23 Mar
2009
23 Mar
'09
12:54 p.m.
2009/3/23 Alexandr Dubovikov <shurik(a)start4.info>fo>:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Iñaki Baz
Castillo wrote:
don't forget to disable ping for this gateway, because finaly you will have
a DDOS effect of the "offline" gw. :-)
Well, If the host is already offline then it doesn't matter to kill it more XD
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
2009/4/1 Alexandr Dubovikov
<shurik(a)start4.info>fo>:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Andreas Heise wrote:
>> Hello Iñaki,
Hi Inaki,
Hi all,
Thanks for pointing it out.
However, if a gw takes so long time (~32 seconds) to respond I prefer
to consider it as "offline" :)
you should ask Alexandr he has introdused this feature with rev5452,
but I'm not sure if he is on the lists all the time, so I'll forward your
question
to him...
sorry, I am currently offline and couldn't answer directly to the list.
anyway. I agreed, 180 seconds it's too big ping interval, but it couldn't be
also less 32 seconds.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt
17.2.2 Non-INVITE Server Transaction
T1 = 500 ms.
Timer J 64*T1 for UDP Section 17.2.2 Wait time for
0s for TCP/SCTP non-INVITE request
so, the timer for "completed" is 32 seconds and couldn't be less.
of course, you can use less value, but on own risk :-)
RFC 3261 are not recommendet it :) 
3 Jul
3 Jul
1:27 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
Hello.
I was reading this thread and it seems to me very interesting. In fact, I was looking for
a parameter that would let me mark a gateway as down and then avoid the LCR module keep
sending calls to it.
So just to clarify this topic.
If I'm using Kamailio 1.5.1 with LCR in front of several gateways, and one of them
goes down. The gateway is marked as down? Isn't?
What parameter controls the "ping" to the gateways?. Can I set a gateway down
manually?.
I'm using "fr_timer" to 3, is this a problem?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] En nombre
de Iñaki Baz Castillo
Enviado el: lunes, 23 de marzo de 2009 6:54
Para: Alexandr Dubovikov
CC: kamailio
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
2009/3/23 Alexandr Dubovikov <shurik(a)start4.info>fo>:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Iñaki Baz
Castillo wrote:
don't forget to disable ping for this gateway, because finaly you will have
a DDOS effect of the "offline" gw. :-)
Well, If the host is already offline then it doesn't matter to kill it more XD
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
2009/4/1 Alexandr Dubovikov
<shurik(a)start4.info>fo>:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Andreas Heise wrote:
>> Hello Iñaki,
Hi Inaki,
Hi all,
Thanks for pointing it out.
However, if a gw takes so long time (~32 seconds) to respond I prefer
to consider it as "offline" :)
you should ask Alexandr he has introdused this feature with rev5452,
but I'm not sure if he is on the lists all the time, so I'll forward your
question
to him...
sorry, I am currently offline and couldn't answer directly to the list.
anyway. I agreed, 180 seconds it's too big ping interval, but it couldn't be
also less 32 seconds.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt
17.2.2 Non-INVITE Server Transaction
T1 = 500 ms.
Timer J 64*T1 for UDP Section 17.2.2 Wait time for
0s for TCP/SCTP non-INVITE request
so, the timer for "completed" is 32 seconds and couldn't be less.
of course, you can use less value, but on own risk :-)
RFC 3261 are not recommendet it :)
2:10 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
Hello.
I was reading this thread and it seems to me very interesting. In fact, I
was looking for a parameter that would let me mark a gateway as down and
then avoid the LCR module keep sending calls to it. So just to clarify this
topic.
If I'm using Kamailio 1.5.1 with LCR in front of
several gateways, and one
of them goes down.
The gateway is marked as down?
Yes (if it was the appropiate value in the table).
Isn't? What parameter
controls the "ping" to the gateways?.
The field "ping" in "gw" table.
Can I set a gateway down manually?.
You can modify the table and then reloading the gws with a MI command.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
4:58 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
Hello Iñaki.
Thanks for your answer.
So, what values can take the "ping" paramenter in the table?
I mean ... 0 is up? 1 is down?.. or something like that?
Is there a way to automatically mark a gateway as down?... maybe a constant ping to the
gateway?.
Thanks again.
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] En nombre
de Iñaki Baz Castillo
Enviado el: jueves, 02 de julio de 2009 19:10
Para: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
Hello.
I was reading this thread and it seems to me very interesting. In fact, I
was looking for a parameter that would let me mark a gateway as down and
then avoid the LCR module keep sending calls to it. So just to clarify this
topic.
If I'm using Kamailio 1.5.1 with LCR in front of
several gateways, and one
of them goes down.
The gateway is marked as down?
Yes (if it was the appropiate value in the table).
Isn't? What parameter
controls the "ping" to the gateways?.
The field "ping" in "gw" table.
Can I set a gateway down manually?.
You can modify the table and then reloading the gws with a MI command.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
7:54 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
Hello Iñaki.
Thanks for your answer.
So, what values can take the "ping" paramenter in the table?
I mean ... 0 is up? 1 is down?.. or something like that?
Is there a way to automatically mark a gateway as down?... maybe a constant
ping to the gateway?.
As far as I remember (but please check the module doc), 0 means down, 1 means
up, and 2 means "no ping" (no monitorized).
Thanks again.
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] En nombre de Iñaki Baz Castillo
Enviado el: jueves, 02 de julio de 2009 19:10
Para: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
Hello.
I was reading this thread and it seems to me very interesting. In fact,
I was looking for a parameter that would let me mark a gateway as down
and then avoid the LCR module keep sending calls to it. So just to
clarify this topic.
If I'm using Kamailio 1.5.1 with LCR in front of several gateways, and
one of them goes down.
The gateway is marked as down?
Yes (if it was the appropiate value in the table).
Isn't? What parameter
controls the "ping" to the gateways?.
The field "ping" in "gw" table.
Can I set a gateway down manually?.
You can modify the table and then reloading the gws with a MI command.
11:29 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
Thanks... i can't find anything in the docs...
What about the second questions?.
Can I mark a gateway as up/down automatically via a configuration parameter?. For example
if the GW did not answer an INVITE or a ICMP could the script mark the gateway as down?
Thanks
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] En nombre
de Iñaki Baz Castillo
Enviado el: viernes, 03 de julio de 2009 12:55
Para: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
Hello Iñaki.
Thanks for your answer.
So, what values can take the "ping" paramenter in the table?
I mean ... 0 is up? 1 is down?.. or something like that?
Is there a way to automatically mark a gateway as down?... maybe a constant
ping to the gateway?.
As far as I remember (but please check the module doc), 0 means down, 1 means
up, and 2 means "no ping" (no monitorized).
Thanks again.
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] En nombre de Iñaki Baz Castillo
Enviado el: jueves, 02 de julio de 2009 19:10
Para: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello.
I was reading this thread and it seems to me very interesting. In fact,
I was looking for a parameter that would let me mark a gateway as down
and then avoid the LCR module keep sending calls to it. So just to
clarify this topic.
If I'm using Kamailio 1.5.1 with LCR in front of several gateways, and
one of them goes down.
The gateway is marked as down?
Yes (if it was the appropiate value in the table).
Isn't? What parameter
controls the "ping" to the gateways?.
The field "ping" in "gw" table.
Can I set a gateway down manually?.
You can modify the table and then reloading the gws with a MI command.
4 Jul
4 Jul
4:30 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [LCR] About ping
El Viernes, 3 de Julio de 2009, Ricardo Martinez escribió:
Thanks... i can't find anything in the docs...
What about the second questions?.
Can I mark a gateway as up/down automatically via a configuration
parameter?. For example if the GW did not answer an INVITE or a ICMP could
the script mark the gateway as down? Thanks
LCR itself will mark the gw as down and willmark is as up again when it's
active. For this, you configure, in LCR module, which SIP response codes are
required for both cases.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
5619
days inactive
5722
days old
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Ricardo Martinez