15 Jan
2014
15 Jan
'14
12:35 p.m.
Hello,
Thank you for your help
The REGISTER request is getting to kamailio.
I attach my tcpdump output:
http://pastebin.com/3RV9wG5G
Regards,
Kostas
On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what do you mean by "register fails"?
Is the REGISTER request getting to kamailio? Is there a reply for it?
A ngrep output taken on kamailio server for such registration would help to figure out
where is the issue.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/01/14 18:08, meres wrote:
I have kamailio 4.1.0 running on a server on a
real ip and behind a firewall.
NAT detection is enabled on kamailio because many remote clients are behind NAT, so NAT
is working fine along with rtpproxy.
Everything else (incoming, outgoing) is working fine except the following:
Users who are connected to our openvpn server (bridged mode) which is on the same subnet
with kamailio, fail to register.
I suspect that kamailio detects NAT on these clients as all of them are behind NAT, but
they also have obtained a real ip from our openvpn server on their tap interface and as a
result, REGISTER fails.
One solution, but not the best is to exclude kamailio from our openvpn routes but I would
not prefer this because I wil not be able to manage the server remotely
My config: http://pastebin.com/JSxzgmKH
Any suggestions?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 
15 Jan
15 Jan
4:16 p.m.
New subject: register fails from openvpn clients
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:35 AM, meres <meresgr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your help
The REGISTER request is getting to kamailio.
I attach my tcpdump output:
http://pastebin.com/3RV9wG5G
Your client is never responding to the authentication challenge returned by Kamailio in
the WWW-Authenticate header. Your client should be attempting a second REGISTER with an
Authorization header containing a response to Kamailio's challenge. Do the clients
have authentication enabled?
andrew
On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
what do you mean by "register fails"?
Is the REGISTER request getting to kamailio? Is there a reply for it?
A ngrep output taken on kamailio server for such registration would help to figure out
where is the issue.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/01/14 18:08, meres wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users I have kamailio 4.1.0 running on a server on a
real ip and behind a firewall.
NAT detection is enabled on kamailio because many remote clients are behind NAT, so NAT
is working fine along with rtpproxy.
Everything else (incoming, outgoing) is working fine except the following:
Users who are connected to our openvpn server (bridged mode) which is on the same subnet
with kamailio, fail to register.
I suspect that kamailio detects NAT on these clients as all of them are behind NAT, but
they also have obtained a real ip from our openvpn server on their tap interface and as a
result, REGISTER fails.
One solution, but not the best is to exclude kamailio from our openvpn routes but I would
not prefer this because I wil not be able to manage the server remotely
My config: http://pastebin.com/JSxzgmKH
Any suggestions?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
5:41 p.m.
New subject: register fails from openvpn clients
The clients manage to authenticate successfully from remote subnets or from our local
subnet but NOT while connected to our openvpn server, so it is not an authentication
issue.
On Jan 15, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Andrew Mortensen <admorten(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:35 AM, meres <meresgr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your help
The REGISTER request is getting to kamailio.
I attach my tcpdump output:
http://pastebin.com/3RV9wG5G
Your client is never responding to the authentication challenge returned by Kamailio in
the WWW-Authenticate header. Your client should be attempting a second REGISTER with an
Authorization header containing a response to Kamailio's challenge. Do the clients
have authentication enabled?
andrew
On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hello,
what do you mean by "register fails"?
Is the REGISTER request getting to kamailio? Is there a reply for it?
A ngrep output taken on kamailio server for such registration would help to figure out
where is the issue.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/01/14 18:08, meres wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users I have kamailio 4.1.0 running on a server on a
real ip and behind a firewall.
NAT detection is enabled on kamailio because many remote clients are behind NAT, so NAT
is working fine along with rtpproxy.
Everything else (incoming, outgoing) is working fine except the following:
Users who are connected to our openvpn server (bridged mode) which is on the same subnet
with kamailio, fail to register.
I suspect that kamailio detects NAT on these clients as all of them are behind NAT, but
they also have obtained a real ip from our openvpn server on their tap interface and as a
result, REGISTER fails.
One solution, but not the best is to exclude kamailio from our openvpn routes but I would
not prefer this because I wil not be able to manage the server remotely
My config: http://pastebin.com/JSxzgmKH
Any suggestions?
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6:01 p.m.
New subject: register fails from openvpn clients
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:41 AM, meres <meresgr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The clients manage to authenticate successfully from
remote subnets or from our local subnet but NOT while connected to our openvpn server, so
it is not an authentication issue.
The clients aren't responding to the authentication challenge. How OpenVPN is
contributing to that I can't say. Are the clients actually seeing the responses from
Kamailio?
andrew
On Jan 15, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Andrew Mortensen <admorten(a)isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:35 AM, meres <meresgr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hello,
Thank you for your help
The REGISTER request is getting to kamailio.
I attach my tcpdump output:
http://pastebin.com/3RV9wG5G
Your client is never responding to the authentication challenge returned by Kamailio in
the WWW-Authenticate header. Your client should be attempting a second REGISTER with an
Authorization header containing a response to Kamailio's challenge. Do the clients
have authentication enabled?
andrew
On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hello,
what do you mean by "register fails"?
Is the REGISTER request getting to kamailio? Is there a reply for it?
A ngrep output taken on kamailio server for such registration would help to figure out
where is the issue.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/01/14 18:08, meres wrote:
> I have kamailio 4.1.0 running on a server on a real ip and behind a firewall.
> NAT detection is enabled on kamailio because many remote clients are behind NAT, so
NAT is working fine along with rtpproxy.
> Everything else (incoming, outgoing) is working fine except the following:
>
> Users who are connected to our openvpn server (bridged mode) which is on the same
subnet with kamailio, fail to register.
> I suspect that kamailio detects NAT on these clients as all of them are behind NAT,
but they also have obtained a real ip from our openvpn server on their tap interface and
as a result, REGISTER fails.
>
> One solution, but not the best is to exclude kamailio from our openvpn routes but I
would not prefer this because I wil not be able to manage the server remotely
>
> My config: http://pastebin.com/JSxzgmKH
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 
6:02 p.m.
New subject: register fails from openvpn clients
Are you sure this isn't an issue of responses taking a different route
(i.e. down the tunnel) than the requests, or vice versa?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
9:23 p.m.
New subject: register fails from openvpn clients
Tcpdump shows that responses are sent from kamailio to the clients, but clients don’t seem
to receive them while connected to openvpn.
Packets are sent from the server (165.231.27.134) to my client (165.231.27.107):
20:30:30.668831 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:30.669155 IP 165.231.27.134.5060 > 165.231.27.107.55482: SIP, length: 551
20:30:31.181348 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:31.181554 IP 165.231.27.134.5060 > 165.231.27.107.55482: SIP, length: 551
20:30:32.167106 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:32.167355 IP 165.231.27.134.5060 > 165.231.27.107.55482: SIP, length: 551
20:30:34.164427 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:34.164626 IP 165.231.27.134.5060 > 165.231.27.107.55482: SIP, length: 551
but clients receive nothing:
20:30:30.669199 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:31.168801 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:32.169467 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
20:30:34.170137 IP 165.231.27.107.55482 > 165.231.27.134.5060: SIP, length: 568
I suspect that the problems occurs because of the via header:
20:59:46.104703 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 25843, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17),
length 579)
165.231.27.134.5060 > 165.231.27.107.54497: SIP, length: 551
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
212.194.26.254:54497;rport=54497;branch=z9hG4bKPjP5IK8W3I7iRqE1hlDxhFqSubJFadI9L3;received=165.231.27.107
From: "meresmac-ser"
<sip:6278@165.231.27.134>;tag=UhBz6N0PU.HrNRpL7oJeIjjW4Bw4ORvg
To: "meresmac-ser"
<sip:6278@165.231.27.134>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.b8c8
Call-ID: 6UCLEfPOYP8iXs8zRKeohVQk2vnlR0CG
CSeq: 19234 REGISTER
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="165.231.27.134",
nonce="UtbbzlLW2qKmzbnwe7FyKhQl+Tzk6gPT", qop="auth"
Server: kamailio (4.1.0 (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.194.26.254: this is the ip address of my internet gateway
but when disabling openvpn everything is fine, this is the first packet sent from kamailio
and received by my client:
21:07:55.597158 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 56684, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17),
length 560)
165.231.27.134.5060 > 212.194.26.254.4216: SIP, length: 532
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.209:4216;branch=z9hG4bKoL3qdL2fa2GCOGeG;rport=4216;received=212.194.26.254
From: "meres-ser"
<sip:6278@165.231.27.134>;tag=433AE961A89F2A8DE811E8397EDBAB0C
To: "meres-ser"
<sip:6278@165.231.27.134>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.a2a3
Call-ID: B5C301517F108CDA7A860BE1A469F2A7F718E61B
CSeq: 14578 REGISTER
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="165.231.27.134",
nonce="Utbdt1LW3IsugLC5WPoop28GYXb7rwuy", qop="auth"
Server: kamailio (4.1.0 (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
client sends REGISTER again, and server responds:
21:07:55.797353 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 56685, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17),
length 534)
165.231.27.134.5060 > 212.194.26.254.4216: SIP, length: 506
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.209:4216;branch=z9hG4bKeyaFfDUzfUzDzmxg;rport=4216;received=212.194.26.254
From: "meres-ser"
<sip:6278@165.231.27.134>;tag=433AE961A89F2A8DE811E8397EDBAB0C
To: "meres-ser"
<sip:6278@165.231.27.134>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.0fd3
Call-ID: B5C301517F108CDA7A860BE1A469F2A7F718E61B
CSeq: 14579 REGISTER
Contact:
<sip:6278@192.168.1.209:4216>;expires=600;received="sip:212.194.26.254:4216"
Server: kamailio (4.1.0 (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
So here the Via header has the client’s NAT ip (192.168.1.209)
Maybe the first packet (over openvpn) is not properly inspected by our Cisco firewall,
and/or the via header is totally incorrect
Regards,
Kostas
On Jan 15, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote:
Are you sure this isn't an issue of responses
taking a different route (i.e. down the tunnel) than the requests, or vice versa?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3967
days inactive
3967
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alex Balashov -
Andrew Mortensen -
meres