18 Feb
2008
18 Feb
'08
11:55 a.m.
Hi All
I would like to know if anyone can state the most important differences
between openSER and SER in terms of features. I am not very interested
in CPU and RAM consumption I would like to know if there are any
differences between the two servers in terms of functionality.
Thanks
18 Feb
18 Feb
12:25 p.m.
On Monday 18 February 2008, Ali Jawad wrote:
I would like to know if anyone can state the most
important differences
between openSER and SER in terms of features. I am not very interested
in CPU and RAM consumption I would like to know if there are any
differences between the two servers in terms of functionality.
Hi Ali,
well, i'm a OpenSER developers so don't espect a well balanced reply from
me.. ;-)
But i think its generally accepted that OpenSER has a bigger feature set then
SER. You can check the module list [1] for OpenSER and SER [2] yourself, in
the wiki there is also a feature matrix [3] for OpenSER.
As both projects creates/ maintains a quite complex server system, its hard to
tell which project has "better" features. This depends mainly from your
requirements.
OpenSER is a good base for providing SIP services for me, and i think this is
also true for many other users here on the list. Feel free to ask if you
have more questions in regards to a specific feature.
Cheers,
Henning
[1] http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/
[2] http://www.iptel.org/views/tableofmodules
[3] http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/capabilities:index
12:28 p.m.
Thanks for your reply.
Well what about failover, from what I have seen Openser does support SRV
so multiple servers can be setup in a round robin fashion, so if two
servers were used and one went down, 50% of the requests would still go
through. I was also told "I could not verify this" that SER does have
some failover features that allows it to detect if one server has gone
down and redirect all incoming requests to the running server.
Can anyone deny/verify this ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:25 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Cc: Ali Jawad
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER VS. SER
On Monday 18 February 2008, Ali Jawad wrote:
I would like to know if anyone can state the most
important
differences
between openSER and SER in terms of features. I am not
very interested
in CPU and RAM consumption I would like to know if there are any
differences between the two servers in terms of functionality.
Hi Ali,
well, i'm a OpenSER developers so don't espect a well balanced reply
from
me.. ;-)
But i think its generally accepted that OpenSER has a bigger feature set
then
SER. You can check the module list [1] for OpenSER and SER [2] yourself,
in
the wiki there is also a feature matrix [3] for OpenSER.
As both projects creates/ maintains a quite complex server system, its
hard to
tell which project has "better" features. This depends mainly from your
requirements.
OpenSER is a good base for providing SIP services for me, and i think
this is
also true for many other users here on the list. Feel free to ask if
you
have more questions in regards to a specific feature.
Cheers,
Henning
[1] http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/
[2] http://www.iptel.org/views/tableofmodules
[3] http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/capabilities:index
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
12:50 p.m.
Ali,
Hope this thread does not bring back old flames....
SER CVS head version has also support for NAPTR and SRV records and can
disable servers that are down for an amount of predefined time before retry
it. There are, though, small differences in the method of blocking non
answering destinations but both of them provides the generic
requirement of not sending traffic to inactive
servers for an amount of predefined time.
hope it helps,
Samuel.
2008/2/18, Ali Jawad <ali.jawad(a)splendor.net>et>:
Thanks for your reply.
Well what about failover, from what I have seen Openser does support SRV
so multiple servers can be setup in a round robin fashion, so if two
servers were used and one went down, 50% of the requests would still go
through. I was also told "I could not verify this" that SER does have
some failover features that allows it to detect if one server has gone
down and redirect all incoming requests to the running server.
Can anyone deny/verify this ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:25 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Cc: Ali Jawad
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER VS. SER
On Monday 18 February 2008, Ali Jawad wrote:
I would like to know if anyone can state the most
important
differences
between openSER and SER in terms of features. I
am not very interested
in CPU and RAM consumption I would like to know if there are any
differences between the two servers in terms of functionality.
Hi Ali,
well, i'm a OpenSER developers so don't espect a well balanced reply
from
me.. ;-)
But i think its generally accepted that OpenSER has a bigger feature set
then
SER. You can check the module list [1] for OpenSER and SER [2] yourself,
in
the wiki there is also a feature matrix [3] for OpenSER.
As both projects creates/ maintains a quite complex server system, its
hard to
tell which project has "better" features. This depends mainly from your
requirements.
OpenSER is a good base for providing SIP services for me, and i think
this is
also true for many other users here on the list. Feel free to ask if
you
have more questions in regards to a specific feature.
Cheers,
Henning
[1] http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/
[2] http://www.iptel.org/views/tableofmodules
[3] http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/capabilities:index
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
1:19 p.m.
comparing stable version openser has much more features.
I think ser version 2.0 (not yet stable although I guess others would
call it already stable - ser has other release policies then openser)
has similar features (but different kind of implementation - the syntax
in the config script differs).
One big difference is documentation - where openser is outperforming ser.
klaus
Ali Jawad schrieb:
Hi All
I would like to know if anyone can state the most important differences
between openSER and SER in terms of features. I am not very interested
in CPU and RAM consumption I would like to know if there are any
differences between the two servers in terms of functionality.
Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6126
days inactive
6126
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Ali Jawad -
Henning Westerholt -
Klaus Darilion -
samuel