16 Aug
2006
16 Aug
'06
2:14 p.m.
Hello
Is permitted to mix the two via forms (normal form and compact form) in one SIP message?
For example i have an INVITE with this VIA's :
INVITE sip:005623341876@10.0.0.67:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.36;ftag=2179110362;lr=on>
Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.35;ftag=2179110362;lr=on>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.36;branch=z9hG4bK58f4.cdc602d2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.35;branch=z9hG4bK58f4.83fe5745.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP 64.76.148.234:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2881566366
....
If the answer is yes where can i found some documents to support this information?
Thanks again!
Best Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
16 Aug
16 Aug
7:14 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] SIP general question about via header
RFC 3261 of c'os
Section 7.3.3. If I should be more precise.
Michal
RTFM and RTFRFC :^D
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:14:24PM -0400, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello
Is permitted to mix the two via forms (normal form and compact form) in one SIP
message?
For example i have an INVITE with this VIA's :
INVITE sip:005623341876@10.0.0.67:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.36;ftag=2179110362;lr=on>
Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.35;ftag=2179110362;lr=on>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.36;branch=z9hG4bK58f4.cdc602d2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.35;branch=z9hG4bK58f4.83fe5745.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP 64.76.148.234:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2881566366
....
If the answer is yes where can i found some documents to support this information?
Thanks again!
Best Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
17 Aug
17 Aug
5:33 a.m.
Hello,
On 08/16/06 20:14, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello
Is permitted to mix the two via forms (normal form and compact
form) in one SIP message?
yes, it is permitted. You can mix the name form as well as the content
of headers (single via content per header, or multiple). I guess RFC3261
is best document to look at.
Cheers,
Daniel
For example i have an INVITE with this VIA's :
INVITE sip:005623341876@10.0.0.67:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.36;ftag=2179110362;lr=on>
Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.35;ftag=2179110362;lr=on>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.36;branch=z9hG4bK58f4.cdc602d2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.35;branch=z9hG4bK58f4.83fe5745.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP 64.76.148.234:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2881566366
....
If the answer is yes where can i found some documents to support this
information?
Thanks again!
Best Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6607
days inactive
6607
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Michal Matyska -
Ricardo Martinez