I'm trying to use Asterisk's B2BUA with Openser. However I read somewhere that Asterisk can't handle as much concurrent calls as Openser can with SIP. So that's why I am trying to use both of them together.
This is gonna be somewhat I'm trying to do:
UA ----->Openser ---> Asterisk ------> PSTN Gateway or SIP
All UA should be regisetered on Openser using mysql database.
Question is, if I use this implementation, wouldn't all the call load be on Asterisk instead of Openser?
Maybe I'm getting the wrong picture, as I'm fairly new to this. So I appreciate as much help as possible. I'm trying to do this for my senior design. Thank you.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 09:12, Kenny Chua wrote:
OpenSER can handle a much higher call capacity than Asterisk can, but putting it in front doesn't really give a single Asterisk box a higher call capacity. I believe the real advantage is that you can use one OpenSER server as a front end to multiple Asterisk boxes, which directly translates into higher capacity.
---Mike
I'm trying to use Asterisk's B2BUA with Openser. However I read somewhere that Asterisk can't handle as much concurrent calls as Openser can with SIP. So that's why I am trying to use both of them together.
This is gonna be somewhat I'm trying to do:
UA ----->Openser ---> Asterisk ------> PSTN Gateway or SIP
All UA should be regisetered on Openser using mysql database.
Question is, if I use this implementation, wouldn't all the call load be on Asterisk instead of Openser?
Maybe I'm getting the wrong picture, as I'm fairly new to this. So I appreciate as much help as possible. I'm trying to do this for my senior design. Thank you.
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Kenny Chua -
Mike Williams