Hi,
The following sentence in section 1.4.8. t_flush_flags() of tm module documentation(version 1.2.X) has several spelling mistakes.
Incorrect Flush the flags from current request into the already created transaction. It make sens only in routing block if the trnasaction was created via t_newtran() and the flags have been altered since.
Correct Flush the flags from current request into the already created transaction. It make sense only in routing block if the transaction was created via t_newtran() and the flags have been altered since.
Thanks, Ruchir
Few more corrections in same page:
1.1.3. DNS Failover
Incorrect: A failure occures if the coresponding interface was found for sending the request, if the TCP connection was refused ot if a geenric internal error happend during send. There is no ICMP error report support. Correct: A failure occurs if the corresponding interface was found for sending the request, if the TCP connection was refused or if a generic internal error happened during send. There is no ICMP error report support.
Thanks, Ruchir
-----Original Message----- From: Ruchir Brahmbhatt ruchir.brahmbhatt@ecosmob.com Reply-To: ruchir.brahmbhatt@ecosmob.com To: Openser users mailing list users@lists.openser.org Subject: Correction in documentation of tm module(version 1.2.X) Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 00:41:56 +0530
Hi,
The following sentence in section 1.4.8. t_flush_flags() of tm module documentation(version 1.2.X) has several spelling mistakes.
Incorrect Flush the flags from current request into the already created transaction. It make sens only in routing block if the trnasaction was created via t_newtran() and the flags have been altered since.
Correct Flush the flags from current request into the already created transaction. It make sense only in routing block if the transaction was created via t_newtran() and the flags have been altered since.
Thanks, Ruchir
Hi Ruchir,
Thanks for the report - the fixes you sent were pushed on SVN.
Regards, Bogdan
Ruchir Brahmbhatt wrote:
Few more corrections in same page:
*1.1.3. DNS Failover*
*Incorrect:* A failure *occures* if the *coresponding* interface was found for sending the request, if the TCP connection was refused *ot* if a *geenric* internal error *happend* during send. There is no ICMP error report support. *Correct:* A failure *occurs* if the *corresponding* interface was found for sending the request, if the TCP connection was refused *or* if a *generic* internal error *happened* during send. There is no ICMP error report support.
Thanks, Ruchir
-----Original Message----- *From*: Ruchir Brahmbhatt <ruchir.brahmbhatt@ecosmob.com mailto:Ruchir%20Brahmbhatt%20%3cruchir.brahmbhatt@ecosmob.com%3e> *Reply-To*: ruchir.brahmbhatt@ecosmob.com mailto:ruchir.brahmbhatt@ecosmob.com *To*: Openser users mailing list <users@lists.openser.org mailto:Openser%20users%20mailing%20list%20%3cusers@lists.openser.org%3e> *Subject*: Correction in documentation of tm module(version 1.2.X) *Date*: Wed, 28 May 2008 00:41:56 +0530
Hi,
The following sentence in section *1.4.8. **t_flush_flags() *of tm module documentation(version 1.2.X) has several spelling mistakes.
*Incorrect* Flush the flags from current request into the already created transaction. It make *sens* only in routing block if the *trnasaction* was created via t_newtran() and the flags have been altered since.
*Correct* Flush the flags from current request into the already created transaction. It make *sense* only in routing block if the *transaction* was created via t_newtran() and the flags have been altered since.
Thanks, Ruchir
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Ruchir Brahmbhatt wrote:
The following sentence in section 1.4.8. t_flush_flags() of tm module documentation(version 1.2.X) has several spelling mistakes. [..]
Hi Ruhir,
if you have further corrections to the docs to share, you could consider to join us on the openser docs mailing list at http://www.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openser-docs
The chance that your contributions get lost is smaller there, as the traffic level is not that much high, comparing to the user list..
Thanks again,
Henning