Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OpenXcap for pres-rules: no NOTIFY

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

[OpenSER-Users] ERROR:...

[OpenSER-Users] CANCEL with Route...

Mircea Amarascu

7 Mar 2008 7 Mar '08

8:24 a.m.

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 15.3 KB)

Show replies by date

Gregorio

7 Mar 7 Mar

10:17 a.m.

New subject: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OpenXcap for pres-rules: no NOTIFY

Hi Mircea et all,

It was the configuration problem that Mircea mentioned. I was using Database as the backend and it didn´t work, now with OpenSER as the backend it seems to work fine.

I wonder why my previous configuration was not working, as the configuration parameters were the same (subscribers table, xcap table, xmlrpc URI), I would also suggest to clarify this point somewhere in openSER documentation as it was not obvious for me and it is an issue difficult to find out.

Thanks for your help, and kind regards.

Gregorio.

De: Mircea Amarascu [mailto:mircea@ag-projects.com] Enviado el: viernes, 07 de marzo de 2008 9:25 Para: Gregorio CC: users@lists.openser.org Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OpenXcap for pres-rules: no NOTIFY

Hi Gregorio,

This means there's a problem when OpenXCAP should send this command to OpenSER. First, check if the XMLRPC server in OpenSER is working, if you can connect to it. Then, make sure that in OpenXCAP's configuration file you have backend = OpenSER under [Server] section, and that xmlrpc_url under [OpenSER] section is set to the address where the XMLRPC server is listening.

Gregorio wrote:

Hi Anca et all,

I have repeated the same test described in the first name with the debug level set to 7 and I couldn't find the string 'mi_refreshWatchers' in the debbug messages. I can't attach the debug messages file because it is too large. I am using OpenSer 1.3 and openXcap 0.99. My configuration related to presence is this:

modparam("presence|usrloc", "db_url", mailto:mysql://openser:password@127.0.0.1/openser "mysql://openser:password@127.0.0.1/openser") modparam("presence", "presentity_table", "presentity") modparam("presence", "active_watchers_table", "active_watchers") modparam("presence", "watchers_table", "watchers") modparam("presence", "clean_period", 100) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:192.168.1.210:5060") modparam("presence", "fallback2db", 1)

#MI_XMLRPC modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "log_file", "/var/log/openser-xmlrpc.log") modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "port", 8080)

modparam("pua", "db_url", mailto:mysql://openser:password@127.0.0.1/openser "mysql://openser:password@127.0.0.1/openser")

# -- xcap params -- modparam("presence_xml", "db_url", mailto:mysql://openser:password@127.0.0.1/openser "mysql://openser:password@127.0.0.1/openser") modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 0) #0 Activates permissions for subscriptions modparam("presence_xml", "xcap_table", "xcap") modparam("presence_xml", "integrated_xcap_server", 1)

If someone needs the debug messages I can send it to personal mail accounts, and thank you very much for helping. Regards, Gregorio.

-----Mensaje original----- De: users-bounces@lists.openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] En nombre de Anca Vamanu Enviado el: jueves, 06 de marzo de 2008 10:34 Para: greg.co CC: users@lists.openser.org Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OpenXcap for pres-rules: no NOTIFY

Hi,

I think you might be right about the problem source. The real time update in OpenSER is triggered by OpenXCAP with an mi command: "mi_refreshWatchers". You could set the 'debug' in config file to 7 and search in the log for 'mi_refreshWatchers' string and send the debug messages printed while processing.

regards, Anca Vamanu

greg.co wrote:

Hi all,

I am stuck with a presence authorization problem using openSer 1.3 and openXcap 0.9.9. I have read some similar posts in the mailing list but I couldn't find a solution, so I'll try to explain my scenario to see if it

my mistake or it is a bug.

I explain the scenario: User test1 and test2 successfully register and sunscribe to

presence.winfo.

Both receive a NOTIFY informing that their winfo subscriptions are active.

Test2 adds test1 as a contact so he subscribes to test1's presence, then test1 receives a winfo NOTIFY requesting authorization for test2. Test1

does

it sending a XCAP document to openXcap the document is correctly stored in openSer xcap table.

User test2 receives a presence NOTIFY in pending state, even if user test1 publishes other presence state, the subscription state of test2 remains pending forever.

If we look the data base in that moment:

+------+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+----- ----+----------------+----------------+----------+----------------------+--- ------------+--------------------------------------+------------+----------- --+-------------------+--------------+------------+--------+--------+------- --+------------------------+------------------------+

test2

| Mydomain | presence.winfo | NULL | 10.2670.1209516359.7 | cvvUDerBXK1Qc | b4c2997e-64ac-122b-2780-39a48cb53b8d | 1 | 96206117 | sip:192.168.1.222 | NULL | 1209519959 | 1 |

1 | udp:192.168.1.210:5060 | sip:192.168.1.210:5060 |

WATCHERS

+----+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+------- ---+--------+--------+---------------+

event

| status | reason | inserted_time |

+----+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+------- ---+--------+--------+---------------+

+----+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+------- ---+--------+--------+---------------+

XCAP

+-----+----------+----------------+----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------+--------- -+----------------------------------+--------+-------------+------+

| id | username | domain | doc

port

| 190 | test2 | Mydomain | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <resource-lists xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists"><list name="Users"><entry

uri="sip:test1@Mydomain"><display-name>test1</display-name></entry></list></ resource-lists>

| 4 | 8ea82eeb40e00fcf626dbe17d1961ad5 | 0 | buddies.xml |

encoding='UTF-8'?><ruleset

xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy' xmlns:pr='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules'><rule

id='whitelist'><conditions><identity></identity></conditions><actions>pr:su b-handlingallow</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule

id='politeblocklist'><conditions><identity></identity></conditions><actions> pr:sub-handlingpolite-block</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule

id='blacklist'><conditions><identity></identity></conditions><actions>pr:su b-handlingblock</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule></ruleset>

| 2 | 46353b3b55d23d24fd4d9c87a5ff7ba4 | 0 | index.xml |

| 4 | f854971d48ed1a8913e20b3409a6b723 | 0 | buddies.xml |

| | 193 | test1 | Mydomain | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <ruleset xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy" xmlns:pr="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"><rule id="whitelist"><conditions><identity><one

id="sip:test2@Mydomain"/></identity></conditions><actions>pr:sub-handlinga llow</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule

id="politeblocklist"><conditions/><actions>pr:sub-handlingpolite-block</pr :sub-handling></actions></rule><rule

id="blacklist"><conditions/><actions>pr:sub-handlingblock</pr:sub-handling

</actions></rule></ruleset> | 2 | 8afbf7f0464de1273303bbea554404ff

0 | index.xml | 0 |

We can see in 'WATCHERS' table that test2 has a pending presence subscription but as can be seen in 'XCAP' table user test1 has authorized test2 to see his presence.

My thinking is that once test1 changes his authorization rule, the

presence

subscription should chage to active, am I right?

My conclusion is that something between the presence rules authorization

and

the subscriptions is not working fine, or I did something wrong and I haven't noticed it. Please, I really need help with that as I have been stuck here for weeks.

Thanks in advance!! Gregorio

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

6196

Age (days ago)

6196

Last active (days ago)

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

1 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Gregorio
Mircea Amarascu