Hi

Check this: record_route_advertised_address("T_ADDR:T_PORT");

**Regards, Ivo

On 04/12/2017 02:45 PM, Mridul B wrote:

Hi,

Using *advertised_address *core parameter in the kamailio script doesn't update the address mentioned in the Record-Route header.

We see this problem in the 200 OK message (of the INVITE msg), where the Record-Route header sent by the Kamailio contains socket address.

We're using kamailio 4.4.5 (x86_64/linux) 239f3c

Can you please tell if this core parameter is effective for changing the RR header ?

Thanks Best regards, *MRIDUL*

---

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the clarification, this really helps.

In the doc, it says that using advertised_address param should take care of the RR (other destination lumps).

<goog_30153741> https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#advertised_address

I think the doc should be updated with your example.

listen=udp:x.x.x.x:5060 advertise x.x.x.x:5060

This works perfectly when the machine instance has VIP as public IP.

@Ivo: record_route_advertised_address() also works in replacing the RR.

Thanks for the help.

Best regards, MRIDUL

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Mridul B mridul@plivo.com wrote:

Hi,

Using *advertised_address *core parameter in the kamailio script doesn't update the address mentioned in the Record-Route header.

We see this problem in the 200 OK message (of the INVITE msg), where the Record-Route header sent by the Kamailio contains socket address.

We're using kamailio 4.4.5 (x86_64/linux) 239f3c

Can you please tell if this core parameter is effective for changing the RR header ?

Thanks Best regards, *MRIDUL*