5 Apr
2005
5 Apr
'05
8:26 a.m.
Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm worried about is of
course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
have happened several times..
Thanks..
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu' I
only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest having no cpu time at
all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
9 Apr
9 Apr
4:26 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Child procs
The children are not all equal. Some of them serve requests coming from
UDP, some of them from TCP and some are auxiliary, like the timer
process or the fifo server.
You can see the purpose of each children using serctl ps command.
If most of the traffic being processed by your server comes over UDP
then only the UDP receivers will be running and the TCP receivers will
be idle, but you still need them to be able to receive TCP based
traffic.
Optimum number of processes depends on your hardware and the amount of
traffic being processed. For common setups 8 children should be OK.
Jan.
On 05-04 07:26, Matt Schulte wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm
worried about is of
course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
have happened several times..
Thanks..
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu' I
only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest having no cpu time at
all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7174
days inactive
7178
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jan Janak -
Matt Schulte