Hey All,
I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a progressive memory leak.
So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
Thanks, Darren Nay
Darren,
If you're using SER with paying customers (or at least important customers) then I'd recommend using the SER-0.9.x stable branch.
The primary reason is that the CVS HEAD is unstable and likely has undiscovered bugs.
Regards, Paul
On 9/26/05, Darren Nay dnay@ionosphere.net wrote:
Hey All,
I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a progressive memory leak.
So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
Thanks, Darren Nay
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Sorry, I didn't explain well enough.
I am using the SER 0.9.x stable branch. " cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" but it's version 0.9.5-pre1 .. However, on the website there is version 0.9.4 in a tarball for download.
Is 0.9.5-pre1 stable, or should I use the 0.9.4 downloadable tarball?
Darren
On 9/26/05 10:37 AM, "Paul Hazlett" javarockx@gmail.com wrote:
Darren,
If you're using SER with paying customers (or at least important customers) then I'd recommend using the SER-0.9.x stable branch.
The primary reason is that the CVS HEAD is unstable and likely has undiscovered bugs.
Regards, Paul
On 9/26/05, Darren Nay dnay@ionosphere.net wrote:
Hey All,
I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a progressive memory leak.
So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
Thanks, Darren Nay
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
You should use 0.9.4 from the tarball. 0.9.5-pre1 will be released as 0.9.5 once we fix some remaining bugs.
Jan.
On 26-09-2005 11:04, Darren Nay wrote:
Sorry, I didn't explain well enough.
I am using the SER 0.9.x stable branch. " cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" but it's version 0.9.5-pre1 .. However, on the website there is version 0.9.4 in a tarball for download.
Is 0.9.5-pre1 stable, or should I use the 0.9.4 downloadable tarball?
Darren
On 9/26/05 10:37 AM, "Paul Hazlett" javarockx@gmail.com wrote:
Darren,
If you're using SER with paying customers (or at least important customers) then I'd recommend using the SER-0.9.x stable branch.
The primary reason is that the CVS HEAD is unstable and likely has undiscovered bugs.
Regards, Paul
On 9/26/05, Darren Nay dnay@ionosphere.net wrote:
Hey All,
I installed SER 0.9.3 about 3 weeks ago and since then have been getting core dumps about every 7-8 days consistently. Acts almost like a progressive memory leak.
So .. I've noticed that release 0.9.4 has also been released about 2 weeks ago with a few bug fixes (including a memory leak or two). However, the CVS head is also available with 0.9.5-pre1.
So .. What I really need to know is.. Which version should I use? :)
Thanks, Darren Nay
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Darren Nay -
Jan Janak -
Paul Hazlett