Hi,
i use an exec_dst in a failure_route in ser 0.8.12
I have very strange behaviour.
Are there known bug using exec_dst in a failure_route ?
Could you give me exemple of good syntax to use the result of an exec_dst in a
failure_route.
The goal is in fact to forward on call in another location if a user is busy or don't
answer.
thanks.
Show replies by date