Hei, I wonder if someone could comment on this:
I have several cisco gateways distributed all over and are using the lcr module for this.
Is it possible to combine both load_contacts/next_contact and load_gw/next_gw
(I have softphones also registered with the same numbers that are behind the gateways.....)
Would it be interesting to have regexp in prefix matching aswell? ex: 4675[1-2] ?
br hw
Helge Waastad writes:
(I have softphones also registered with the same numbers that are behind the gateways.....)
why don't you define permanent contacts behind gws for those numbers?
Would it be interesting to have regexp in prefix matching aswell? ex: 4675[1-2] ?
regexps cause problems with shared memory.
-- juha
Hi, and thanks for your answer.
I'm already using permanent contacts in conjunction with the permission module.
I was only looking out for another way to use the LCR.
Aha, so you mean that this kind of matching is different from the ones used in core?
Thanks
hw
fre, 11,.08.2006 kl. 15.49 +0300, skrev Juha Heinanen:
Helge Waastad writes:
(I have softphones also registered with the same numbers that are behind the gateways.....)
why don't you define permanent contacts behind gws for those numbers?
Would it be interesting to have regexp in prefix matching aswell? ex: 4675[1-2] ?
regexps cause problems with shared memory.
-- juha
Helge Waastad writes:
Aha, so you mean that this kind of matching is different from the ones used in core?
for performance reasons rexexps should be pre-compiled to shared memory, but that cannot be done, because regexp library allocates its own dynamic memory. so one needs to do compilation on the fly which complicates implementation a lot.
-- juha
-
Helge Waastad -
Juha Heinanen