New subject: $ua in on_reply route not set?

24 Jan 2011

Hi,

found the problem. The device does sometimes use User-Agent and sometimes Server. 

Is it better to use $hdr() or the Search() function?

I use this to check for the User-Agent and then to do a "fix_nated_sdp()" (in
route[] and onreply[]) because I am not really sure, if the fix_nated_sdp() could break
something. Or should kamailio break nothing here? Sometimes the User-Agent/Server is
missing in Session-Progress 183. Therefore a "global" fix_nated_sdp() would be
nice to have.

Best regards,
Bernhard

----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.suttner@winet.ch]
Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:09:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] $ua in on_reply route not set?

...
  Hello,

 On 1/24/11 5:03 PM, Bernhard Suttner wrote:
  Hi,

 could it be, that the $ua pseudo variable is not set within in a onreply  route?
(Version 3.1).
 no, should be set, there was no change in this regard for quite long 
 time. Can you sent the sip reply plus log with debug=3?

 What is the best alternative for that? Search()?  
 The alternative is $hdr(User-Agent) which is practically returning the 
 same value as $ua, using generic header search mechanism.

 Cheers,
 Daniel

 -- 
 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
 http://www.asipto.com