followed by an "@". In short: the username must be a 10 digit phone number.

regards klaus