On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:23 +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Trying to use t_relay_to_[udp|tcp] fails on my setup. That's not a problem until it works :) My problem now is that when SER handles calls from PSTN (PSTN -> AS5350 -> SER -> SIP-UA ) the call fails. The SIP-UA rings and I can pick the call up, but the PSTN phone still rings and doesn't establish the call. Sniffing traffic through ethereal discloses that the 183 SDP I see in successful calls is not present. Any ideas? thanks Here's my ser.cfg # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ listen=$SER_PUBLIC_IP listen=127.0.0.1 alias=cdlan.net alias=$SER_PUBLIC_IP # Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes check_via=no dns=no rev_dns=no #port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/uri.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/group.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database for persistent storage modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # Autenticazione al db modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "sql://ser:s3r@localhost/ser") # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # secret modparam("auth", "secret", "mysecret") # Autenticazione al db modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "sql://user:pass@localhost/ser") # Autenticazione al db modparam("group", "db_url", "sql://user:pass@localhost/ser") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # Autenticazione al db modparam("uri", "db_url", "sql://user:pass@localhost/ser") # Autenticazione al db #modparam("vm", "db_url", "sql://user:pass@localhost/ser") # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first,NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("cdlan.net", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("cdlan.net", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE" && uri=~"^sip:[^6][0-9]*@cdlan.net") { append_hf("P-hint: PSTN\r\n"); rewritehostport("10.0.1.20:5060"); route(1); break; }; lookup("aliases"); # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } # -- relay calls -- route[1] { if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !uri=~"[@:]10\.0\.1\.20" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; }