2 Sep
2006
2 Sep
'06
1:21 a.m.
I've got a dumb question.
Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot)
without getting the Via and potentially Record-Route tags in
the header???
I warned you it was dumb....
-g
--
Greg Fausak
greg(a)thursday.com
4 Sep
4 Sep
1:09 p.m.
Hello,
On 09/02/06 01:21, Greg Fausak wrote:
I've got a dumb question.
Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot)
without getting the Via
Via is mandatory. Otherwise the reply will not come back on the same way.
and potentially Record-Route tags in
the header???
Do not use record_route()
Cheers,
Daniel
I warned you it was dumb....
-g
5:59 p.m.
Hi Greg,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 09/02/06 01:21, Greg Fausak wrote:
there is an undocumented function which can be used to send a request
statelessly to another server without having VIA added:
send(address);
regards,
bogdan
I've got a dumb question.
Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot)
without getting the Via
Via is mandatory. Otherwise the reply will not come back on the same way.
and potentially Record-Route tags in
the header???
Do not use record_route()
Cheers,
Daniel
I warned you it was dumb....
-g
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6 Sep
6 Sep
12:57 a.m.
Howdy,
Will the send() function still resolve the RURI destination?
That is, if the destination is 123(a)test.com, and test.com has a srv
record, will send() forward the packet to the srv address?
Know what I mean?
-g
On 9/4/06, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Greg,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
--
Greg Fausak
greg(a)thursday.com
Hello,
On 09/02/06 01:21, Greg Fausak wrote:
there is an undocumented function which can be used to send a request
statelessly to another server without having VIA added:
send(address);
regards,
bogdan
I've got a dumb question.
Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot)
without getting the Via
Via is mandatory. Otherwise the reply will not come back on the same way.
and potentially Record-Route tags in
the header???
Do not use record_route()
Cheers,
Daniel
I warned you it was dumb....
-g
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
9:56 a.m.
Hi Greg,
the send function take as script parameter the destination address, so
the RURI will not be used.
regards,
bogdan
Greg Fausak wrote:
Howdy,
Will the send() function still resolve the RURI destination?
That is, if the destination is 123(a)test.com, and test.com has a srv
record, will send() forward the packet to the srv address?
Know what I mean?
-g
On 9/4/06, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hi Greg,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 09/02/06 01:21, Greg Fausak wrote:
there is an undocumented function which can be used to send a request
statelessly to another server without having VIA added:
send(address);
regards,
bogdan
I've got a dumb question.
Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot)
without getting the Via
Via is mandatory. Otherwise the reply will not come back on the
same way.
and potentially Record-Route tags in
the header???
Do not use record_route()
Cheers,
Daniel
I warned you it was dumb....
-g
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6652
days inactive
6657
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Greg Fausak