4 Aug
2011
4 Aug
'11
3:59 p.m.
Hi, I remember that in Kamailio 1.5.X t_on_branch and t_on_failure
still remain after rouning failure_route[XX], and I "think" there was
a way to reset them.
In 3.X it seems that t_on_branch and t_on_failure must be set again in
failure_route to take effect in next t_relay() call, am I right?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
4 Aug
4 Aug
4:12 p.m.
Hello,
On 8/4/11 2:59 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, I remember that in Kamailio 1.5.X t_on_branch and
t_on_failure
still remain after rouning failure_route[XX], and I "think" there was
a way to reset them.
In 3.X it seems that t_on_branch and t_on_failure must be set again in
failure_route to take effect in next t_relay() call, am I right?
I think also in
1.5 you had to set them again, at least for failure
route iirc.
To reset, just use the parameter "0" or "" for t_on_xyz().
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
4859
days inactive
4859
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Iñaki Baz Castillo