I got the aliases to finally work.
The trick for me was that you MUST put a line :
location("aliases");
Somewhere in your configuration file *before*
you can add aliases with serctl. That's because serctl
uses the fifo control file which is connected to the
running ser process. If the running ser process doesn't
have a request for aliases, it doesn't make the ability
to set one.
I recognize the first error you were getting. The
error text doesn't really make sense, it isn't the table
that is missing, rather the concept of a 'domain' space
that hasn't been referenced.
As far as your error, I didn't see it in the code, I
grep for 'expected' and find:
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: "400 ul_add: aor name
expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: ul_add: aor
expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: "400 ul_add: contact
expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: ul_add: contact
expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: "400 ul_add: expires
expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: ul_add: expires
expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: "400 ul_add: q expected\n");
usrloc/ul_fifo.c: LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: ul_add: q
expected\n");
Each of these error messages is produced when the
data was not presented on the pipe. Kinda sounds like a mismatch
in serctl and the ser program?
I'm looking in the 0.8.10 code base.
---greg
Greg Fausak
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-admin(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-admin@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of George KAPELIOS
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 5:49 AM
To: jan(a)iptel.org
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Alias assignment problem - again
Hi Jan,
Last week I followed your instructions for the alias
assignment problem I had. As a result the "400 Table
'aliases' Not Found" message is gone, but an other one
is reported: "400 ul_add is expected", as soon as I' m
running the serctl alias add ... command.
Any idea why ?
regards,
George
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers