Hello,
I think it was discussed during past IRC meetings or at some events across the world, with jsonrpc being these days more popular than xmlrpc, specially due to easier integration with web based apps, I am considering to replace the example of using xmlrpc over http(s) with jsonrpc in the default configuration file. It is not enabled by default for xmlrpc (requiring to define WITH_XMLRPC), so it will stay also as a define option for jsonrpc.
The jsonrpcs module is already loaded for kamctl, it will require the xhttp module to be added.
As for those looking for xmlrpc in the future, there is another example kamailio cfg which has the option with it: misc/examples/pkg/kamailio-oob.cfg
Any other opinions?
Cheers, Daniel
I support this and do think that XMLRPC is considered a bit baroque at this point.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 06:45:40PM +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
I think it was discussed during past IRC meetings or at some events across the world, with jsonrpc being these days more popular than xmlrpc, specially due to easier integration with web based apps, I am considering to replace the example of using xmlrpc over http(s) with jsonrpc in the default configuration file. It is not enabled by default for xmlrpc (requiring to define WITH_XMLRPC), so it will stay also as a define option for jsonrpc.
The jsonrpcs module is already loaded for kamctl, it will require the xhttp module to be added.
As for those looking for xmlrpc in the future, there is another example kamailio cfg which has the option with it: misc/examples/pkg/kamailio-oob.cfg
Any other opinions?
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
On 11/5/19 3:56 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
I support this and do think that XMLRPC is considered a bit baroque at this point.
+1
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 06:45:40PM +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
I think it was discussed during past IRC meetings or at some events across the world, with jsonrpc being these days more popular than xmlrpc, specially due to easier integration with web based apps, I am considering to replace the example of using xmlrpc over http(s) with jsonrpc in the default configuration file. It is not enabled by default for xmlrpc (requiring to define WITH_XMLRPC), so it will stay also as a define option for jsonrpc.
The jsonrpcs module is already loaded for kamctl, it will require the xhttp module to be added.
As for those looking for xmlrpc in the future, there is another example kamailio cfg which has the option with it: misc/examples/pkg/kamailio-oob.cfg
Any other opinions?
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
Fred Posner fred@qxork.com https://qxork.com Direct/SMS: +1 (336) 439-3733
Need Fred? Call Fred. 336-HEY-FRED Matrix: @fred:matrix.lod.com
Hello Daniel,
no objections from my side for this change.
Cheers,
Henning
Am 05.11.19 um 18:45 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Hello,
I think it was discussed during past IRC meetings or at some events across the world, with jsonrpc being these days more popular than xmlrpc, specially due to easier integration with web based apps, I am considering to replace the example of using xmlrpc over http(s) with jsonrpc in the default configuration file. It is not enabled by default for xmlrpc (requiring to define WITH_XMLRPC), so it will stay also as a define option for jsonrpc.
The jsonrpcs module is already loaded for kamctl, it will require the xhttp module to be added.
As for those looking for xmlrpc in the future, there is another example kamailio cfg which has the option with it: misc/examples/pkg/kamailio-oob.cfg
Any other opinions?
Cheers, Daniel