29 Apr
2005
29 Apr
'05
6:21 p.m.
Hi All.
I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as follows:
eth0: 10.3.0.221 <http://10.3.0.221>
eth1: 10.2.0.42 <http://10.2.0.42>
If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send any
replies out eth1?
Regards,
Paul
29 Apr
29 Apr
6:49 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network Interface?
Supported in >=0.9.0:
force_send_socket([proto:]address[:port])
sends the message from the specified socket (it _must_ be one of the
sockets ser listens on). If the protocol doesn't match (e.g. udp
message "forced" to a tcp socket) the closest socket of the same
protocol is used.
---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:21 PM
Subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?
Hi All.
I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as
follows:
eth0: 10.3.0.221
eth1: 10.2.0.42
If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send
any replies out eth1?
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:52 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network Interface?
Thanks Greger.
One more question - how would I use force_send_socket()?
Do I replace t_relay() or is this just to be called at the top of the main
route block or something?
Regards,
Paul
On 4/29/05, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote:
Supported in >=0.9.0:
force_send_socket([proto:]address[:port])
sends the message from the specified socket (it _must_ be one of the
sockets ser listens on). If the protocol doesn't match (e.g. udp
message "forced" to a tcp socket) the closest socket of the same
protocol is used.
---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:21 PM
Subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?
Hi All.
I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as
follows:
eth0: 10.3.0.221 <http://10.3.0.221>
eth1: 10.2.0.42 <http://10.2.0.42>
If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send
any replies out eth1?
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7:10 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network Interface?
Hi Paul,
It sets a flag in routing for which socket to use. I am not aware of any restructions on
functions you may call after that.
g-)
---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: Greger V. Teigre
Cc: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?
Thanks Greger.
One more question - how would I use force_send_socket()?
Do I replace t_relay() or is this just to be called at the top of the
main route block or something?
Regards,
Paul
On 4/29/05, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote:
Supported in >=0.9.0:
force_send_socket([proto:]address[:port])
sends the message from the specified socket (it _must_ be one
of the
sockets ser listens on). If the protocol doesn't match (e.g.
udp
message "forced" to a tcp socket) the closest socket of the
same
protocol is used.
---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:21 PM
Subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?
Hi All.
I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as
follows:
eth0: 10.3.0.221
eth1: 10.2.0.42
If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send
any replies out eth1?
Regards,
Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7147
days inactive
7147
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Java Rockx