Hello,
I did a quick test and all looks fine, ports are set in via and
record-route, in my config I have:
record_route();
$fs="udp:127.0.0.1:5080";
$du = "sip:127.0.0.1:9";
t_relay();
exit;
Then sending an OPTIONS resulted in the trace shown below.
Cheers,
Daniel
U 2017/12/11 17:14:47.108430 127.0.0.1:56729 -> 127.0.0.1:5060
OPTIONS sip:test@127.0.0.1 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.178.84:62516;branch=z9hG4bK.3aaddf68;rport;alias.
From: sip:sipsak@192.168.178.84:62516;tag=16d1c24.
To: sip:test@127.0.0.1.
Call-ID: 23927844(a)192.168.178.84.
CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
Contact: sip:sipsak@192.168.178.84:62516.
Content-Length: 0.
Max-Forwards: 70.
User-Agent: sipsak 0.9.7pre.
Accept: text/plain.
.
U 2017/12/11 17:14:51.010251 127.0.0.1:5080 -> 127.0.0.1:9
OPTIONS sip:test@127.0.0.1 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:127.0.0.1:5080;r2=on;lr>.
Record-Route: <sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
127.0.0.1:5080;branch=z9hG4bK61bd.b2882fea15c488761489f8ef588efbe1.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.178.84:62516;received=127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bK.3aaddf68;rport=56729;alias.
From: sip:sipsak@192.168.178.84:62516;tag=16d1c24.
To: sip:test@127.0.0.1.
Call-ID: 23927844(a)192.168.178.84.
CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
Contact: sip:sipsak@192.168.178.84:62516.
Content-Length: 0.
Max-Forwards: 69.
User-Agent: sipsak 0.9.7pre.
Accept: text/plain.
.
On 11.12.17 16:37, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
Hello all,
I have the following issue in my configuration, tested with 5.2.0-rc1
so far:
At some point, I set the $fs pseudovariable to force a request to be
relayed through a specific socket. Although this is honoured by
kamailio (i.e. the request does indeed leave the kamailio host from
the respective socket), the port number is not added to the Via and RR
headers. As a result, all replies to the request, as well as all
subsequent requests from the other SIP UA are relayed to the default
port, 5060. Here's an example:
SIP UAC to kamailio:
INVITE 192.168.1.1:5060 <http://192.168.1.1:5060> --->
192.168.1.254:5060 <http://192.168.1.254:5060>
Kamailio to UAS ($fs is set):
INVITE 2.2.2.2:5066 <http://2.2.2.2:5066> ---> 3.3.3.3:5060
<http://3.3.3.3:5060>
Topmost Via in request relayed by kamailio is:
SIP/2.0/UDP 2.2.2.2;branch=aaaaaaaaaaaaaa <- port 5066 is not added
Topmost RR in request relayed by kamailio is:
<sip:2.2.2.2;r2=on;lr;did=bbbbbbb;nat=yes> <- port 5066 is not added
RESULT: Reply from UAS is sent to 2.2.2.2:5060 <http://2.2.2.2:5060>
Is this behaviour valid? Am I missing anything? Kamailio is configured
to listen on both sockets on IP 2.2.2.2, namely: a) udp:2.2.2.2:5060
<http://2.2.2.2:5060> and b) 2.2.2.2:5066 <http://2.2.2.2:5066>. Thanks.
BR,
George
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training -
www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 -
www.kamailioworld.com