Sending to the list as more people might be interested...
I read offer/answer RFC quite a long ago but as far as I remember
there is no limit in the parameters you can change in a new
offer/answer exchange.
According to this, UA1 can change the port and the media direccion in
the same offer/answer exchange.
Samuel.
2005/12/15, tcchan <tikchoong.chan(a)redtone.com>om>:
Dear Samuel,
Thanks you very much for your answer.
I would like to consult you the following:
normal call,
UA1 ----- invite --port 30000-------> UA2
UA2 <---------OK port 20000 ---------UA2
UA1 hold the call,
UA1 -----invite --port 30000(hold) ----> UA2
UA1 <--------OK port 20000 -------------UA2
UA1 unhold the call,
UA1 ------invite -----port 30001 -------> UA2
UA1 <----------OK port 20000 -----------UA2
Noticed that when UA1 unhold the call, it uses a different port.
Is UA1 SIP compliant.
Thanks again and Regards,
TC Chan
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 09:18 +0100, samuel wrote:
UA is not SIP compliant. It must include the SDP
in the OK.
Samuel.
2005/12/14, tcchan <tikchoong.chan(a)redtone.com>om>:
Dear All,
I encountered a UA that behave as follow:
UA1 call UA2
UA1 ---- invite with SDP -----> UA2
UA1 <------OK with SDP --------UA2
UA1 hold the call,
UA1 ------invite (hold) ------>UA2
UA1 <--------OK but not SDP ---UA2
UA1 unhold the call
UA1 ------invite ----------->UA2
UA1 <-------OK but also no SDP---UA2
I found that most ATA(UA) would attached a SDP when reply an OK whether
the call is hold or unhold. But there is one ATA that does not (UA2).
I noticed that some ATA--Linksys (UA1) would send a BYE to UA2 if it
receive a OK with no SDP in the hold case.
My Question is :
Is UA2 behave according to RFC?
Would deeply appreciate if someone could let me know the answer as I
always have trouble reading RFCs...
Thanks fot any help available.
Regards,
TC Chan
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers