13 Oct
2014
13 Oct
'14
7:07 p.m.
just to complete the thread, the dependency problem has been fixed and
upgrade from 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.5.0.0 to 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.6.0.0 succeeded
without issues.
-- juha
14 Oct
14 Oct
11:08 a.m.
On 13/10/14 18:07, Juha Heinanen wrote:
just to complete the thread, the dependency problem
has been fixed and
upgrade from 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.5.0.0 to 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.6.0.0 succeeded
without issues.
Is it still possible to install the daemon without the kernel module?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
6:50 p.m.
On 10/14/14 04:08, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 13/10/14 18:07, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Yes it is, as the problem was fixed without making the daemon depend on
the kernel module.
cheers
just to complete the thread, the dependency
problem has been fixed and
upgrade from 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.5.0.0 to 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.6.0.0 succeeded
without issues.
Is it still possible to install the daemon without the kernel module?
15 Oct
15 Oct
2:57 p.m.
On 14/10/14 17:50, Richard Fuchs wrote:
On 10/14/14 04:08, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Great, thanks for the info!
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
On 13/10/14 18:07, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Yes
it is, as the problem was fixed without making the daemon depend on
the kernel module. just to complete the thread, the dependency
problem has been fixed and
upgrade from 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.5.0.0 to 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.6.0.0 succeeded
without issues.
Is it still possible to install the daemon without the kernel module?
3697
days inactive
3699
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Juha Heinanen -
Richard Fuchs