1 Mar
2008
1 Mar
'08
1:29 a.m.
a few days ago there was a question on if lcr module is able to
serialize parallel forking of branches with the same q value. i
replied that there is no such capability in lcr module.
now that i have thought about the matter a bit, in my opinion the best
solution is to write a separate serialize function that rewrites the q
values rather than trying adding yet another feature to already too
complex lcr module.
-- juha
4 Mar
4 Mar
5:30 a.m.
Hi Juha,
Well,.... this links to a discussion from more than an year ago - moving
the parallel2serial converter and serial forking support from lcr to
core. Already there are 2 core functions that are doing the same (more
or less) and I will really like to see this step completed and remove
the serialization support from lcr module - as you said, the module
grows, and it should keep focused on the LCR functionality.
Regarding the q issue - I agree with your approach - instead of hacking
the serialization engine, better play with q values before serialization.
Is any common will on the first item (serialization to be moved out from
LCR)? Because, if so, we should work out a plan of action.
Regards,
Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
a few days ago there was a question on if lcr module
is able to
serialize parallel forking of branches with the same q value. i
replied that there is no such capability in lcr module.
now that i have thought about the matter a bit, in my opinion the best
solution is to write a separate serialize function that rewrites the q
values rather than trying adding yet another feature to already too
complex lcr module.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6 Mar
6 Mar
7:30 p.m.
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
Is any common will on the first item (serialization to
be moved out from
LCR)? Because, if so, we should work out a plan of action.
i don't anything against it as long as core version would implement the
same serialization capability that lcr.
i made a huge hack in lcr module in order to get per branch stuff
working, which does not exist in core version. i don't myself remember
the details, but i think i proposed adding some more stuff to
transaction state in order to remove need for the hacks.
in my opinion, it does not make sense to migrate anything to core,
before the branch stuff is fixed.
-- juha
6151
days inactive
6157
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
jh＠tutpro.com