Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a very simple scenario. I would like to establish a call using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and UA2). The two agent and SER are all on public addresses. The two agents register with SER ok. However when I try to ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know that this mean there are too many hops. My config is practically the same as the basic (i.e. standard)configuration file (except for authorization and I have added a line including an alias equal to the public address of ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is correct I think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in the archives and can see that the invite is repeatedly sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are sent to ser itself, therefore the max forwards value value must be reached and this is why the error occurs.
I note that when I comment out all the t_relay()'s in ser.cfg, the error doesnt occur however the invite from UA1 reached ser and thats it.(i.e. its not forwarded)...Any help would be greatly appreciated(I run the most stable version of ser released i.e 0.8.14)
Regards, Pat.
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi Pat,
Most sure "uri==myself" doesn't match for your RURI domain. Be sure SER consider as served domain the RURI domain. At startup you see the listing of all served domains by SER. If you want to add some more, use the alias config option: alias=some.new.domain
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a very simple scenario. I would like to establish a call using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and UA2). The two agent and SER are all on public addresses. The two agents register with SER ok. However when I try to ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know that this mean there are too many hops. My config is practically the same as the basic (i.e. standard)configuration file (except for authorization and I have added a line including an alias equal to the public address of ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is correct I think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in the archives and can see that the invite is repeatedly sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are sent to ser itself, therefore the max forwards value value must be reached and this is why the error occurs.
I note that when I comment out all the t_relay()'s in ser.cfg, the error doesnt occur however the invite from UA1 reached ser and thats it.(i.e. its not forwarded)...Any help would be greatly appreciated(I run the most stable version of ser released i.e 0.8.14)
Regards, Pat.
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Thank you for reply. It is still not working correctly Im afraid.
I have added the lines :
alias= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (being the public address of my ser server) alias =127.0.0.1
at the start of the config file and added
if (uri==myself) { bla }
in the middle of my config.
Other than that my config is just the default one. As I mentioned previously I have both user agents and ser on public addresses. There is no nat or even authentication in the current setup. It is the simplest scenario, they are all connected via a hub and all have public addresses.
A sniff of the eth0 i/f of ser revealed:
an invite going from UA1 to SER. A 100 trying message sent back to UA1. Then a 483 too many hops message sent from ser to UA1.
A sniff of the loopback i/f revealed an invite message sent from ser address to ser address repeatedly.
Any further ideas? Thank you, Pat.
--- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
Hi Pat,
Most sure "uri==myself" doesn't match for your RURI domain. Be sure SER consider as served domain the RURI domain. At startup you see the listing of all served domains by SER. If you want to add some more, use the alias config option: alias=some.new.domain
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a very simple scenario. I would like to establish a call using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and
UA2).
The two agent and SER are all on public addresses.
The
two agents register with SER ok. However when I
try to
ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know that
this
mean there are too many hops. My config is
practically
the same as the basic (i.e. standard)configuration file (except for authorization and I have added a
line
including an alias equal to the public address of ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is correct
I
think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in the archives and can see that the invite is repeatedly sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are
sent to
ser itself, therefore the max forwards value value must be reached and this is why the error occurs.
I note that when I comment out all the t_relay()'s
in
ser.cfg, the error doesnt occur however the invite from UA1 reached ser and thats it.(i.e. its not forwarded)...Any help would be greatly
appreciated(I
run the most stable version of ser released i.e 0.8.14)
Regards, Pat.
___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even
more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Voice System http://www.voice-system.ro
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi Pat,
Set as alias the domain name (as DNS name). If your requests look like user@foo.org, set alias=foo.org
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Thank you for reply. It is still not working correctly Im afraid.
I have added the lines :
alias= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (being the public address of my ser server) alias =127.0.0.1
at the start of the config file and added
if (uri==myself) { bla }
in the middle of my config.
Other than that my config is just the default one. As I mentioned previously I have both user agents and ser on public addresses. There is no nat or even authentication in the current setup. It is the simplest scenario, they are all connected via a hub and all have public addresses.
A sniff of the eth0 i/f of ser revealed:
an invite going from UA1 to SER. A 100 trying message sent back to UA1. Then a 483 too many hops message sent from ser to UA1.
A sniff of the loopback i/f revealed an invite message sent from ser address to ser address repeatedly.
Any further ideas? Thank you, Pat.
--- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
Hi Pat,
Most sure "uri==myself" doesn't match for your RURI domain. Be sure SER consider as served domain the RURI domain. At startup you see the listing of all served domains by SER. If you want to add some more, use the alias config option: alias=some.new.domain
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a very simple scenario. I would like to establish a call using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and
UA2).
The two agent and SER are all on public addresses.
The
two agents register with SER ok. However when I
try to
ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know that
this
mean there are too many hops. My config is
practically
the same as the basic (i.e. standard)configuration file (except for authorization and I have added a
line
including an alias equal to the public address of ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is correct
I
think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in the archives and can see that the invite is repeatedly sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are
sent to
ser itself, therefore the max forwards value value must be reached and this is why the error occurs.
I note that when I comment out all the t_relay()'s
in
ser.cfg, the error doesnt occur however the invite from UA1 reached ser and thats it.(i.e. its not forwarded)...Any help would be greatly
appreciated(I
run the most stable version of ser released i.e 0.8.14)
Regards, Pat.
The domain name is the ip address of the ser server i.e. a user registers as 2001@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Therefore I set alias=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in my ser.cfg.
Pat --- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
Hi Pat,
Set as alias the domain name (as DNS name). If your requests look like user@foo.org, set alias=foo.org
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Thank you for reply. It is still not working
correctly
Im afraid.
I have added the lines :
alias= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (being the public address
of my
ser server) alias =127.0.0.1
at the start of the config file and added
if (uri==myself) { bla }
in the middle of my config.
Other than that my config is just the default one.
As
I mentioned previously I have both user agents and
ser
on public addresses. There is no nat or even authentication in the current setup. It is the simplest scenario, they are all connected via a
hub
and all have public addresses.
A sniff of the eth0 i/f of ser revealed:
an invite going from UA1 to SER. A 100 trying
message
sent back to UA1. Then a 483 too many hops message sent from ser to UA1.
A sniff of the loopback i/f revealed an invite
message
sent from ser address to ser address repeatedly.
Any further ideas? Thank you, Pat.
--- Marian Dumitru
marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro
wrote:
Hi Pat,
Most sure "uri==myself" doesn't match for your
RURI
domain. Be sure SER consider as served domain the RURI domain. At startup you see the listing of all served domains by SER. If you want
to
add some more, use the alias config option: alias=some.new.domain
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a
very
simple scenario. I would like to establish a call using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and
UA2).
The two agent and SER are all on public
addresses.
The
two agents register with SER ok. However when I
try to
ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know that
this
mean there are too many hops. My config is
practically
the same as the basic (i.e.
standard)configuration
file (except for authorization and I have added a
line
including an alias equal to the public address of ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is
correct
I
think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in
the
archives and can see that the invite is
repeatedly
sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are
sent to
ser itself, therefore the max forwards value
value
must be reached and this is why the error occurs.
I note that when I comment out all the
t_relay()'s
in
ser.cfg, the error doesnt occur however the
invite
from UA1 reached ser and thats it.(i.e. its not forwarded)...Any help would be greatly
appreciated(I
run the most stable version of ser released i.e 0.8.14)
Regards, Pat.
-- Voice System http://www.voice-system.ro
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi Pat,
do some small test - add at the beginning of your script: if (uri==myself) { log(1,"uri is myself\n"); };
and see if you get that message in ser output/logs. Just to be sure that myself test is passed.
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
The domain name is the ip address of the ser server i.e. a user registers as 2001@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Therefore I set alias=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in my ser.cfg.
Pat --- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
Hi Pat,
Set as alias the domain name (as DNS name). If your requests look like user@foo.org, set alias=foo.org
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Thank you for reply. It is still not working
correctly
Im afraid.
I have added the lines :
alias= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (being the public address
of my
ser server) alias =127.0.0.1
at the start of the config file and added
if (uri==myself) { bla }
in the middle of my config.
Other than that my config is just the default one.
As
I mentioned previously I have both user agents and
ser
on public addresses. There is no nat or even authentication in the current setup. It is the simplest scenario, they are all connected via a
hub
and all have public addresses.
A sniff of the eth0 i/f of ser revealed:
an invite going from UA1 to SER. A 100 trying
message
sent back to UA1. Then a 483 too many hops message sent from ser to UA1.
A sniff of the loopback i/f revealed an invite
message
sent from ser address to ser address repeatedly.
Any further ideas? Thank you, Pat.
--- Marian Dumitru
marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro
wrote:
Hi Pat,
Most sure "uri==myself" doesn't match for your
RURI
domain. Be sure SER consider as served domain the RURI domain. At startup you see the listing of all served domains by SER. If you want
to
add some more, use the alias config option: alias=some.new.domain
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a
very
simple scenario. I would like to establish a call using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and
UA2).
The two agent and SER are all on public
addresses.
The
two agents register with SER ok. However when I
try to
ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know that
this
mean there are too many hops. My config is
practically
the same as the basic (i.e.
standard)configuration
file (except for authorization and I have added a
line
including an alias equal to the public address of ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is
correct
I
think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in
the
archives and can see that the invite is
repeatedly
sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are
sent to
ser itself, therefore the max forwards value
value
must be reached and this is why the error occurs.
I note that when I comment out all the
t_relay()'s
in
ser.cfg, the error doesnt occur however the
invite
from UA1 reached ser and thats it.(i.e. its not
forwarded)...Any help would be greatly
appreciated(I
run the most stable version of ser released i.e 0.8.14)
Regards, Pat.
-- Voice System http://www.voice-system.ro
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi Marian,
I carried out the test you suggested and the message printed out in /var/log/messages, so I still have the 483, too many hops error. Therefore the client uri definately matched the domain part of the sip url. As mentioned previously I change the domain in /etc/hosts on the ser machine(and also added the gateway),I added the dns address in /etc/resolve.conf and I also edited the address in /etc/profile. Therefore at this stage I dont think its the domain....at least i dont think so anyway...I have checked that ser is listening on the address specified with the specified port using netstat -tunap and it is running. When I sniff the loopback interface on ser I see tht the invite message is repeatedly issued to the ser machine. The sequence for this was shown in the first email.I have included my default config below (its pretty basic) and any further thoughts would be appreciated. Both clients and ser are on public ip's.
Kindest regards, Pat
# # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei
Exp $
# # simple quick-start config script #
# ----------- global configuration parameters
------------------------
#debug=3 # debug level (cmd line:
-dddddddddd)
#fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes */
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
alias=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx #ser public address alias=127.0.0.1 #loopback address if it makes
#a difference
alias=sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx #makes a diff??
# ------------------ module loading
----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific
parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous
line
#modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
# -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which
true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs
happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# ------------------------- request routing logic
-------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; };
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy;
that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream
entities
# use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; };
# if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following
command
# with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) {
log(1,"test if this prints out"); if (method=="REGISTER") {# Uncomment this if you want to use digest
authentication
# if (!www_authorize("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx",
"subscriber")) {
# www_challenge("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "0"); # break; # };
save("location"); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our
USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; };}; # forward to current uri now; use stateful
forwarding; that
# works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); };
}
--- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
Hi Pat,
do some small test - add at the beginning of your script: if (uri==myself) { log(1,"uri is myself\n"); };
and see if you get that message in ser output/logs. Just to be sure that myself test is passed.
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
The domain name is the ip address of the ser
server
i.e. a user registers as 2001@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Therefore I set alias=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in my
ser.cfg.
Pat --- Marian Dumitru
marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro
wrote:
Hi Pat,
Set as alias the domain name (as DNS name). If
your
requests look like user@foo.org, set alias=foo.org
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Thank you for reply. It is still not working
correctly
Im afraid.
I have added the lines :
alias= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (being the public address
of my
ser server) alias =127.0.0.1
at the start of the config file and added
if (uri==myself) { bla }
in the middle of my config.
Other than that my config is just the default
one.
As
I mentioned previously I have both user agents
and
ser
on public addresses. There is no nat or even authentication in the current setup. It is the simplest scenario, they are all connected via a
hub
and all have public addresses.
A sniff of the eth0 i/f of ser revealed:
an invite going from UA1 to SER. A 100 trying
message
sent back to UA1. Then a 483 too many hops
message
sent from ser to UA1.
A sniff of the loopback i/f revealed an invite
message
sent from ser address to ser address repeatedly.
Any further ideas? Thank you, Pat.
--- Marian Dumitru
marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro
wrote:
Hi Pat,
Most sure "uri==myself" doesn't match for your
RURI
domain. Be sure SER consider as served domain the RURI domain. At startup you see the listing of all served domains by SER. If you
want
to
add some more, use the alias config option: alias=some.new.domain
Best regards, Marian
pat newham wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list and SEr and am trying a
very
simple scenario. I would like to establish a
call
using SER via two grandstream BT100's(UA1 and
UA2).
The two agent and SER are all on public
addresses.
The
two agents register with SER ok. However when I
try to
ring UA2 from UA1, I get a 483 error. I know
that
this
mean there are too many hops. My config is
practically
the same as the basic (i.e.
standard)configuration
file (except for authorization and I have added
a
line
including an alias equal to the public address
of
ser....the "if (uri==myself)" statement is
correct
I
think...I checked).
I checked the loopback address as suggested in
the
archives and can see that the invite is
repeatedly
sent to ser itself and 100 trying messages are
sent to
=== message truncated ===
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
-
Marian Dumitru -
pat newham