26 Mar
2005
26 Mar
'05
10:52 p.m.
I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero, where would that
be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you suggesting a
config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? What
was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any versions of
ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can tell though my
config is pretty standard.Thanks much..
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM
To: Marian Dumitru
Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated
the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the replication
state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication flag and, as
Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to non-zero value which
is not correct.
Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that
would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location database
forever.
The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some
time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to
make the usr location simpler.
Jan.
On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote:
Matt,
You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if
the
contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB
column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would
say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0.
Or ???
If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the
replication flag is still set.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
>Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how long
before the
contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's
still there :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept
in
ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand
the timer checks every
60
seconds default to see who should be expired and
all. What I don't
understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for
replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there
something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+-------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| username | contact | expires
|
+--------------+--------------------------------------+-------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26
00:42:35 |
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26
01:24:58 |
+--------------+--------------------------------------+-------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
27 Mar
27 Mar
4:49 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
The module was named replicator and the code was never public available
because the code was non-free. The documentation behind it can be found in my
diploma thesis. As Jan already said it's history.
If you want to fix your running system just set all the replication values in
your database to zero and restart your SER. Its very unlikely that these
values were changed by SER at any time.
Nils
On Saturday 26 March 2005 22:52, Matt Schulte wrote:
I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero,
where would that
be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you suggesting a
config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? What
was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any versions of
ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can tell though my
config is pretty standard.Thanks much..
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM
To: Marian Dumitru
Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated
the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the replication
state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication flag and, as
Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to non-zero value which
is not correct.
Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that
would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location database
forever.
The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some
time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to
make the usr location simpler.
Jan.
On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote:
Matt,
You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if
the
contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB
column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would
say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0.
Or ???
If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever
remove the contact if the
replication flag is still set.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My
question is how long
before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's
still there :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept
in
ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks every
>60
>
>
>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't
>understand is why I keep getting these messages:
>
>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for
>replication
>
>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there
>something I'm missing?
>
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-------------
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>----+
>
>| username | contact | expires
>
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-------------
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>----+
>
>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26
>
>00:42:35 |
>
>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26
>
>01:24:58 |
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-------------
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>----+
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7187
days inactive
7188
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Matt Schulte -
Nils Ohlmeier