Hi! I beleive that *B2BUA is compatible with vovida in radius attributes part and should work fine with your billing. P.S. Anyway it *b2bua script is very simple and you can easy customise it for your needs.

Hello Alberto, Try to post also a logfile of b2bua ( -d -v keys). Saturday, July 23, 2005 2:22:36 AM, you wrote: AC> Thanks Mike, I really appreciate your feedback but I would AC> like to resolve the routing problem that I have at this time AC> before to skip to another solution. AC> My deployment is like this: AC> NatedUA --> SER+MEDIAPROXY <----> B2BUA AC> | AC> | AC> PSTN GW AC> The B2BUA is running in a separeted machine. AC> If the UA place a call and follow the progress of the call, AC> the call is completed without any trouble AC> If the UA place a call but then we decide to CANCEL the call AC> for any reason, the CALL continues in progress from SER to the AC> PSTN GW AC> Please I need help I really don't know what I'm doing wrong. AC> I guess I'm making a mistake in my routing configuration at AC> ser.cfg but I can't find where I already tried many things like AC> forwarding only INVITE and BYE from SER to B2BUA but It didn't AC> work neither. AC> I already posted my NGREP trace and my ser.cfg file at : AC> http://pastebin.ca/18313 AC> http://pastebin.ca/18314 AC> Regards AC> Alberto Cruz AC> mike(a)yes.net.ua wrote: AC> Hi! AC> I beleive that *B2BUA is compatible with vovida in radius attributes part AC> and should work fine with your billing. AC> P.S. Anyway it *b2bua script is very simple and you can easy customise it AC> for your needs. AC> Thanks for you recommendation. AC> The issue that I have is that we are using ALEPO as AC> Billing/Prepaid/Postpaid Platform. and they recommend us VOVIDA B2BUA AC> because the radius attributes format are compatibles betwen them. AC> It is because I need to use VOVIDA B2BUA. AC> If I change to other B2BUA like ASTERISK for example, we should to write AC> an additional interface in order the ALEPO could recive the radius AC> attribute as it expect. Maybe in the future we could do this but at this AC> time we have the time over us because we are already in production and AC> we need to solve the CANCEL issue. AC> Does anybody alse has a ser.cfg example for SER+MEDIAPROXY and VOVIDA AC> B2BUA? AC> Regards AC> Miguel Angel Villar wrote: AC> Alberto. AC> I tried VOVIDA B2BUA with SER+MEDIAPROXY some time ago and worked AC> fine. I stoped using it because I noticed the VOVIDA B2BUA had a poor AC> interface, any custom should be done in the code, so I had to recompile AC> after any change. Due to this I changed it for the Asterisk B2BUA, really AC> nice interface and works great with SER+MEDIAPROXY, you should try it. AC> *B2BUA: http://developer.berlios.de/projects/b2bua/*B2BUA AC> mailing list: AC> http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/b2bua-users*B2BUA AC> (installation AC> manual):http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/b2bua-users/2005-April/000047.htmlEnjoY. AC> MaV.- AC> -----Mensaje original----- AC> De: Alberto Cruz [SMTP:acruz@tekbrain.com] AC> Enviado el: Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 12:35 p.m. AC> Para: &#39;serusers(a)lists.iptel.org&#39; AC> Asunto: [Serusers] Does VOVIDA B2BUA works with SER+MEDIAPROXY? AC> Importancia: Alta AC> Hi does anybody is running SER+MEDIAPROXY and VOVIDA B2BUA? AC> Please I need help to handle the CANCEL message. AC> I've already try searching AC> thehttp://www.archivum.info/serusers@lists.iptel.org/ and AC> thehttp://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/ for any tip or AC> configuration AC> example but I didn't find anything. AC> Regards AC> Alberto Cruz AC> _______________________________________________ AC> Serusers mailing AC> listserusers@lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers AC> _______________________________________________ AC> Serusers mailing AC> listserusers@lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers AC> _______________________________________________ AC> Serusers mailing AC> listserusers@lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Mike Tkachuk