7 Sep
2021
7 Sep
'21
8:09 a.m.
during testing I need to remove a Via header
This is the code snippet
route[REPLACE_VIA] {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n");
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
if(remove_hf("Via")) {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n");
}
else {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] did not remove
Via\n");
}
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
and this is the logs output
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_RURI] Start of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers
From the logs it looks like the remove_hf returns true and we have the
header removed, but its still counting the Via header and the Via Header
is still present when the INVIE is releyed on
Regards,
Richard
7 Sep
7 Sep
9:05 a.m.
Hello,
please have a look here
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers…
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Richard Robson
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:10 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: [SR-Users] via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
during testing I need to remove a Via header
This is the code snippet
route[REPLACE_VIA] {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n");
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
if(remove_hf("Via")) {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n");
}
else {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] did not remove
Via\n");
}
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
and this is the logs output
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_RURI] Start
of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] Start
of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via
headers
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA]
removed Via
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via
headers
From the logs it looks like the remove_hf returns true and we have the header removed, but
its still counting the Via header and the Via Header is still present when the INVIE is
releyed on
Regards,
Richard
9:12 a.m.
hi ,
Thanks Hennig,
I added the counts to check and i'll retest with the ms_+appl_changes() too.
The real problem is that the Via is getting into the relayed INVITE. I
had assumed that it would not get relayed if it were removed.
Regards,
Richard
On 07/09/2021 14:05, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
please have a look here
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers…
<http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers_or>
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ <https://skalatan.de/blog/>
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com <https://gilawa.com/>
*From:*sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of
*Richard Robson
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:10 PM
*To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* [SR-Users] via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
during testing I need to remove a Via header
This is the code snippet
route[REPLACE_VIA] {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n");
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
if(remove_hf("Via")) {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n");
}
else {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] did not remove Via\n");
}
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
and this is the logs output
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_RURI] Start of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad:
[REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers
From the logs it looks like the remove_hf returns true and we have the
header removed, but its still counting the Via header and the Via
Header is still present when the INVIE is releyed on
Regards,
Richard
9:25 a.m.
Hello,
Just a note - maybe you are having some special requirements, but usually you do not need
to manipulate the Via header in Kamailio.
If you are relaying the request, why do you do not want to have a Via added to the
message? It’s a requirement by RFC 3261 for a stateful proxy.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: Richard Robson <richard(a)rikrobson.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 3:13 PM
To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de>de>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
hi ,
Thanks Hennig,
I added the counts to check and i'll retest with the ms_+appl_changes() too.
The real problem is that the Via is getting into the relayed INVITE. I had assumed that it
would not get relayed if it were removed.
Regards,
Richard
On 07/09/2021 14:05, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
please have a look here
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers…
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: sr-users
<sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>
On Behalf Of Richard Robson
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:10 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<sr-users@lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: [SR-Users] via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
during testing I need to remove a Via header
This is the code snippet
route[REPLACE_VIA] {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n");
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
if(remove_hf("Via")) {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n");
}
else {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] did not remove
Via\n");
}
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
and this is the logs output
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_RURI] Start
of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] Start
of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via
headers
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA]
removed Via
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via
headers
From the logs it looks like the remove_hf returns true and we have the header removed, but
its still counting the Via header and the Via Header is still present when the INVIE is
releyed on
Regards,
Richard
9:50 a.m.
its a bit of a hack, but the bottom line is the Via has a private IP
address in it which the carrier we are using does not like and is
rejection the call. so i want to remove it to prove a point.
its getting relayed from a kamailio that has topology hiding to a
carrier by this intermediate box and this intermediate bos has some
manual TH. Its not my design and i'm just trying to fix it.
R
On 07/09/2021 14:25, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
Just a note - maybe you are having some special requirements, but
usually you do not need to manipulate the Via header in Kamailio.
If you are relaying the request, why do you do not want to have a Via
added to the message? It’s a requirement by RFC 3261 for a stateful proxy.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ <https://skalatan.de/blog/>
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com <https://gilawa.com/>
*From:* Richard Robson <richard(a)rikrobson.co.uk>
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 7, 2021 3:13 PM
*To:* Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de>de>; Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
hi ,
Thanks Hennig,
I added the counts to check and i'll retest with the
ms_+appl_changes() too.
The real problem is that the Via is getting into the relayed INVITE. I
had assumed that it would not get relayed if it were removed.
Regards,
Richard
On 07/09/2021 14:05, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
please have a look here
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers…
<http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers_or>
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
<https://skalatan.de/blog/>
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com <https://gilawa.com/>
*From:*sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org>
<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of
*Richard Robson
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:10 PM
*To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* [SR-Users] via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
during testing I need to remove a Via header
This is the code snippet
route[REPLACE_VIA] {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n");
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
if(remove_hf("Via")) {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n");
}
else {
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] did not remove Via\n");
}
xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n");
and this is the logs output
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG:
3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_RURI] Start of
block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG:
3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] Start of block
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG:
3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG:
3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] removed Via
Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG:
3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers
From the logs it looks like the remove_hf returns true and we have
the header removed, but its still counting the Via header and the
Via Header is still present when the INVIE is releyed on
Regards,
Richard
1211
days inactive
1211
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Henning Westerholt -
Richard Robson