Arne :
Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar question, in every case nobody answered.
It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing the two.
Regards, Gustavo Russo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Arne Scheffer" arne.scheffer@ritstele.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
have multiple mediaproxies. (sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance, Arne.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Both work :-)
- Atle
* Gustavo Russo grusso@netex.com.ar [040723 01:15]:
Arne :
Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar question, in every case nobody answered.
It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing the two.
Regards, Gustavo Russo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Arne Scheffer" arne.scheffer@ritstele.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
have multiple mediaproxies. (sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance, Arne.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Adrian and Dan described the main differences from nathelper module when they announced mediaproxy, you can find the email in the archives of the mailing list. You can also find some information on their webpage. What additional comparison do you want ?
If it is not enough then try both of them, write some comparison and send it to the list.
Regarding the directions of the projects, it would be better to have just one module for NAT traversal, but we were unable to resolve some conflicts between the two modules so we decided to include both of them and give users the possibility to choose. Both modules do approximately the same, mediaproxy is simpler to setup, nathelper gives you more flexibility but is more complicated to setup.
Jan.
On 22-07 20:15, Gustavo Russo wrote:
Arne :
Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar question, in every case nobody answered.
It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing the two.
Regards, Gustavo Russo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Arne Scheffer" arne.scheffer@ritstele.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
have multiple mediaproxies. (sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance, Arne.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Atle Samuelsen -
Gustavo Russo -
Jan Janak