22 Jul
2004
22 Jul
'04
7:15 p.m.
Arne :
Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
question, in every case nobody answered.
It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
the two.
Regards,
Gustavo Russo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer(a)ritstele.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
From the mediaproxy readme I understand the
advantages of being able to
have multiple mediaproxies.
(sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance,
Arne.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
23 Jul
23 Jul
2:21 a.m.
Both work :-)
- Atle
* Gustavo Russo <grusso(a)netex.com.ar> [040723 01:15]:
Arne :
Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
question, in every case nobody answered.
It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
the two.
Regards,
Gustavo Russo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer(a)ritstele.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
From the mediaproxy readme I understand the
advantages of being able to
have multiple mediaproxies.
(sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance,
Arne.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5:05 a.m.
Adrian and Dan described the main differences from nathelper module when
they announced mediaproxy, you can find the email in the archives of the
mailing list. You can also find some information on their webpage. What
additional comparison do you want ?
If it is not enough then try both of them, write some comparison and
send it to the list.
Regarding the directions of the projects, it would be better to have
just one module for NAT traversal, but we were unable to resolve some
conflicts between the two modules so we decided to include both of them
and give users the possibility to choose. Both modules do approximately
the same, mediaproxy is simpler to setup, nathelper gives you more
flexibility but is more complicated to setup.
Jan.
On 22-07 20:15, Gustavo Russo wrote:
Arne :
Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
question, in every case nobody answered.
It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
the two.
Regards,
Gustavo Russo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer(a)ritstele.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers From the mediaproxy readme I understand the
advantages of being able to
have multiple mediaproxies.
(sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance,
Arne.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7329
days inactive
7330
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Atle Samuelsen -
Gustavo Russo -
Jan Janak