can you suggest me some way to overcome this.
Regards,
Ranveer.
On 8/11/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hello,
On 08/10/05 21:10, ranveer kunal wrote:
hi daniel,
as far as i have explored force_rport(), places the rport
parameter in the topmost via header and not in its own via header. am
i right ?
example :
UAC -> (via1:via2:via3)proxy(force_rport)->(via1:via2:via3,rport:via4)next proxy
i want this :
UAC -> (via1:via2:via3)proxy(force_rport)->(via1:via2:via3:via4,rport)next proxy
Please clarify it ?
yes, it is like that. And this is how it is supposed to be, according to
RFC3581. Why do you need it in proxy's via? The proxy will look at the
second via to get the destination address for reply.
Daniel
>Regards,
>Ranveer.
>
>On 8/10/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>you have to use force_rport() in the configuration file for the request
>>you want rport parameter in VIA.
>>
>>Daniel
>>
>>
>>On 08/10/05 20:44, ranveer kunal wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>hi all,
>>> Is there a way to configure openser so that it sends rport in
>>>via header ? Actually th packet from server is reverse natted through
>>>another system using any random port, i want it the reply to come on
>>>the same port . thanks ....
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Ranveer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>