I'm not so sure that we'll be running the rtp proxy piece. I'm thinking
it'll all be public addresses and the endpoints we have already do nat
transversal.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
Cc: Darren Sessions; 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org '
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Scalability Question
Some time ago at a request from one of prospective clients we had
performed peak performance estimate for our rtpproxy. According to
results, it should be able to handle up to 2,000 simulateneous G.723.1
sessions on a decent machine (P4 2.5-3.0 GHz). Please note that
fine-tuning of OS network stack parameters can be necessary to get such
high numbers, since RTP traffic consists of big number of very short UDP
frames (up to 30 frames/sec for one session), so that network stack
should be prepared to handle huge number of short packets.
-Maxim
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Dec 10, 2003 at 06:56, Darren Sessions
<dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
wrote:
>Here is a little more insight into what I envision to be the core network.
>Hopefully this will help in the scalability question I'm desperate to get
a
>better understanding of.
>
>I'm just not sure if I've under-engineered this, or over-engineered it -
and
what I can get
rid of to save money or what more I need to spend.
I don't know about sems, but ser, if tuned for performance can do
4500-4800 cps on a dual athlon mp 2000+. On your configuration (dual
Xeon 3Ghz 1Mb cache) it should do much better (but I think it is very
improbable to have 10000 calls in a second from 100000 users, at least
not sustained more then a few seconds). You might consider adding more
memory (4Gb so you can use 3-3.5Gb for ser). This only if you want to
be prepared for the worse (DOS attacks that try to initiate as many
calls possible to non-responding destination, creating a lot of
transaction that will be deleted only after the final response timer
hits (default 120s); ser uses about 5k/transaction ).
Andrei
>Thanks again for all the help!
>
> - Darren
>
>
>
>---
>
>
>Architecture = Intel i386
>
>Bandwidth = DS3 to OC12
>
>Population Size = Initially, a 100k user base at 10-1 ratio (10,000
>simultaneous calls) and a 100-1 ratio for voicemail (1,000 simultaneous
>calls).
>
>Scenario Implemented:
>
>2x centralized database servers (For SER/SEMS) Running Redhat Advanced
>Server 2.1 - Quad 2.5Ghz 1MB Cache Xeon CPUs - 8GB Ram - 60GB Raid Storage
>on host - Multi-Threaded MySQL - Multiple Gigabit Network Interfaces
>
>2x centralized storage servers (For VM, Web Content, etc) Running Redhat
>Advanced Server 2.1 - 2GB Ram - 140GB Storage on Host - 2.04TB Raid
Storage
>- Multiple Gigabit Network Interfaces
>
>4x SER servers Running RedHat AS 2.1 or RedHat 9 - Dual 3Ghz Xeon CPUs per
>server - 2GB RAM - NFS to Storage Server via Deticated Gigabit Network -
>Seperate Network card for Internet Connectivity - 18GB Raid Storage on
Host
>
>4x SEMS servers Running RedHat AS 2.1 or RedHat 9 - Dual 3Ghz Xeon CPUs
per
>server - 2GB RAM - NFS to Storage Server via
Deticated Gigabit Network -
>Seperate Network card for Internet Connectivity - 18GB Raid Storage on
Host
6x WEB Servers
3x DNS Servers
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Sent: 12/10/2003 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Scalability Question
No, it depends on many factors like, architecture used, bandwitdth,
population size, scenario implemented and so on.
Jan.
On 09-12 12:35, Darren Sessions wrote:
Is there a scalability guide anywhere I can use in
helping me decide
how
much hardware to buy for SER + SER/SEMS
application?
Thanks,
- Darren
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers