Hi All,
Mohammed, which IP Phones are you using?
There is something also I'm confused about all this Codec and bandwidth
issue.
I've seen that when I'm talking using my computer via a softphone, G.723 and
G.729 takes approximately 24kbps and 32kbps respectively of bandwidth.
But, in my terminating dedicated boxes (Quintum in my case), I see that I
need to allocate only 14-15 kbps and 17-18 kbps respectively. Sometimes,
total bandwidth is even less.
I've a 768kbps connection from my ISP under which I'm running around 50
lines. Still, the consumption doesn't go over 600kbps even during peak
hours. All my customers are using G.723r63.
Any ideas on why this is happening?
Regards
HASSAAN
On 5/27/05, Mohamed Omar <amatek2004(a)yahoo.ca> wrote:
I use dialup connection with my IPPhones which has a buildin modem without
any issue on both codec G723 and G729. I sometime get better quality on the
some phone if I use dialup then when I was braodband. this happens when I
call most aftrican country where the termination is not good. This is
because when I use broadband the media has to through some kinds of NAT
transval while the dialup normally gets public IP so no NAT transval and the
media gets the shorts path.
thanks
Mohamed
*Jorge Crichigno <jcrichigno(a)conexion.com.py>* wrote:
I think the data rates with overhead are as follow:
----------------------------------------------------------------
iLBC - 30 ms (a packet each 30 ms)
RTP payload: 50 bytes --> Rate: 13.3 Kbps
RTP: 62 bytes
UDP: 70 bytes
IP: 90 bytes --> total rate: 24 Kbps
-------------------------------------------------------------------
iLBC - 20 ms (a packet each 20 ms)
RTP payload: 38 bytes --> Rate: 15.2 Kbps
RTP: 50 bytes
UDP: 58 bytes
IP: 78 bytes --> total rate: 31.2 Kbps
-------------------------------------------------------------------
G.729 - 2 voice frame per packet
RTP payload: 20 bytes --> Rate: 8 Kbps
RTP: 32 bytes
UDP: 40 bytes
IP: 60 bytes --> Total rate: 24 Kbps
-------------------------------------------------------------------
G.729 - 4 voice frame per packet
RTP payload: 40 bytes --> Rate: 8 Kbps
RTP: 52 bytes
UDP: 60 bytes
IP: 80 bytes --> Total rate: 16 Kbps
-------------------------------------------------------------------
G.711 - 20 ms (a packet each 20 ms)
RTP payload: 160 bytes --> Rate: 64 Kbps
RTP: 172 bytes
UDP: 180 bytes
IP: 200 bytes --> Total rate: 80 Kbps
El vie, 27-05-2005 a las 10:36, Iqbal escribió:
the 5.3, 6.3K are really theoretical, i dont
think they include IP
overheads, I used media_sessions.phtml, and looked at the actual calls
per codec, and I dont think u can really get a good call without 50-70K,
also most bandwidth providers (at least here in
the UK) are
asymmetrical, so even on a 128K, u could have problems.
Having said that I have done a nice call on xlite using ilbc on dial up.
Iqbal
Kofi Obiri-Yeboah wrote:
>Just to add a fe w more details, Greger is right to point out the
quality
>inferiority of G.723 compared to those of
G711 and G729. In fact, in
most VOIP
>deployments, in order to quarantee
interoperability, a minimum
bandwidth of
>128K is specified. However to reach the wider
"lower bandwidth areas"
most
>service providers are opting for G.723 which
uses either 5.3 or 6.3K.
At this
>low bandwidth transmission needs, one could
literally reach "dial up
modem"
>equipped areas. in fact most VOIP phone
hardware and software are
begining to
>specify G.723 as their default codec. Note
that until the direct media
>connection phase of a VOIP vall setup, wide bandwidth is not required.
Also
>note that analogue phones have a maximim
bandwidth need of 3K, hence
even the
>low quality of G.723/5.3K, compared to the
average analogue phone call,
is
superior
< BR>> _______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
------------------------------
Post your free ad now! *Yahoo! Canada
Personals*<http://ca.personals.yahoo.com/>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers