Thanks, Daniel. Based on this, is it reasonable to allocate the same number of both kinds
of workers?
On Sep 14, 2022, at 8:32 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I think there are two types of processes: "evapi dispatcher" (1 process
always) and "evapi worker" (can be many controlled by workers mod param)
and the resume of the transaction should happen in the later. The former
gets the data from sip workers and writes to evapi tcp connections, then
reads data from them (i/o event loop) and pushes to evapi workers. (iirc
:-) )
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14.09.22 13:58, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hi,
When a transaction suspended by evapi_async_relay() is resumed, in which child processes
is it resumed? Is it in the dedicated “EVAPI RELAY” workers defined by the ‘workers’
modparam to ‘evapi’?
If this is so, just trying to work out the concurrency implications and the optimal size
for the worker pool for maximal throughput. It sounds, at first glance, like it should be
roughly similar to the sizing considerations for listener children. Thoughts welcome!
Cheers,
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
*
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: