Hi,
In 0.9.x we have had the command "serctl ul show". The serctl tool seems to be non-functional in 2.0.0, could somehow explain how one is supposed to get list of in-memory contacts from the usrloc module in 2.0.0?
In general it would be nice to have some "migration guide" started in WiKi so that people could share information like this. Personally I've spend quite lot of time migrating my 0.9.6 config to 2.0.0 and have quite few tips to share.
Thanks for any hints!
-Maxim
Hi Maxim, Yes, excellent! Simon Miles is the editor of the migration guide. The outline has been started: http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/ser20MigrationGuide and he is working on getting his working group together (I think). Please see my separate announcement on a serdoc mailing list and consider subscribing :-) g-)
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
In 0.9.x we have had the command "serctl ul show". The serctl tool seems to be non-functional in 2.0.0, could somehow explain how one is supposed to get list of in-memory contacts from the usrloc module in 2.0.0?
In general it would be nice to have some "migration guide" started in WiKi so that people could share information like this. Personally I've spend quite lot of time migrating my 0.9.6 config to 2.0.0 and have quite few tips to share.
Thanks for any hints!
-Maxim _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
The old serctl (FIFO only) has been replaced by sercmd, while a new serctl, called serctl 2.0 (written in python) can be used for remote management. The command you are looking for is usrloc.dump (callable from both tools), but unfortunately: static void rpc_dump(rpc_t* rpc, void* c) { rpc->fault(c, 500, "Not Yet Implemented"); }
:-( I have noticed the same, but forgot about it. It's a useful tool for test servers, and I assume the intention was to implement it. Could you please register a ticket on it? g-)
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
In 0.9.x we have had the command "serctl ul show". The serctl tool seems to be non-functional in 2.0.0, could somehow explain how one is supposed to get list of in-memory contacts from the usrloc module in 2.0.0?
In general it would be nice to have some "migration guide" started in WiKi so that people could share information like this. Personally I've spend quite lot of time migrating my 0.9.6 config to 2.0.0 and have quite few tips to share.
Thanks for any hints!
-Maxim _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
just a personal opinion on this:
I think it's not just a useful tool but a required feature being able to know which users are registered.
Can we make it a required feature for 2.0?
Samuel.
2007/5/25, Greger V. Teigre greger@teigre.com:
The old serctl (FIFO only) has been replaced by sercmd, while a new serctl, called serctl 2.0 (written in python) can be used for remote management. The command you are looking for is usrloc.dump (callable from both tools), but unfortunately: static void rpc_dump(rpc_t* rpc, void* c) { rpc->fault(c, 500, "Not Yet Implemented"); }
:-( I have noticed the same, but forgot about it. It's a useful tool for test servers, and I assume the intention was to implement it. Could you please register a ticket on it? g-)
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
In 0.9.x we have had the command "serctl ul show". The serctl tool seems to be non-functional in 2.0.0, could somehow explain how one is supposed to get list of in-memory contacts from the usrloc module in 2.0.0?
In general it would be nice to have some "migration guide" started in WiKi so that people could share information like this. Personally I've spend quite lot of time migrating my 0.9.6 config to 2.0.0 and have quite few tips to share.
Thanks for any hints!
-Maxim _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
samuel wrote:
just a personal opinion on this:
I think it's not just a useful tool but a required feature being able to know which users are registered.
Can we make it a required feature for 2.0?
I fully agree with the above.
-Maxim
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
samuel wrote:
just a personal opinion on this:
I think it's not just a useful tool but a required feature being able to know which users are registered.
Can we make it a required feature for 2.0?
I fully agree with the above.
I will take care of this, I think I must have forgotten to implement or commit that function. Thanks for the report.
Jan.
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Jan Janak -
Maxim Sobolev -
samuel