11 Mar
2005
11 Mar
'05
10:52 p.m.
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
12 Mar
12 Mar
12:43 a.m.
To the contrary, extension in * is not limited to numbers. You can use
alphabet.
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Iqbal
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:53 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] mappig names to numbers for voicemail via asterisk
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
3:34 a.m.
yeah worked that out..but then I had the problem with voicemail which
seems to be...unless I missed a trick
Iqbal
On 3/11/2005, "Richard" <richard(a)o-matrix.org> wrote:
To the contrary, extension in * is not limited to
numbers. You can use
alphabet.
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Iqbal
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:53 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] mappig names to numbers for voicemail via asterisk
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
13 Mar
13 Mar
5:37 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: mappig names to numbers for voicemail via asterisk
Dear sir,
Would you tell me the benifit of asterisk to implement voicemail, instead of SEMS?
best regards,
Daniel
Iqbal write:
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)iptel.org
http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
12:34 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: mappig names to numbers for voicemail via asterisk
There are differences in the two products. It is up to
you to decide if the differences are benefits or not. In my
case I use Asterisk instead of SEMS because it allows a
telephone interface to pickup and manage messages, can
turn on/off the phone message waiting light and can allow users
to record their greetings via the telephone.
-Steve
Daniel Liu wrote:
Dear sir,
Would you tell me the benifit of asterisk to implement voicemail,
instead of SEMS?
best regards,
Daniel
Iqbal write:
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2:29 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: mappig names to numbers for voicemail via asterisk
I agree, I think asterisk is far more advanced (no flames please) that
SEMS, and if you dont need ser at the front end, for some lightweight
small pbx setups, then u can drop them directly into asterisk, by
routing ur inbounds to the asterisk box instead of ser.
Voicemail is really cool on it, as Steve explained below, but I am trying
to setup my MWI for my ser users using asterisk, and what Java posted
sometime ago using sipsak and sending NOTIFY back to ser.
Iqbal
PS I havent really tried SEMS, so this is a little biased :-)
On 3/13/2005, "Steve Blair" <blairs(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
There are differences in the two products. It is up to
you to decide if the differences are benefits or not. In my
case I use Asterisk instead of SEMS because it allows a
telephone interface to pickup and manage messages, can
turn on/off the phone message waiting light and can allow users
to record their greetings via the telephone.
-Steve
Daniel Liu wrote:
Dear sir,
Would you tell me the benifit of asterisk to implement voicemail,
instead of SEMS?
best regards,
Daniel
Iqbal write:
Hi
I am sending unanswered calls via ser to asterisk for voicemail, however
asterisk works on extensions, which are numbers, and when I redirect the
sip request it usually has iqbal(a)sip.domain in it.
is there a good way of altering this possibly using/calling the aliases
table again before rewriting or something.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7204
days inactive
7206
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel Liu -
Iqbal -
Richard -
Steve Blair