31 Mar
2020
31 Mar
'20
8:53 p.m.
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
1 Apr
1 Apr
2:01 a.m.
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that
the Registrar is the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't
the PBX/registrar
have NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be
missing something.
Any suggestions on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper
module and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register
keepalive was working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK
and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting
$du and t_relay, and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I
also removed RTP config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2:12 a.m.
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2:14 a.m.
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and
since the proxy is the entry point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
2:33 a.m.
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:48 a.m.
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too
broad to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and
I doubt someone will present you with a final solution (there's business
support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register
method on the way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but
something is still not
right, and its only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to
do more debugging and see if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping something
sticks out that someone sees and can point me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is
the
entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working.
The
main issue is the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and
handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get ack and bye messages to make
it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions are not being used at the
right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to accomplish it. I
also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is
the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the
PBX/registrar have NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to be missing
something. Any suggestions on what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from
nathelper
module and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register
keepalive was working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK
and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting
$du
and t_relay, and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes.
I also
removed RTP config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:54 a.m.
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()* instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here,
unfortunately your question is
too broad to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default
and I doubt someone will present you with a final solution (there's
business support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for
Register method on the way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already
but something is still
not right, and its only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need
to do more debugging and see if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping something
sticks out that someone sees and can point me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is
the
entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working.
The
main issue is the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and
handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get ack and bye messages to make
it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions are not being used at the
right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to accomplish it. I
also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar
is the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the
PBX/registrar have NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to be missing
something. Any suggestions on what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from
nathelper
module and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register
keepalive was working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK
and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just
setting $du
and t_relay, and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes.
I also
removed RTP config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
5:27 a.m.
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with either. I’m not
asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try add_path_received() instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too broad
to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's business support, if you're looking for
that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>>
wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:58 p.m.
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send some
sip traffic captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but
registration works with
either. I’m not asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on
anything that needs attention, so I appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()* instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here,
unfortunately your question is
too broad to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default
and I doubt someone will present you with a final solution (there's
business support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for
Register method on the way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>
wrote:
Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
It did help, I read that a couple times already
but something is still
not right, and its only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need
to do more debugging and see if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping something
sticks out that someone sees and can point me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is
the
entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that
working. The
main issue is the routing of messages, utilizing
set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get ack and
bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions are
not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another
mechanism to accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the
natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar
is the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the
PBX/registrar have NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to be missing
something. Any suggestions on what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from
nathelper
module and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register
keepalive was working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK
and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is
working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just
setting $du
and t_relay, and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example, modified with above
changes. I also
removed RTP config as that is a non-issue.
>
> request_route {
> ……
> # FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
> setflag(FLT_PBX);
> route(NATDETECT);
> ……
>
> route[NATDETECT] {
> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> force_rport();
> set_contact_alias();
> nat_keepalive();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> route[WITHINDLG] {
> if (!has_totag()) return;
> if (loose_route()) {
> route(DLGURI);
> } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
> record_route();
> }
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> }
>
> if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
> route(PRESENCE);
> exit;
> }
> if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> if ( t_check_trans() ) {
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> } else {
> exit;
> }
> }
> sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
> exit;
> }
>
> route[NATMANAGE] {
> if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> set_contact_alias();
> } return;
> }
>
> route[DLGURI] {
> if(!isdsturiset()) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
>
> onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
> if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
> }
> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
>
> if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
>
>
> -dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2 Apr
2 Apr
7:45 p.m.
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(), keepalives are
not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as a result of
add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere in cfg script
with same result.
-dan
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send some sip traffic
captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with either. I’m not
asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try add_path_received() instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too broad
to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's business support, if you're looking for
that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>>
wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
8:14 p.m.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received
and rport params
as a result of add_path_received().
You don't need to alias the Contact (for registration) in the intermediary
proxy on the way to the non-colocated Registrar. Adding path should suffice.
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
I don't know, may be devs can tell. Personally, I prefer leaving the
keepalive mechanism altogether to the Registrar for better control and
granularity.
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:48 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
> I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
>
>
>
> For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(),
> keepalives are not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
>
>
>
> I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as
> a result of add_path_received().
>
>
>
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
>
>
>
> Test scenario -
>
> # Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
>
>
>
> route[NATDETECT] {
>
> force_rport();
> set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
> nat_keepalive();
> return;
> }
>
>
>
> I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere
> in cfg script with same result.
>
>
>
> -dan
>
>
>
> *From: *sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of
> Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
> *To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
>
>
>
> Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send
> some sip traffic captures and elaborate?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --Sergiu
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with
> either. I’m not asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on
> anything that needs attention, so I appreciate your pointers.
>
>
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()* instead of add_path()
>
>
>
> Good luck!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is
> too broad to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default
> and I doubt someone will present you with a final solution (there's
> business support, if you're looking for that).
>
>
>
> Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
>
> - try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for
> Register method on the way to the registrar
>
> - in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Sergiu
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
>
> It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not
> right, and its only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to
> do more debugging and see if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping something
> sticks out that someone sees and can point me in the right direction.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > Might this article be of aid?
> >
> >
>
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
> >
> > -- Alex
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
> >>
> >> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is
> the entry point.
> >>
> >> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working.
> The main issue is the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and
> handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get ack and bye messages to make
> it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions are not being used at the
> right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to accomplish it. I
> also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
> >>
> >> -dan
> >>
> >> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is
> the PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the
> PBX/registrar have NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> --Sergiu
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
> <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
> >> I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing
> something. Any suggestions on what is missing here?
> >>
> >> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from
> nathelper module and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
> registrar.
> >>
> >> I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register
> keepalive was working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK
> and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
> >>
> >> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
> >>
> >> Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting
> $du and t_relay, and is also working.
> >>
> >> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
> >>
> >> Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes.
> I also removed RTP config as that is a non-issue.
> >>
> >> request_route {
> >> ……
> >> # FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
> >> setflag(FLT_PBX);
> >> route(NATDETECT);
> >> ……
> >>
> >> route[NATDETECT] {
> >> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> >> force_rport();
> >> set_contact_alias();
> >> nat_keepalive();
> >> }
> >> return;
> >> }
> >>
> >> route[WITHINDLG] {
> >> if (!has_totag()) return;
> >> if (loose_route()) {
> >> route(DLGURI);
> >> } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> >> route(NATMANAGE);
> >> } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
> >> record_route();
> >> }
> >> route(RELAY);
> >> exit;
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
> >> route(PRESENCE);
> >> exit;
> >> }
> >> if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> >> if ( t_check_trans() ) {
> >> route(RELAY);
> >> exit;
> >> } else {
> >> exit;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
> >> exit;
> >> }
> >>
> >> route[NATMANAGE] {
> >> if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> >> handle_ruri_alias();
> >> }
> >> if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> >> set_contact_alias();
> >> } return;
> >> }
> >>
> >> route[DLGURI] {
> >> if(!isdsturiset()) {
> >> handle_ruri_alias();
> >> }
> >> return;
> >> }
> >>
> >> branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
> >> route(NATMANAGE);
> >> }
> >>
> >> onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
> >> if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
> >> route(NATMANAGE);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
> >> route(NATMANAGE);
> >>
> >> if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
> >>
> >>
> >> -dan
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> >> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
> >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
> >
> > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
> > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
9:59 p.m.
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()? The
second one updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for the
couple of local modules immediately, typically needed when having
dialog/presence module in that instance (still no changes to the header
itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact value should
be taken from a special field). The first one uses the lumps system that
makes the changes over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless
msg_apply_changes() is used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one
updated by set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with
nat_keepalive(), keepalives are not sent. Removing set_contact_alias()
fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params
as a result of add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias()
elsewhere in cfg script with same result.
-dan
*From: *sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of
Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send
some sip traffic captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works
with either. I’m not asking for a solution, just looking for
suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I appreciate your
pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com
<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()* instead
of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately
your question is too broad to answer and too little info,
the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone
will present you with a final solution (there's business
support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias)
just for Register method on the way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address
is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but
something is still not right, and its only because of
the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more
debugging and see if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping
something sticks out that someone sees and can point
me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com
<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W.
Graham
wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and
since
the proxy is the entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did
have that
working. The main issue is the routing of
messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and
handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get ack and
bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming
these functions are not being used at the right
locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag
and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my understanding is
that the
Registrar is the PBX, kamailio is acting as
an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have
NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to
be missing something. Any suggestions on what is
missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and
handle_ruri_alias() from
nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has since
broke. When
register keepalive was working, I was able
to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was
not being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using
add_path() and is
working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to the PBX,
that is
just setting $du and t_relay, and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example, modified
with above
changes. I also removed RTP config as that
is a non-issue.
>
> request_route {
> ……
> # FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
> setflag(FLT_PBX);
> route(NATDETECT);
> ……
>
> route[NATDETECT] {
> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> force_rport();
> set_contact_alias();
> nat_keepalive();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> route[WITHINDLG] {
> if (!has_totag()) return;
> if (loose_route()) {
> route(DLGURI);
> } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> } else if (
is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
>
record_route();
> }
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> }
>
> if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri ==
myself) {
> route(PRESENCE);
> exit;
> }
> if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> if ( t_check_trans() ) {
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> } else {
> exit;
> }
> }
> sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
> exit;
> }
>
> route[NATMANAGE] {
> if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> set_contact_alias();
> } return;
> }
>
> route[DLGURI] {
> if(!isdsturiset()) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
>
> onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
> if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
> }
> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
>
> if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
>
>
> -dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
11:11 p.m.
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
From: "miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>rg>,
Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()? The second one
updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for the couple of local modules
immediately, typically needed when having dialog/presence module in that instance (still
no changes to the header itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact value
should be taken from a special field). The first one uses the lumps system that makes the
changes over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is
used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one updated by
set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(), keepalives are
not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as a result of
add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere in cfg script
with same result.
-dan
From: sr-users
<sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>
on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas@gmail.com><mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send some sip traffic
captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with either. I’m not
asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try add_path_received() instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too broad
to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's business support, if you're looking for
that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>>
wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3 Apr
3 Apr
8:43 p.m.
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look for
fixing it. Now I read the full thread and actually the routing of
requests within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK and
BYE should be routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and record-route
headers, no longer related to REGISTER (only initial INVITE should rely
on registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>rg>, Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()?
The second one updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for
the couple of local modules immediately, typically needed when having
dialog/presence module in that instance (still no changes to the
header itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact value
should be taken from a special field). The first one uses the lumps
system that makes the changes over the contact URI not visible
immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one
updated by set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with
nat_keepalive(), keepalives are not sent. Removing
set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport
params as a result of add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias()
elsewhere in cfg script with same result.
-dan
*From: *sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Sergiu
Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can
send some sip traffic captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration
works with either. I’m not asking for a solution, just looking
for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com
<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()* instead
of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately
your question is too broad to answer and too little
info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt
someone will present you with a final solution
(there's business support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of
set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the way
to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path
address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already
but something is still not right, and its only
because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need
to do more debugging and see if Im loosing the
flag value. Hoping something sticks out that
someone sees and can point me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com
<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000,
Daniel W. Graham
wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio,
and
since the proxy is the entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I
did have
that working. The main issue is the
routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias
and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get
ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy.
I’m assuming these functions are not being used at
the right locations or I need to rely on another
mechanism to accomplish it. I also question my use
of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my understanding
is that the
Registrar is the PBX, kamailio is
acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the
PBX/registrar have NAT traversal/keepalive
mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W.
Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to be missing something. Any suggestions on
what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and
handle_ruri_alias()
from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has
since broke.
When register keepalive was working,
I was able to place call in either direction but
ACK and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using
add_path()
and is working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to the
PBX, that is
just setting $du and t_relay, and is
also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example,
modified with
above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
>
> request_route {
> ……
> # FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
> setflag(FLT_PBX);
> route(NATDETECT);
> ……
>
> route[NATDETECT] {
> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> force_rport();
> set_contact_alias();
> nat_keepalive();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> route[WITHINDLG] {
> if (!has_totag()) return;
> if (loose_route()) {
> route(DLGURI);
> } else if (
is_method("ACK") ) {
>
route(NATMANAGE);
> } else if (
is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
>
record_route();
> }
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> }
>
> if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri ==
myself) {
> route(PRESENCE);
> exit;
> }
> if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> if ( t_check_trans() ) {
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> } else {
> exit;
> }
> }
> sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
> exit;
> }
>
> route[NATMANAGE] {
> if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> set_contact_alias();
> } return;
> }
>
> route[DLGURI] {
> if(!isdsturiset()) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
>
> onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
> if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
> }
> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
>
> if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
>
>
> -dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
10:51 p.m.
I resolved all of the routing issues. Only issue I’ve got now is nat_keepalive not working
when used with set/add_contact_alias().
-dan
From: "miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:43 PM
To: Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>et>, "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look for fixing it. Now I read
the full thread and actually the routing of requests within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK and BYE should be
routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and record-route headers, no longer related to
REGISTER (only initial INVITE should rely on registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
From: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>, Daniel
Graham <dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()? The second one
updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for the couple of local modules
immediately, typically needed when having dialog/presence module in that instance (still
no changes to the header itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact value
should be taken from a special field). The first one uses the lumps system that makes the
changes over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is
used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one updated by
set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(), keepalives are
not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as a result of
add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere in cfg script
with same result.
-dan
From: sr-users
<sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>
on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas@gmail.com><mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send some sip traffic
captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with either. I’m not
asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try add_path_received() instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too broad
to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's business support, if you're looking for
that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>>
wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
11:03 p.m.
OK, so there were some messages I still missed in the middle of the
discussion...
Can you get all log messages with debug=3 when the keepalive is
attempted to be sent?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03.04.20 21:51, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I resolved all of the routing issues. Only issue I’ve got now is
nat_keepalive not working when used with set/add_contact_alias().
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Date: *Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:43 PM
*To: *Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>et>, "Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look for
fixing it. Now I read the full thread and actually the routing of
requests within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK and
BYE should be routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and record-route
headers, no longer related to REGISTER (only initial INVITE should
rely on registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>, Daniel Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net> <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of
set_contact_alias()? The second one updates the contact URI in a
way that is visible for the couple of local modules immediately,
typically needed when having dialog/presence module in that
instance (still no changes to the header itself, it uses some
internal mechanism to signal contact value should be taken from a
special field). The first one uses the lumps system that makes the
changes over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless
msg_apply_changes() is used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one
updated by set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with
nat_keepalive(), keepalives are not sent. Removing
set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and
rport params as a result of add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias()
elsewhere in cfg script with same result.
-dan
*From: *sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of
Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you
can send some sip traffic captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration
works with either. I’m not asking for a solution, just
looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention,
so I appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()*
instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here,
unfortunately your question is too broad to answer
and too little info, the topology is indeed
non-default and I doubt someone will present you
with a final solution (there's business support,
if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of
set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path
address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times
already but something is still not right, and
its only because of the decoupling of the
registrar. I need to do more debugging and see
if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping something
sticks out that someone sees and can point me
in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com
<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000,
Daniel W.
Graham wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as
kamailio, and
since the proxy is the entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive,
as I did
have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing
set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as
Ive been unable to get ack and bye messages to
make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these
functions are not being used at the right
locations or I need to rely on another
mechanism to accomplish it. I also question my
use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my
understanding is that
the Registrar is the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If
so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W.
Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and
handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module,
without registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has
since
broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either
direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX
using
add_path() and is working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to
the PBX,
that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX
-> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example,
modified
with above changes. I also removed
RTP config as that is a non-issue.
>
> request_route {
> ……
> # FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
> setflag(FLT_PBX);
> route(NATDETECT);
> ……
>
> route[NATDETECT] {
> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> force_rport();
> set_contact_alias();
> nat_keepalive();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> route[WITHINDLG] {
> if (!has_totag()) return;
> if (loose_route()) {
>
route(DLGURI);
> } else if (
is_method("ACK") ) {
>
route(NATMANAGE);
> } else if (
is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
>
record_route();
> }
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> }
>
> if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") &&
uri == myself) {
>> route(PRESENCE);
>> exit;
>> }
>> if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
>> if ( t_check_trans() ) {
>
route(RELAY);
> exit;
> } else {
> exit;
> }
> }
> sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
> exit;
> }
>
> route[NATMANAGE] {
> if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> set_contact_alias();
> } return;
> }
>
> route[DLGURI] {
> if(!isdsturiset()) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
>
> onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
> if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
> }
> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
>
> if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
>
>
> -dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920
(toll-free)
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
4 Apr
4 Apr
4:05 a.m.
Register time is not detected when add_contact_alias() is enabled:
With add_contact_alias() :
Apr 3 20:45:01 host /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28022]: DEBUG: {2 2 REGISTER
103104ZDUxMzk3ZTg4OTM4ZGFhM2M1NmI3ZjBjYTQ3NWM1NWI} nat_traversal [nat_traversal.c:963]:
get_register_expire(): maximum expire for all contacts: 0
Without add_contact_alias():
Apr 3 20:56:52 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28104]: DEBUG: {2 2 REGISTER
103104ZmRiZTI0Y2NkNjUxNDRiYzg5Njc1MzI1NjRkZTM3MTI} nat_traversal [nat_traversal.c:963]:
get_register_expire(): maximum expire for all contacts: 300
-dan
From: "miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM
To: Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>et>, "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
OK, so there were some messages I still missed in the middle of the discussion...
Can you get all log messages with debug=3 when the keepalive is attempted to be sent?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03.04.20 21:51, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I resolved all of the routing issues. Only issue I’ve got now is nat_keepalive not working
when used with set/add_contact_alias().
-dan
From: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:43 PM
To: Daniel Graham <dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>, "Kamailio
(SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look for fixing it. Now I read
the full thread and actually the routing of requests within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK and BYE should be
routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and record-route headers, no longer related to
REGISTER (only initial INVITE should rely on registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
From: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>, Daniel
Graham <dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()? The second one
updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for the couple of local modules
immediately, typically needed when having dialog/presence module in that instance (still
no changes to the header itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact value
should be taken from a special field). The first one uses the lumps system that makes the
changes over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is
used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one updated by
set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(), keepalives are
not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as a result of
add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere in cfg script
with same result.
-dan
From: sr-users
<sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>
on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas@gmail.com><mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send some sip traffic
captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with either. I’m not
asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try add_path_received() instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too broad
to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's business support, if you're looking for
that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>>
wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
11:06 a.m.
Hello,
I looked a bit a the code of the nat_traversal module and it takes the
Expires values from SIP replies, when REGISTER is forwarded (it has to
be with tm t_relay()), but at that moment it compares the contacts with
the headers in request (taken from transaction structure) via string
comparison and in case of mismatch, they are ignored.
So, when you change the contacts during REGISTER request processing,
then you get different values in the replies.
The solution is to not touch the contact at all, but use Path (see path
module) when routing out REGISTERs, then call loose_route() for initial
requests as well.
An alternative is to try to use the keepalive module instead of
nat_traversal, maybe it gives what you need.
And the last one, in master branch I pushed 2 commits (one to core and
one to nat_traversal module) to add an option to match the contact URI
by comparing type, user, host, port and proto. You can try with master
branch by setting contact_match=1 for nat_traversal param and see if works.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04.04.20 03:05, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Register time is not detected when add_contact_alias() is enabled:
With add_contact_alias() :
Apr 3 20:45:01 host /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28022]: DEBUG: {2 2
REGISTER 103104ZDUxMzk3ZTg4OTM4ZGFhM2M1NmI3ZjBjYTQ3NWM1NWI}
nat_traversal [nat_traversal.c:963]: get_register_expire(): maximum
expire for all contacts: 0
Without add_contact_alias():
Apr 3 20:56:52 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28104]: DEBUG: {2 2
REGISTER 103104ZmRiZTI0Y2NkNjUxNDRiYzg5Njc1MzI1NjRkZTM3MTI}
nat_traversal [nat_traversal.c:963]: get_register_expire(): maximum
expire for all contacts: 300
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Date: *Friday, April 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM
*To: *Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>et>, "Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
OK, so there were some messages I still missed in the middle of the
discussion...
Can you get all log messages with debug=3 when the keepalive is
attempted to be sent?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03.04.20 21:51, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I resolved all of the routing issues. Only issue I’ve got now is
nat_keepalive not working when used with set/add_contact_alias().
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Date: *Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:43 PM
*To: *Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>,
"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look
for fixing it. Now I read the full thread and actually the routing
of requests within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK
and BYE should be routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and
record-route headers, no longer related to REGISTER (only initial
INVITE should rely on registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>, Daniel Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net> <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of
set_contact_alias()? The second one updates the contact URI in
a way that is visible for the couple of local modules
immediately, typically needed when having dialog/presence
module in that instance (still no changes to the header
itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact
value should be taken from a special field). The first one
uses the lumps system that makes the changes over the contact
URI not visible immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the
one updated by set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially
lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with
nat_keepalive(), keepalives are not sent. Removing
set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and
rport params as a result of add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to
handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere in cfg script with same result.
-dan
*From: *sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of
Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be
you can send some sip traffic captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net <mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but
registration works with either. I’m not asking for a
solution, just looking for suggestions on anything
that needs attention, so I appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()*
instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com <mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here,
unfortunately your question is too broad to
answer and too little info, the topology is
indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's
business support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of
set_contact_alias) just for Register method on
the way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's
Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W.
Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times
already but something is still not right,
and its only because of the decoupling of
the registrar. I need to do more debugging
and see if Im loosing the flag value.
Hoping something sticks out that someone
sees and can point me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com
<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
_______________________________________________
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM
+0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as
kamailio,
and since the proxy is the entry
point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the
keepalive, as I
did have that working. The
main issue is the routing of messages,
utilizing set_contact_alias and
handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to
get ack and bye messages to make it past
the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations
or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of
the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu
Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com
<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my
understanding is
that the Registrar is the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy.
If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel
W. Graham
<dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while
and seem to be missing something. Any
suggestions on what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and
handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module
and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal
module, without registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that
has since
broke. When register keepalive
was working, I was able to place call in
either direction but ACK and BYE was not
being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX
using
add_path() and is working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing
to the PBX,
that is just setting $du and
t_relay, and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio ->
PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the
example, modified
with above changes. I
also removed RTP config as that is a
non-issue.
>
> request_route {
> ……
> # FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
> setflag(FLT_PBX);
> route(NATDETECT);
> ……
>
> route[NATDETECT] {
> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> force_rport();
> set_contact_alias();
> nat_keepalive();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> route[WITHINDLG] {
> if (!has_totag()) return;
> if (loose_route()) {
>
route(DLGURI);
> } else if (
is_method("ACK") ) {
>
route(NATMANAGE);
> } else if (
is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
>
record_route();
> }
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> }
>
> if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE")
&& uri == myself) {
> route(PRESENCE);
> exit;
> }
> if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
> if (
t_check_trans() ) {
>
route(RELAY);
> exit;
> } else {
> exit;
> }
> }
> sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
> exit;
> }
>
> route[NATMANAGE] {
> if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
> set_contact_alias();
> } return;
> }
>
> route[DLGURI] {
> if(!isdsturiset()) {
> handle_ruri_alias();
> }
> return;
> }
>
> branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
>
> onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
> if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
> route(NATMANAGE);
> }
> }
> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
> route(NATMANAGE);
>
> if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
>
>
> -dan
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste
Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920
(toll-free)
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
7:35 p.m.
I pulled master branch and tested with contact_match=1 and it resolved the issue. I am
using path with loose_route as well, but seems to be an issue with the endpoint not
honoring path. I’m going to do further testing later today to make sure it doesn't
have negative impact on invite keepalives, but looks good so far.
Thanks for your commits, they are much appreciated! Thanks to all others that offered
input as well!
On Apr 4, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I looked a bit a the code of the nat_traversal module and it takes the Expires values from
SIP replies, when REGISTER is forwarded (it has to be with tm t_relay()), but at that
moment it compares the contacts with the headers in request (taken from transaction
structure) via string comparison and in case of mismatch, they are ignored.
So, when you change the contacts during REGISTER request processing, then you get
different values in the replies.
The solution is to not touch the contact at all, but use Path (see path module) when
routing out REGISTERs, then call loose_route() for initial requests as well.
An alternative is to try to use the keepalive module instead of nat_traversal, maybe it
gives what you need.
And the last one, in master branch I pushed 2 commits (one to core and one to
nat_traversal module) to add an option to match the contact URI by comparing type, user,
host, port and proto. You can try with master branch by setting contact_match=1 for
nat_traversal param and see if works.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04.04.20 03:05, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Register time is not detected when add_contact_alias() is enabled:
With add_contact_alias() :
Apr 3 20:45:01 host /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28022]: DEBUG: {2 2 REGISTER
103104ZDUxMzk3ZTg4OTM4ZGFhM2M1NmI3ZjBjYTQ3NWM1NWI} nat_traversal [nat_traversal.c:963]:
get_register_expire(): maximum expire for all contacts: 0
Without add_contact_alias():
Apr 3 20:56:52 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28104]: DEBUG: {2 2 REGISTER
103104ZmRiZTI0Y2NkNjUxNDRiYzg5Njc1MzI1NjRkZTM3MTI} nat_traversal [nat_traversal.c:963]:
get_register_expire(): maximum expire for all contacts: 300
-dan
From: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM
To: Daniel Graham <dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>, "Kamailio
(SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
OK, so there were some messages I still missed in the middle of the discussion...
Can you get all log messages with debug=3 when the keepalive is attempted to be sent?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03.04.20 21:51, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I resolved all of the routing issues. Only issue I’ve got now is nat_keepalive not working
when used with set/add_contact_alias().
-dan
From: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:43 PM
To: Daniel Graham <dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>, "Kamailio
(SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look for fixing it. Now I read
the full thread and actually the routing of requests within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK and BYE should be
routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and record-route headers, no longer related to
REGISTER (only initial INVITE should rely on registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
From: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "miconda@gmail.com"<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
<miconda@gmail.com><mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>, Daniel
Graham <dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()? The second one
updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for the couple of local modules
immediately, typically needed when having dialog/presence module in that instance (still
no changes to the header itself, it uses some internal mechanism to signal contact value
should be taken from a special field). The first one uses the lumps system that makes the
changes over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is
used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one updated by
set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(), keepalives are
not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as a result of
add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere in cfg script
with same result.
-dan
From: sr-users
<sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>
on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas@gmail.com><mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send some sip traffic
captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with either. I’m not
asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on anything that needs attention, so I
appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try add_path_received() instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is too broad
to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default and I doubt someone will
present you with a final solution (there's business support, if you're looking for
that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for Register method on the
way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not right, and its
only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to do more debugging and see if Im
loosing the flag value. Hoping something sticks out that someone sees and can point me in
the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel
W. Graham wrote:
It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is the entry
point.
The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working. The main issue is
the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been
unable to get ack and bye messages to make it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions
are not being used at the right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to
accomplish it. I also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas@gmail.com<mailto:pojogas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is the PBX, kamailio
is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the PBX/registrar have NAT
traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham
<dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net><mailto:dan@cmsinter.net<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>>>
wrote:
I’ve been missing with this for a while and seem to be missing something. Any suggestions
on what is missing here?
Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from nathelper module and
nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without registrar.
I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register keepalive was
working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK and BYE was not being routed
past kamailio.
Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting $du and t_relay,
and is also working.
Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes. I also removed RTP
config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
18 May
18 May
3:03 a.m.
Hello again,
In continuation of this topic, just today I decide to try
out nat_keepalive(), it sounded like a nice-to-have feature for my edge
proxies.
I can also confirm that when using contact_match=1 && set_contact_alias()
the keepalives are being sent out correctly. However, not so much when
using fix_nated_contact(). Rightfully so one may argue why use it in 1st
place, however in some cases rewriting the Contact's addresses is necessary.
If it's not too much trouble, can the contact_match modparam be adjusted to
account for this scenario as well?
Thanks.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:39 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
I pulled master branch and tested with contact_match=1
and it resolved the
issue. I am using path with loose_route as well, but seems to be an issue
with the endpoint not honoring path. I’m going to do further testing later
today to make sure it doesn't have negative impact on invite keepalives,
but looks good so far.
Thanks for your commits, they are much appreciated! Thanks to all others
that offered input as well!
On Apr 4, 2020, at 4:06 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
I looked a bit a the code of the nat_traversal module and it takes the
Expires values from SIP replies, when REGISTER is forwarded (it has to be
with tm t_relay()), but at that moment it compares the contacts with the
headers in request (taken from transaction structure) via string comparison
and in case of mismatch, they are ignored.
So, when you change the contacts during REGISTER request processing, then
you get different values in the replies.
The solution is to not touch the contact at all, but use Path (see path
module) when routing out REGISTERs, then call loose_route() for initial
requests as well.
An alternative is to try to use the keepalive module instead of
nat_traversal, maybe it gives what you need.
And the last one, in master branch I pushed 2 commits (one to core and one
to nat_traversal module) to add an option to match the contact URI by
comparing type, user, host, port and proto. You can try with master branch
by setting contact_match=1 for nat_traversal param and see if works.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04.04.20 03:05, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Register time is not detected when add_contact_alias() is enabled:
With add_contact_alias() :
Apr 3 20:45:01 host /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28022]: DEBUG: {2 2 REGISTER
103104ZDUxMzk3ZTg4OTM4ZGFhM2M1NmI3ZjBjYTQ3NWM1NWI} nat_traversal
[nat_traversal.c:963]: get_register_expire(): maximum expire for all
contacts: 0
Without add_contact_alias():
Apr 3 20:56:52 edgedev /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28104]: DEBUG: {2 2
REGISTER 103104ZmRiZTI0Y2NkNjUxNDRiYzg5Njc1MzI1NjRkZTM3MTI} nat_traversal
[nat_traversal.c:963]: get_register_expire(): maximum expire for all
contacts: 300
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Date: *Friday, April 3, 2020 at 4:03 PM
*To: *Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> <dan(a)cmsinter.net>et>, "Kamailio
(SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
OK, so there were some messages I still missed in the middle of the
discussion...
Can you get all log messages with debug=3 when the keepalive is attempted
to be sent?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03.04.20 21:51, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I resolved all of the routing issues. Only issue I’ve got now is
nat_keepalive not working when used with set/add_contact_alias().
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Date: *Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:43 PM
*To: *Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> <dan(a)cmsinter.net>et>, "Kamailio
(SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Somehow I thought that the keepalive is not working and you look for
fixing it. Now I read the full thread and actually the routing of requests
within dialog doesn't work.
Can you send a pcap with such a call taken on Kamailio system? ACK and BYE
should be routed based on Contact of INVITE/200ok and record-route headers,
no longer related to REGISTER (only initial INVITE should rely on
registration data).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 22:11, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
Same behavior with add_contact_alias()
-dan
*From: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"miconda(a)gmail.com" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
*Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:59 PM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>rg>, Daniel Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>
<dan(a)cmsinter.net>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Hello,
can you try with add_contact_alias() instead of set_contact_alias()? The
second one updates the contact URI in a way that is visible for the couple
of local modules immediately, typically needed when having dialog/presence
module in that instance (still no changes to the header itself, it uses
some internal mechanism to signal contact value should be taken from a
special field). The first one uses the lumps system that makes the changes
over the contact URI not visible immediately (unless msg_apply_changes() is
used).
Maybe nat_keepalive() needs the original contact URI, not the one updated
by set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02.04.20 18:45, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
I was able to fix all issues, but have one partially lingering.
For register only, if I apply: set_contact_alias() with nat_keepalive(),
keepalives are not sent. Removing set_contact_alias() fixes this.
I *shouldn’t need this if the pbx was saving received and rport params as
a result of add_path_received().
Can anyone explain why these two functions conflict?
Test scenario -
# Doesn’t result in register keepalive –
route[NATDETECT] {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias(); # removal of this enables keepalive
nat_keepalive();
return;
}
I’ve tested this with and without calls to handle_ruri_alias() elsewhere
in cfg script with same result.
-dan
*From: *sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga
<pojogas(a)gmail.com> <pojogas(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM
*To: *"Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] nathelper without usrloc
Nothing else comes to mind based on info provided. May be you can send
some sip traffic captures and elaborate?
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:29 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net>
wrote:
Thanks, yeah I had already changed that, but registration works with
either. I’m not asking for a solution, just looking for suggestions on
anything that needs attention, so I appreciate your pointers.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:55 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh and almost forgot - try *add_path_received()* instead of add_path()
Good luck!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:48 PM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A lot of things may not be 'right' here, unfortunately your question is
too broad to answer and too little info, the topology is indeed non-default
and I doubt someone will present you with a final solution (there's
business support, if you're looking for that).
Otherwise, if I were to just throw a guess:
- try fix_nated_register() (instead of set_contact_alias) just for
Register method on the way to the registrar
- in the Registrar, make sure the Contact's Path address is correct
Cheers,
--Sergiu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net> wrote:
It did help, I read that a couple times already but something is still not
right, and its only because of the decoupling of the registrar. I need to
do more debugging and see if Im loosing the flag value. Hoping something
sticks out that someone sees and can point me in the right direction.
-dan
On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:15 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Daniel,
Might this article be of aid?
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the…
-- Alex
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:12:23PM +0000, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
>
> It does but doesn't work as well as kamailio, and since the proxy is
the
entry point.
>
> The biggest issue here isnt the keepalive, as I did have that working.
The
main issue is the routing of messages, utilizing set_contact_alias and
handle_ruri_alias, as Ive been unable to get ack and bye messages to make
it past the proxy. I’m assuming these functions are not being used at the
right locations or I need to rely on another mechanism to accomplish it. I
also question my use of the PBX flag and the natmanage logic.
>
> -dan
>
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:01 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> From what you are describing, my understanding is that the Registrar is
the
PBX, kamailio is acting as an edge proxy. If so, doesn't the
PBX/registrar have NAT traversal/keepalive mechanisms of its own?
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:55 PM Daniel W. Graham <dan(a)cmsinter.net
<mailto:dan@cmsinter.net>> wrote:
> I’ve been missing with this for a while and
seem to be missing
something. Any suggestions on what is missing here?
>
> Trying to use set_contact_alias() and handle_ruri_alias() from
nathelper
module and nat_keepalive from nat_traversal module, without
registrar.
>
> I had register keepalive working, that has since broke. When register
keepalive was working, I was able to place call in either direction but ACK
and BYE was not being routed past kamailio.
>
> Registrations are forwarded to the PBX using add_path() and is working.
>
> Also not included below is the routing to the PBX, that is just setting
$du
and t_relay, and is also working.
>
> Topology is: UA1 -> NAT -> kamailio -> PBX -> UA2
>
> Using default config file as the example, modified with above changes.
I also
removed RTP config as that is a non-issue.
request_route {
……
# FLAG MESSAGES FROM PBX
setflag(FLT_PBX);
route(NATDETECT);
……
route[NATDETECT] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
force_rport();
set_contact_alias();
nat_keepalive();
}
return;
}
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (!has_totag()) return;
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
} else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
route(NATMANAGE);
} else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) {
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
exit;
}
route[NATMANAGE] {
if(isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
if(!isflagset(FLT_PBX)) {
set_contact_alias();
} return;
}
route[DLGURI] {
if(!isdsturiset()) {
handle_ruri_alias();
}
return;
}
branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
}
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] {
route(NATMANAGE);
if (t_is_canceled()) exit;
-dan
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
1651
days inactive
1699
days old
19 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alex Balashov -
Daniel W. Graham -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Sergiu Pojoga