Hello. There was an interesting discussion about the same issue. Check by Subject : [Serusers] STUN server on April 4. (you can check the mailing list)

Regards, Ricardo.-

-----Mensaje original----- De: info@beeplove.com [mailto:info@beeplove.com] Enviado el: Jueves, 05 de Mayo de 2005 10:41 Para: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Nat+SER

I have a simple question, if i am using stun server if there any need to use mediaproxy or rtpproxy, for users sitting behind routers ?? and if yes which one is the better choise to do that (mediaproxy or rtpproxy)?

Thanks for help.

Stun server takes care of your clients who are behind Assymetric NAT. It also depends on client. Like, your cleints may not be forced to use STUN server. Also, if your client use STUN, you need to use [Media/RTP]Proxy to cover users who are from Symetric NAT.

...

From my personal experience, I found MediaProxy easy to

configure and have some very good features. It doesn't mean RTPProxy is not good. I just couldn't make RTPProxy worked. Maybe I was not that familiar with RTPProxy/SER when I tried it. Well, after MediaProxy worked, I didn't try RTPProxy again.

MOhammad

---

mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers