Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources. - sr-users

16 Mar 2005

That's what I have. I'm not sure what the setflag(1) is for, but then
again, I cannot see the entire ser.cfg.

Regards,
Paul

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:20:41 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
&lt;rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net&gt; wrote:
...
  Hello Paul.
         I have the next lines for ending media session:

 if (loose_route()) {
                 if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")  {
                         end_media_session();
                         setflag(1);
                 };
                 t_relay();
                 break;
         };

 Is this ok?.  I got the idea from a ser.cfg file in the forum.  I'm not so
 sure if this is correct.
 Can someone help me here?

 Thanks again!

 Regards,
 Ricardo

  -----Mensaje original-----
 De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
 Enviado el: Martes, 15 de Marzo de 2005 21:03
 Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
 Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.

 Yes that could help, but if you're experiencing pleny of "idle" RTP
 connections then you are probably not ending your media sessions with
 end_media_session().

 Regards,
 Paul

 On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:33:19 -0600, Alberto Cruz
 &lt;acruz(a)tekbrain.com&gt; wrote:
   If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may
be this  could help you:

  http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html

  Regards

  Alberto Cruz

  Ricardo Martinez wrote:

  Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new  mediaproxy version.
  1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I
detected a  increasing amount of
  RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know
what's  happening. Is this
  something maybe related to the way i tear dow the
session,  i'm still confuse
  with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can
this be the  cause of the
  increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is
there a way  to debug the
  mediaproxy? or something that help me to
understand what's  going on? Any
  help would be appreciated. Thanks Ricardo.-
  -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx  [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
  Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23
Para:  Ricardo Martinez CC:
  serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers]
Mediaproxy consuming RAM
 resources. I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you  showed in your
  first email. So AFAIK, that is OK. Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005
 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez &lt;rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net&gt; wrote:
  Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem.  What about the
  tear down of the sessions? Thanks! Regards,
Ricardo.-
  -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx  [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
  Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09
Para:  Ricardo Martinez CC:
  serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers]
Mediaproxy consuming RAM
 resources. Ricardo, I think the release notes on  mediaproxy-1.2 say that
  some resource leaks have been fixed. Perhaps you
can try version 1.2
 Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
 &lt;rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net&gt; wrote:
  Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
 mediaproxy running.
  Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is  increasing. It seems like
   for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the
resources  used in RAM. You
   can look this in the next lines : PID USER PRI
NI SIZE RSS  SHARE STAT %CPU
  %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
  1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4 19:22 0
  mediaproxy.py Can someone tell me if this is a bug of  mediaproxy or maybe a
  missconfiguration in my ser.cfg? I want to ask a
question  regarding to tear
  down sessions with mediaproxy
  also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if  (method=="BYE" ||
  method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT:
BYE o CANCEL recibido -->  terminando la
   sesion de media\n"); end_media_session();
setflag(1); };  t_relay(); break;
  }; Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm
still unable to  determine which
   ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy
session. You  can see for example
   this two session, both of them were ended, but
it seems to  be active even
   before that. (i ommited the source, via and
destination  IP's in the output
   of the session.py) Status Duration Codec Type
Traffic
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 --------------
  --- hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k  inactive
0'02"
  Unknown Audio 0/0/0 Can someone tell me
what's happening?  I'm runnig : [root
  mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version
mediaproxy.py 1.0  Thanks in advance.
  Regards, Ricardo M. 
_______________________________________________ Serusers
  mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
 http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
 _______________________________________________ Serusers  mailing list
  serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
 _______________________________________________
 Serusers mailing list
 serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
 http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

 _______________________________________________
 Serusers mailing list
 serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
 http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers